Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:11 pm



Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
 Best and Worst of 2004 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post Best and Worst of 2004
2004 FILMS (BASED ON ROTTEN TOMATOES)

Here are the best and worst of the year, according to RottenTomatoes.com. This includes only films that received 80% or more (best) or 20% or less (worst) on RottenTomatoes.com’s weekly Top 20 list, so small films are basically not represented here, even if they did get really good reviews. Interesting how many more bad films make the Top 20, isn’t it? (The number in parenthesis is the highest position the film reached in the charts, and is used to break ties)



BEST

1. The Incredibles (1) 96%
2. Sideways (11) 96%
3. Control Room (18) 96%
4. Hero (1) 94%
5. Before Sunset (19) 94%
6. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (7) 93%
7. Spiderman 2 (1) 92%
8. Super Size Me (10) 92%
9. Shaun of the Dead (6) 91%
10. Shrek 2 (1) 90%
11. Vera Drake (20) 89%
12. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (1) 88%
13. The Aviator (4) 88%
14. Garden State (11) 88%
15. House of Flying Daggers (15) 88%
16. Mean Girls (1) 87%
17. Kinsey (14) 87%
18. Kill Bill volume 2 & Collateral & Fahrenheit 9/11 (1) 85%
19. Finding Neverland (8) 84%
20. The Motorcycle Diaries (9) 82%
21. Ray & Miracle & Friday Night Lights [tie] (2) 81%
22. The Bourne Supremacy (1) 80%
23. The Manchurian Candidate (3) 80%

WORST

1. Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 (11) 0%
2. Twisted (3) 2%
3. Yu-Gi-Oh! The Movie (4) 2%
4. Godsend (2) 3%
5. The Cookout (9) 3%
6. Christmas with the Kranks (2) 4%
7. My Baby’s Daddy (6) 4%
8. Envy (6) 5%
9. The Whole Ten Yards (8) 5%
10. Johnson Family Vacation (3) 6%
11. Surviving Christmas (7) 7%
12. Darkness (6) 8%
13. Catwoman (3) 9%
14. Taxi (4) 9%
15. A Cinderella Story (4) 10%
16. First Daughter (5) 10%
17. Exorcist: The Beginning (1) 11%
18. Catch that Kid (6) 11%
19. White Chicks & Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen [tie] (2) 13%
20. Garfield (4) 13%
21. Against the Ropes (8) 13%
22. Therese: The Story of Saint Therese of Lisieux (20) 13%
23. New York Minute & Welcome to Mooseport [tie] (4) 14%
24. After the Sunset (3) 15%
25. Agent Cody Banks 2 & The Perfect Score [tie] (5) 15%
26. Alexander & Raise Your Voice [tie] (6) 15%
27. The Big Bounce (13) 15%
28. Without a Paddle (2) 16%
29. Suspect Zero (10) 16%
30. You Got Served (1) 17%
31. A Day Without a Mexican (12) 17%
32. Soul Plane (5) 18%
33. Little Black Book & Laws of Attraction [tie] (5) 19%
34. Chasing Liberty (7) 19%
35. Thunderbirds (11) 19%
36. Fat Albert (3) 20%
37. Paparazzi (4) 20%
38. Sleepover (10) 20%

(Edited, after reviewing Rotten Tomatoes' list, to correct a few percentages that apaprently changed over time from when these films left the top 20!)

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Last edited by Groucho on Wed Dec 29, 2004 10:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.



Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:07 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Where is Million Dollar Baby? Is that considered a small film? Considering Sideways, Before Sunset, House of Flying Daggers are on the chart, I don't see why Hotel Rwanda, Bad Education, and Maria Full of Grace aren't.

Here are the top movies by Rottentomatoes:

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/besto ... ?year=2004

The list filters out the movies with fewer than 20 reviews, so I think it's a quite accurate list.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:54 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67028
Post Re: Best and Worst of 2004
Mike Ventrella wrote:


BEST

2. The Incredibles (1) 96%
9. Shaun of the Dead (6) 91%
10. Shrek 2 (1) 90%
23. The Bourne Supremacy (1) 80%


Im liking these big time, but whee is Collateral :cry:

Mike Ventrella wrote:
WORST

13. Catwoman (3) 9%
20. Garfield (4) 13%


Why are these here :(

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:11 pm
Profile WWW
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
Catwoman was by far the worst of the year, and Confessions Of A Teenage Drama Queen wasn't too good either.


Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:13 pm
Profile YIM WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67028
Post 
Pinkpanther wrote:
Catwoman was by far the worst of the year


No way!!!! :cry:

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:16 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
i agree with oth the best and worst! :)


Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:18 pm
Profile
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
matatonio wrote:
i agree with oth the best and worst! :)


For the most part I do too, but where is Raise Your Voice?


Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:22 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
Pinkpanther wrote:
matatonio wrote:
i agree with oth the best and worst! :)


For the most part I do too, but where is Raise Your Voice?


...on the good side or bad side?!


Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:23 pm
Profile
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
matatonio wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
matatonio wrote:
i agree with oth the best and worst! :)


For the most part I do too, but where is Raise Your Voice?


...on the good side or bad side?!


I agree on both, but I really enjoyed "Raise Your Voice", but that's probably because I am a huge fan of Hilary Duff.


Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:25 pm
Profile YIM WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28291
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Pinkpanther wrote:
I agree on both, but I really enjoyed "Raise Your Voice", but that's probably because I am a huge fan of Hilary Duff.


NO! Really?! :wink:

Why does Hero have 95%? I really thought this film wasn't that great at all, and even the battle scenes couldn't save the film. Just my opinion, though. Obviously it was well-liked by critics.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:20 pm
Profile
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
I agree on both, but I really enjoyed "Raise Your Voice", but that's probably because I am a huge fan of Hilary Duff.


NO! Really?! :wink:

Why does Hero have 95%? I really thought this film wasn't that great at all, and even the battle scenes couldn't save the film. Just my opinion, though. Obviously it was well-liked by critics.


I loved Hero, but I do agree it should be a little lower than that.


Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:39 pm
Profile YIM WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28291
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Pinkpanther wrote:
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
I agree on both, but I really enjoyed "Raise Your Voice", but that's probably because I am a huge fan of Hilary Duff.


NO! Really?! :wink:

Why does Hero have 95%? I really thought this film wasn't that great at all, and even the battle scenes couldn't save the film. Just my opinion, though. Obviously it was well-liked by critics.


I loved Hero, but I do agree it should be a little lower than that.


Well, it was all right, but 95%? It wasn't THAT good, by any means.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:47 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Where is Million Dollar Baby? Is that considered a small film? Considering Sideways, Before Sunset, House of Flying Daggers are on the chart, I don't see why Hotel Rwanda, Bad Education, and Maria Full of Grace aren't.

Here are the top movies by Rottentomatoes:

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/besto ... ?year=2004

The list filters out the movies with fewer than 20 reviews, so I think it's a quite accurate list.



I only included films that made the top 20, because otherwise I ended up with a huge list like the one you posted, with too many small films represented. I wanted a more mainstream list...

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:58 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
Pinkpanther wrote:
For the most part I do too, but where is Raise Your Voice?


There are ties listed there! "Raise your Voice" is tied with "Alexander" on the worst list and "Collateral" is tied with "Kill Bill 2" on the best list...

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:59 pm
Profile WWW
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am
Posts: 16278
Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
Post 
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
I agree on both, but I really enjoyed "Raise Your Voice", but that's probably because I am a huge fan of Hilary Duff.


NO! Really?! :wink:

Why does Hero have 95%? I really thought this film wasn't that great at all, and even the battle scenes couldn't save the film. Just my opinion, though. Obviously it was well-liked by critics.


I loved Hero, but I do agree it should be a little lower than that.


Well, it was all right, but 95%? It wasn't THAT good, by any means.


A 95% rating at Rotten Tomatoes is misleading. Because they essentially only rate a movie as fresh or rotten, much like Roger Ebert's thumbs up and thumbs down system. So, in theory every critic could think a movie is just good enough to get a thumbs up (60%-ish) and Rotten Tomatoes would rate it at 100%, despite everyone just being lukewarm-ish about it.

Hero strikes me as a movie most people would give thumbs up to, but few would rate it 95% or higher.


Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:03 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
TonyMontana wrote:
A 95% rating at Rotten Tomatoes is misleading. Because they essentially only rate a movie as fresh or rotten, much like Roger Ebert's thumbs up and thumbs down system. So, in theory every critic could think a movie is just good enough to get a thumbs up (60%-ish) and Rotten Tomatoes would rate it at 100%, despite everyone just being lukewarm-ish about it.

Hero strikes me as a movie most people would give thumbs up to, but few would rate it 95% or higher.


Not really. The average score is 8.2 out of 10, one of the highest of the year as well. It's hard to have everyone feel just lukewarm about a movie when it's 95% fresh because statistically, those people will break 50/50 either way. Normally the average score is one level below the percentage. For example, The Aviator has 88% and 7.9 average rating; The Bourn Supremacy has 80% and 7.2 average rating. There is definitely a correlation.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Last edited by xiayun on Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.



Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:08 pm
Profile WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28291
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
TonyMontana wrote:
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
Mr. X wrote:
Pinkpanther wrote:
I agree on both, but I really enjoyed "Raise Your Voice", but that's probably because I am a huge fan of Hilary Duff.


NO! Really?! :wink:

Why does Hero have 95%? I really thought this film wasn't that great at all, and even the battle scenes couldn't save the film. Just my opinion, though. Obviously it was well-liked by critics.


I loved Hero, but I do agree it should be a little lower than that.


Well, it was all right, but 95%? It wasn't THAT good, by any means.


A 95% rating at Rotten Tomatoes is misleading. Because they essentially only rate a movie as fresh or rotten, much like Roger Ebert's thumbs up and thumbs down system. So, in theory every critic could think a movie is just good enough to get a thumbs up (60%-ish) and Rotten Tomatoes would rate it at 100%, despite everyone just being lukewarm-ish about it.

