World of KJ :: View topic - The Biggest Movie Mistakes from 2004

World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

The Biggest Movie Mistakes from 2004 http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2790	Page 1 of 1

Author:	xiayun [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:15 pm ]
Post subject:	The Biggest Movie Mistakes from 2004
http://www.moviemistakes.com/bestof2004.php I love this kind of reading about details. Here are the best mistakes all-time: http://www.moviemistakes.com/best.php

Author:	neo_wolf [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:33 pm ]
Post subject:
Star Wars When the stormtroopers break into the control room, watch very carefully and you will be able to see a storm trooper nearly render himself unconscious by smacking his head off a door frame. This is now so notorious that on the new DVD there's an audible "bump" when he hits it. Charlie's Angels When the Angels are fighting the "Creepy Thin Man," right before Drew Barrymore lifts up Lucy Liu to spin her around and kick the thin man, to get Lucy's attention, Drew hollers out "Lucy!" even though Lucy Liu's character's name is "Alex." Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone When Harry, Ron and Hermione rush to Hagrid after the end of the year exams, and Harry is saying something that ends with, "Why didn't I see it before?", Hermione is mouthing his lines. Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory In the beginning of the movie, when the candy store owner is singing the candy man song, there's a spot towards the end of the song where he lifts up his counter to let all the kids in. Watch the little blonde girl as she gets wolloped in the chin by the counter.

Author:	A. G. [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:47 pm ]
Post subject:
Spider-Man 2 had another glaring mistake, a plot hole, even though I liked the movie a lot. When Doc Ock goes to Osbourne to get the compound he needs for the fusion, why doesn't he just take it? He could either kill Osbourne and ransack the apartment or choke Osbourne till he tells him where it is and have Os open the safe. Osbourne had no leverage to negotiate and ask for the head of spider-man.

Author:	Maximus [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:
I love the site. 8)

Author:	BacktotheFuture [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:
Archie Gates wrote: Spider-Man 2 had another glaring mistake, a plot hole, even though I liked the movie a lot. When Doc Ock goes to Osbourne to get the compound he needs for the fusion, why doesn't he just take it? He could either kill Osbourne and ransack the apartment or choke Osbourne till he tells him where it is and have Os open the safe. Osbourne had no leverage to negotiate and ask for the head of spider-man. That's neither a mistake or a plot hole. That's just how they wrote the film.

Author:	Algren [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:25 pm ]
Post subject:
Good site man

Author:	Kris K [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 11:38 am ]
Post subject:
LOVE the charlies angels one!! Glad to see Catwoman didn't appear in the 2004 one!

Author:	Algren [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:07 pm ]
Post subject:
mansonmyers wrote: LOVE the charlies angels one!! Glad to see Catwoman didn't appear in the 2004 one! Why would it? i didnt spot any mistakes :? Also, not enough people went to watch it for people to spot mistakes. They were obviously too busy laughing or leaving the theatre.

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:
EVERY movie has mistakes

Author:	Algren [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:26 pm ]
Post subject:
zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true.

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:31 pm ]
Post subject:
Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance.

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:33 pm ]
Post subject:
http://www.moviemistakes.com/film4423

Author:	Algren [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:36 pm ]
Post subject:
zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance?

Author:	Algren [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:37 pm ]
Post subject:
zach wrote: http://www.moviemistakes.com/film4423 you devil

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:40 pm ]
Post subject:
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting

Author:	Algren [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:
zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting How can "bad acting" be considered a mistake?

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:
Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting How can "bad acting" be considered a mistake? I'm saying every movie has flaws. Bad acting can lead to a bad movie. Movies are carried on the actor's part. If the actor is bad, then the movie is ultimately flawed. Every movie has a weak link. That's all I'm saying. I guess I don't think the perfect movie has ever been made - and never will be.

Author:	A. G. [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:
BacktotheFuture wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Spider-Man 2 had another glaring mistake, a plot hole, even though I liked the movie a lot. When Doc Ock goes to Osbourne to get the compound he needs for the fusion, why doesn't he just take it? He could either kill Osbourne and ransack the apartment or choke Osbourne till he tells him where it is and have Os open the safe. Osbourne had no leverage to negotiate and ask for the head of spider-man. That's neither a mistake or a plot hole. That's just how they wrote the film. They wrote the film with a glaring plot hole.

