Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 2:05 am



Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 The 2004 Film of the Year 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
Eagle wrote:
I thought all the LotR movies were overrated with exception of FOTR.

They were still amazing and the best trilogy ever, better than Star Wars or Indiana Jones.

Personally ... Somethings Gotta Give.

KJ





Quote:
Yes. For me it was Mystic River due to some fantastic performances.



Ok, apparently, there ARE people who did pick other films. I'll use Mr Green now: :mrgreen:



I bet you Archangel's 2004 pick is Phantom of the Opera. :) I'll only bet 5 cents. :)

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:36 pm
Profile WWW
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
lovemerox wrote:
jb007 wrote:
box_2005 wrote:
We disagree, that's fine. You consider Shrek 2 2004's film, and I consider The Passion to be of greater significance. Perfectly ok, there's no harm in disgareeing.


Amen to that :)


Unless of course you tell him Dante is an embarrasment to fiction writing


Joe Dante, the Movie Director was a fiction writer too. I did not know about that.

@ Box, just kidding :)

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:37 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
jb007 wrote:
Killuminati510 wrote:
box_2005 wrote:
jb007 wrote:
How can it be the movie of the year?

For all its controversy and fanatical support by evangelicals, a movie about Jesus Christ was beaten by an Ogre and a man bit by a Spider.

Most Controversial Movie of the year Yes

Movie of the Year NO


Box office is only one aspect. How many articles were written on Shrek 2?


Both Shrek 2 and Sm2 were utterly forgettable. Variety even had an article on how little impact they had on culture in 2004 despite their massive grosses.


Note

I think this should be moved to the MOVIE Section. People are mistaking its intentions.

JB makes no sense, its basically like saying Finding Nemo is a better movie then Godfather because more people saw it, even though most of the people who saw Finding Nemo were in diapers.


Go check the reviews for POTC. Shrek 2 and SM 2 was better reviewed. More people watched Shrek 2 and SM2. They were better critically and financially. Neither critics nor the people picked POTC as the movie of the year. DVD sales, Shrek 2 beat it easily.

In what other way can Shrek 2 and SM 2 need to show their dominance over POTC?


Critics already had their mind made up on the movie before even watching it. Who cares about sales, like I said Finding Nemo sold more then the Godfather, doesnt make it a better movie though.

If you need to use critics & sales to prove your point then I feel sorry for you.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Last edited by Joker's Thug #3 on Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:38 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
This might be a strange way of putting it, but:


Did anyone else feel Mystic River had a rich texture?

I mean, the atmosphere, etc. From the first, what, minute? it was dark and brooding and gloomy. That's a great achievement on the part of Mr. Eastwood, and the actors, of course, Robbins probably being the best performance, imo.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:38 pm
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post 
Mystic River was a great film, no doubt about it.

KJ

Anyone here see closer?


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:39 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
Actually. As for your debate between Finding Nemo and The Godfather...

Finding Nemo isn't nearly as flawed. It flows well and never loses the audiences' attention. It's got a nice message that most people can understand, and it's very pretty to look at and listen to, with good performances from mostly everyone.

The Godfather is on my top 20, but it's a much slower film that takes its time. Also, the message of corruption takes a while to understand (but, it's enjoyable in the mean time), and because of it's "epic" state, there are tons of plot holes and questions left unanswered.

I think Finding Nemo is the better film (impeccable!), but The Godfather is the bigger achievement.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:41 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
torrino wrote:
Actually. As for your debate between Finding Nemo and The Godfather...

Finding Nemo isn't nearly as flawed. It flows well and never loses the audiences' attention. It's got a nice message that most people can understand, and it's very pretty to look at and listen to, with good performances from mostly everyone.

The Godfather is on my top 20, but it's a much slower film that takes its time. Also, the message of corruption takes a while to understand (but, it's enjoyable in the mean time), and because of it's "epic" state, there are tons of plot holes and questions left unanswered.

I think Finding Nemo is the better film (impeccable!), but The Godfather is the bigger achievement.


