World of KJ
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

Pic Of The SILVER SURFER And What He'll Look Like In F4-2
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=25294		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  STEVE ROGERS [ Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:25 am ]
Post subject:  Pic Of The SILVER SURFER And What He'll Look Like In F4-2
http://www.superherohype.com/forums/sho ... p?t=257129

Looks damn good, really it does and if FOX and WETA pull this off, this movie could be the X2 of this franchise..
Author:  Jmart [ Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:56 am ]
Post subject: 
[font=century gothic]I love the fact that in the first post it says.....[/font]

Quote:
I found this design on concept artist Miles Teves official site!
Though it looks a lot like him i'm not 100% sure if this is the Silver Surfer. I'm also not sure if its for FF2 since its not on the site but 'hidden' on it (if that makes any sense) and Teves doesn't have FF2 on his credit list either.


[font=century gothic]Well I'm sold.

I'll wait for something official.[/font]
Author:  STEVE ROGERS [ Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:44 am ]
Post subject: 
jmart007 wrote:
[font=century gothic]I love the fact that in the first post it says.....[/font]

Quote:
I found this design on concept artist Miles Teves official site!
Though it looks a lot like him i'm not 100% sure if this is the Silver Surfer. I'm also not sure if its for FF2 since its not on the site but 'hidden' on it (if that makes any sense) and Teves doesn't have FF2 on his credit list either.


[font=century gothic]Well I'm sold.

I'll wait for something official.[/font]


Oh come on.. How many ways can they possibly make this character look any different than the comic??? He looks like T-1000 with a Galactic Surfboard underneath him.. What do you want him to look like??
Author:  Thegun [ Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:01 pm ]
Post subject: 
BKB you have thing for awful CGI don't you. Very unoriginal and looks like it will be as believable as Scooby Doo or Garfield with Live action characters.
Author:  El Maskado [ Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:07 pm ]
Post subject: 
Looks like some guy dipped in silver paint.......
Author:  Thegun [ Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:21 am ]
Post subject: 
Looking at it a little more, I suppose thats the best it could look like, but I still feel the CGI will look painfully fake in the final product. He just doesnt look realistic at all to me.
Author:  STEVE ROGERS [ Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:46 am ]
Post subject: 
Thegun wrote:
BKB you have thing for awful CGI don't you. Very unoriginal and looks like it will be as believable as Scooby Doo or Garfield with Live action characters.


And you have a penchant for nitpicking the fuc* out of movie's like some old bag and have little to no imagination whatsoever and furthermore, if I were one of your friend's seeing a movie with you and you started in on all this who, what, where, when, and why bullshi*, I'd beat the hell out of you, LITERALLY.. Your problem is is that your just not happy with any movie you see it seems.. At least with me, there's a little leeway, but you just nitpick stuff to death, much like you did with SAW III.. You ask too many questions about a movie to the point of ridiculousness..
Author:  Thegun [ Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:39 am ]
Post subject: 
CASINO_BKB wrote:
Thegun wrote:
BKB you have thing for awful CGI don't you. Very unoriginal and looks like it will be as believable as Scooby Doo or Garfield with Live action characters.


And you have a penchant for nitpicking the fuc* out of movie's like some old bag and have little to no imagination whatsoever and furthermore, if I were one of your friend's seeing a movie with you and you started in on all this who, what, where, when, and why bullshi*, I'd beat the hell out of you, LITERALLY.. Your problem is is that your just not happy with any movie you see it seems.. At least with me, there's a little leeway, but you just nitpick stuff to death, much like you did with SAW III.. You ask too many questions about a movie to the point of ridiculousness..


Not really, just here.

Hey I enjoyed Saw III, except for huge obvious plotholes, I didnt list them until someone asked for them. Im perfectly happy with most special effects. Speilberg is my favorite director of all time, despite so many people saying thats so cliche. Screw them though, Imagination is what Im all about. Don't get mad at me if on three occasions I didnt like Marvel's choices in the special effects department.

I loved the effects of Poseidon, X3, T2 T3, SW, LOTR, and I thought the first Fantastic Four had very good effects. Silver Surfer looks like a step down in my opinion. The only times I've ever complained about effects were Hulk, Spidey3 and now here. I didnt mind the effects in Garfield or Scooby Doo because thats what I expected, this is below the standards of the first film in my opinion.

I dont ask too many questions, I just have a more keen eye than most people from all the stuff I know. I love that you call me a massive nitpicker when really your basing my comments off of Saw III, I'm usually one of the easier people to entertain on this board as far as movies go.

And Please BKB theres no leeway about you. I go into any movie I see with an open mind. Hell I even expect to love Spiderman 3 despite hating the 2nd and only liking the first. You were going to badmouth Superman Returns and Casino Royale no matter what and you know it because of your pre mindsets. I dont think I gave a single film I saw this year undre a B, maybe one and that was a C+. The two films you were predispose to hate you said you liked and still gave them a D+ or C-. I'll see the Fantastic Four because I really liked the first and everything so far looks pretty good.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/