Author:	BacktotheFuture [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:
Archie Gates wrote: BacktotheFuture wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Spider-Man 2 had another glaring mistake, a plot hole, even though I liked the movie a lot. When Doc Ock goes to Osbourne to get the compound he needs for the fusion, why doesn't he just take it? He could either kill Osbourne and ransack the apartment or choke Osbourne till he tells him where it is and have Os open the safe. Osbourne had no leverage to negotiate and ask for the head of spider-man. That's neither a mistake or a plot hole. That's just how they wrote the film. They wrote the film with a glaring plot hole. IT'S NOT A PLOT HOLE!!!

Author:	BacktotheFuture [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:36 pm ]
Post subject:
zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting How can "bad acting" be considered a mistake? I'm saying every movie has flaws. Bad acting can lead to a bad movie. Movies are carried on the actor's part. If the actor is bad, then the movie is ultimately flawed. Every movie has a weak link. That's all I'm saying. I guess I don't think the perfect movie has ever been made - and never will be. You're confusing the site then. It's not about how the movie is, it's about "oh look at that a camera guy in the background." You're confusing it big time.

Author:	xiayun [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:
Yeah, it's a site about obvious camera mistakes, like the plate number changed between shots, or continuity issues. It's not about flaws that people don't like about the movie. It's really a fun site when I check the film I love such as Before Sunset. I thought "what can the fans find in a movie with basically two people talking and walking the entire time?" But they did, and they are funny little things.

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:41 pm ]
Post subject:
BacktotheFuture wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting How can "bad acting" be considered a mistake? I'm saying every movie has flaws. Bad acting can lead to a bad movie. Movies are carried on the actor's part. If the actor is bad, then the movie is ultimately flawed. Every movie has a weak link. That's all I'm saying. I guess I don't think the perfect movie has ever been made - and never will be. You're confusing the site then. It's not about how the movie is, it's about "oh look at that a camera guy in the background." You're confusing it big time. I know, I know. I know what the site is for, and I got off on my own little trip. Dont worry, I realized it. I should have taken out my first post, but then Algren had to come along :wink: Don't worry, I know what is on the site. Heh. I'm not that stupid.

Author:	BacktotheFuture [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:
zach wrote: BacktotheFuture wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting How can "bad acting" be considered a mistake? I'm saying every movie has flaws. Bad acting can lead to a bad movie. Movies are carried on the actor's part. If the actor is bad, then the movie is ultimately flawed. Every movie has a weak link. That's all I'm saying. I guess I don't think the perfect movie has ever been made - and never will be. You're confusing the site then. It's not about how the movie is, it's about "oh look at that a camera guy in the background." You're confusing it big time. I know, I know. I know what the site is for, and I got off on my own little trip. Dont worry, I realized it. I should have taken out my first post, but then Algren had to come along :wink: Don't worry, I know what is on the site. Heh. I'm not that stupid. Ok cuz for a second I thought you were.

Author:	Maximus [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:
BacktotheFuture wrote: zach wrote: BacktotheFuture wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: Algren wrote: zach wrote: EVERY movie has mistakes Not true. Yes it is. There is no film that is not flawed in some way, whether it is based on production, continuty, fact, or performance. How do you mean performance? acting How can "bad acting" be considered a mistake? I'm saying every movie has flaws. Bad acting can lead to a bad movie. Movies are carried on the actor's part. If the actor is bad, then the movie is ultimately flawed. Every movie has a weak link. That's all I'm saying. I guess I don't think the perfect movie has ever been made - and never will be. You're confusing the site then. It's not about how the movie is, it's about "oh look at that a camera guy in the background." You're confusing it big time. I know, I know. I know what the site is for, and I got off on my own little trip. Dont worry, I realized it. I should have taken out my first post, but then Algren had to come along :wink: Don't worry, I know what is on the site. Heh. I'm not that stupid. Ok cuz for a second I thought you were. Hehe. I know. My bad

Author:	Mister Ecks [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:
Passion of the Christ had a mistake? Jesus would not be proud.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/