You think a cartoon movie about a fish is better than the Godfather! :shock:

I respect your opinion though :wink:

_________________
Image


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:43 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
Killuminati510 wrote:
Critics already had their mind made up on the movie before even watching it. Who cares about sales, like I said Finding Nemo sold more then the Godfather, doesnt make it a better movie though.

If you need to use critics & sales to prove your point then I feel sorry for you.


Your reasoning is juvenile since POTC is no Godfather :) In fact not even in the same universe.

When Moviebuffs like IMDB, Critics, moviegoers have all taken Shrek 2 over POTC that is the majority opinion. If you like POTC better, good for you.

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:47 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
lovemerox wrote:
torrino wrote:
Actually. As for your debate between Finding Nemo and The Godfather...

Finding Nemo isn't nearly as flawed. It flows well and never loses the audiences' attention. It's got a nice message that most people can understand, and it's very pretty to look at and listen to, with good performances from mostly everyone.

The Godfather is on my top 20, but it's a much slower film that takes its time. Also, the message of corruption takes a while to understand (but, it's enjoyable in the mean time), and because of it's "epic" state, there are tons of plot holes and questions left unanswered.

I think Finding Nemo is the better film (impeccable!), but The Godfather is the bigger achievement.


You think a cartoon movie about a fish is better than the Godfather! :shock:

I respect your opinion though :wink:

You didn't listen. Or read it. Did you?

The Godfather's on my top 20 (if you want the frickin' truth...The Godfather is #12, while The Godfather Part II is #1...yep. numero uno). Finding Nemo isn't even in my top 150. However, as a film, I think Finding Nemo is flawless. Although I wouldn't want to watch it over, it's a wonderful product that can't disappoint and bore the viewer (or...anyone who can judge the film past the somewhat used message, even though the message alone is pulled off brilliantly and concisely). Blah.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:52 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
torrino wrote:
lovemerox wrote:
torrino wrote:
Actually. As for your debate between Finding Nemo and The Godfather...

Finding Nemo isn't nearly as flawed. It flows well and never loses the audiences' attention. It's got a nice message that most people can understand, and it's very pretty to look at and listen to, with good performances from mostly everyone.

The Godfather is on my top 20, but it's a much slower film that takes its time. Also, the message of corruption takes a while to understand (but, it's enjoyable in the mean time), and because of it's "epic" state, there are tons of plot holes and questions left unanswered.

I think Finding Nemo is the better film (impeccable!), but The Godfather is the bigger achievement.


You think a cartoon movie about a fish is better than the Godfather! :shock:

I respect your opinion though :wink:

You didn't listen. Or read it. Did you?

The Godfather's on my top 20 (if you want the frickin' truth...The Godfather is #12, while The Godfather Part II is #1...yep. numero uno). Finding Nemo isn't even in my top 150. However, as a film, I think Finding Nemo is flawless. Although I wouldn't want to watch it over, it's a wonderful product that can't disappoint and bore the viewer (or...anyone who can judge the film past the somewhat used message, even though the message alone is pulled off brilliantly and concisely). Blah.



Ahhh, Apologies for reading your previous post wrong
Sorry :D

_________________
Image


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:53 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
As for the movie of the year, I have yet to see Million Dollar Baby, Sideways, Aviator, or House of Flying Daggers. After I see all those I will know.

BTW, my movie of the year as of today,

Finding Neverland

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:53 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
And my movie of the year...for the past two years...is...

a tie between Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and The Motorcycle Diaries.

And, considering that makes 3 Focus Features flicks in a row (Lost in Translation last year), I better start seeing what films they have coming out next year so I can plan accordingly, hehe.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:07 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28292
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Is this for the biggest film of the year, that had a huge impact, and what-not? Or is this for our most favorite film of the year?

If the former, I would pick Passion, Fahrenheit, Collateral, and The Polar Express. If the latter, Saw, Shaun of the Dead, Dawn of the Dead or The Grudge (gotta love the horror genre).