Hero strikes me as a movie most people would give thumbs up to, but few would rate it 95% or higher.


Yeah, I get what you mean. Even I would probably give a slight recommendation, too.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:08 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Hero has 8.2 with 18,416 votes on IMDb, as well as a score of 81 at MetaCritic. It's pretty consistent across the board, so I'd conclude many people love the film instead of just barely like it.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:10 pm
Profile WWW
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am
Posts: 16278
Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
Post 
xiayun wrote:
TonyMontana wrote:
A 95% rating at Rotten Tomatoes is misleading. Because they essentially only rate a movie as fresh or rotten, much like Roger Ebert's thumbs up and thumbs down system. So, in theory every critic could think a movie is just good enough to get a thumbs up (60%-ish) and Rotten Tomatoes would rate it at 100%, despite everyone just being lukewarm-ish about it.

Hero strikes me as a movie most people would give thumbs up to, but few would rate it 95% or higher.


Not really. The average score is 8.2 out of 10, one of the highest of the year as well. It's hard to have everyone feel just lukewarm about a movie when it's 95% fresh because statistically, those people will break 50/50 either way. Normally the average score is one level below the percentage. For example, The Aviator has 88% and 7.9 average rating; The Bourn Supremacy has 80% and 7.2 average rating. There is definitely a correlation.


My point is that the 95% rating is misleading, as it's REAL score is an 82% as you pointed out. There is a big difference to me between a movie that rates a 95% and one that rates a 82%, and I think that's what Mr. X is saying. Hero seems like a movie that rates a 80%, but not 95%.

I prefer sites like metacritic.com as that deals with the hard scores not an overly simplistic thumbs up or thumbs down type score.


Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:28 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
TonyMontana wrote:
My point is that the 95% rating is misleading, as it's REAL score is an 82% as you pointed out. There is a big difference to me between a movie that rates a 95% and one that rates a 82%, and I think that's what Mr. X is saying. Hero seems like a movie that rates a 80%, but not 95%.

I prefer sites like metacritic.com as that deals with the hard scores not an overly simplistic thumbs up or thumbs down type score.


I understand. However, in that sense, as I pointed out, none of the movies in the 90% range deserves to be in the 90%, as their average scores are all in the 8.something. It's not just misleading for Hero, it's misleading for all movies. Why single out only one? Look at The Incredibles. It has an even higher 96%, but its average is actually 8.2 too. Its IMDb score and MetaCritics are also similar to Hero. That's my point. The RT % ranking will always exaggerate for all movies.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:32 pm
Profile WWW
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am
Posts: 16278
Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
Post 
xiayun wrote:
TonyMontana wrote:
My point is that the 95% rating is misleading, as it's REAL score is an 82% as you pointed out. There is a big difference to me between a movie that rates a 95% and one that rates a 82%, and I think that's what Mr. X is saying. Hero seems like a movie that rates a 80%, but not 95%.

I prefer sites like metacritic.com as that deals with the hard scores not an overly simplistic thumbs up or thumbs down type score.


I understand. However, in that sense, as I pointed out, none of the movies in the 90% range deserves to be in the 90%, as their average scores are all in the 8.something. It's not just misleading for Hero, it's misleading for all movies. Why single out only one? Look at The Incredibles. It has an even higher 96%, but its average is actually 8.2 too. Its IMDb score and MetaCritics are also similar to Hero. That's my point. The RT % ranking will always exaggerate for all movies.


I didn't mean to single out just Hero - a movie I did like. I just was explaining why it received such an incredibly high score. There are those movies - like the Incredibles, Hero or Finding Nemo - that nearly everyone will give at least give a thumbs up to, thus it drives up the Rotten Tomatoes score to dispraportinately high levels.

RT will almost always exaggerate the score whether it be bad or good. A movie like Matrix Revolutions that scores a 53% average with critics, will score a 36% at Rotten Tomatoes. Or, look at Mean Girls which averages a decent 70% score with critics, but an insane 87% at Rotten Tomatoes. A lot of times they are 15%-20% off the average, on either sides. To the casual viewer, they'll see the 87% Mean Girls score and think it's an Oscar winning flick.

A plus/minus 20% margin of error is not a small one.


Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:01 am
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Compared to most of the pre-Oscar season films, Hero is like gold.


Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:10 am
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67028
Post Re: Best and Worst of 2004
Mike Ventrella wrote:
BEST

18. Kill Bill volume 2 & Collateral


Oooh didnt see that before :D Its much much much better than Kill Bill Vol 2 though :x

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Thu Dec 30, 2004 9:44 am
Profile WWW
Horror Hound
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:44 pm
Posts: 6228
Post 
Go Catwoman!! :D

lol


Thu Dec 30, 2004 11:40 am
Profile
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 67028
Post 
[quote="mansonmyers"]Go Catwoman!! :D

lol[/quote

Its in the "worst" list, maye, c'mon, dont cheer it :cry:

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:02 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 25 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.