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:26 pm
Profile
The French Dutch Boy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 10266
Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
Post 
At this point, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is my favourite film of the year.

PEACE, Mike ;)


Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:27 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 18876
Location: San Diego
Post 
Eagle wrote:
Mystic River was a great film, no doubt about it.

KJ

Anyone here see closer?


Ooo, see Closer, I'm interested to see what you think of it. :D I myself loved it.

Kill Bill Volume 2 is my favorite film of the year, Eternal Sunshine is SO close though.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 10909
Post 
Out of all the films of this year i think that in 50 years TPOTC will be remembered the most.IMO its the best film of the year by far.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:01 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
neo_wolf wrote:
Out of all the films of this year i think that in 50 years TPOTC will be remembered the most.IMO its the best film of the year by far.


You mean you think its the best film..acting, direction ect....?

_________________
Image


Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:04 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
lovemerox wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
Out of all the films of this year i think that in 50 years TPOTC will be remembered the most.IMO its the best film of the year by far.


You mean you think its the best film..acting, direction ect....?



It's certainly Oscar worthy in a number of ways. I dont know how they could have pulled off better performances. Seriously, the most scrutinized piece of work, it's so easy to be picky. Mind you, some of the language was off accent-wise (you could hear Bellucci's Italian accent), but meh, small problem.

Stunning cinematography, wonderful soundtrack.


But it won't get any Oscars. Mind you, I don't use the Oscars as a good measuring rod anyways (though it is helpful in general conversation).

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:09 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
Post 
box_2005 wrote:
lovemerox wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
Out of all the films of this year i think that in 50 years TPOTC will be remembered the most.IMO its the best film of the year by far.


You mean you think its the best film..acting, direction ect....?



It's certainly Oscar worthy in a number of ways. I dont know how they could have pulled off better performances. Seriously, the most scrutinized piece of work, it's so easy to be picky. Mind you, some of the language was off accent-wise (you could hear Bellucci's Italian accent), but meh, small problem.

Stunning cinematography, wonderful soundtrack.


But it won't get any Oscars. Mind you, I don't use the Oscars as a good measuring rod anyways (though it is helpful in general conversation).



meh...Passion was alright. I was expecting to be incredibly moved..ect. It was way overhyped in my opinion. It upset me because I thought I would like it more than I did.I also felt the gore was a bit to much, it was basically what half the movie was comprised of.

I love the camera work and score though

_________________
Image


Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:16 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post 
lovemerox wrote:


meh...Passion was alright. I was expecting to be incredibly moved..ect. It was way overhyped in my opinion. It upset me because I thought I would like it more than I did.I also felt the gore was a bit to much, it was basically what half the movie was comprised of.

I love the camera work and score though



More than any other film I have come across, this one expects an incredible amount from its audience. That's why it's so hard for me to give it any decent grade- I can't back away from it and look at it objectively. It evaporates as soon as I do that.

Keep in mind that it's success was a huge accident; the film was made for a specific audience, not for all of America.

But everyone saw it. In New York City, for example, it ranks above ROTK on the municipal all-time chart*. It's strongest theatres were in New York City, not in the Red states.

It pulled in an audience way beyond it's capacity to accomodate. I think that, above all, is it's greatest achievement.


For credibility's sake:

NYC's Top 10 All-Time

1 TITANIC $38,421,133
2 SPIDER-MAN $29,794,001
3 STAR WARS: EP.I-PHANTOM MENACE $26,304,857
4 SPIDER-MAN 2 $26,139,904
5 SHREK 2 $25,010,090
6 THE SIXTH SENSE $22,897,000
7 THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST $21,826,514
8 JURASSIC PARK $21,622,129
9 LORD OF THE RINGS: RETURN KING $21,178,246
10 THE MATRIX RELOADED $21,058,478

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Last edited by Box on Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:21 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
I actually felt that the gore was necessary, for once. I'm tired of seeing films about Jesus that are just Hollywood-ized inspirational stories, and don't show the true horrors of what occured. Truth be told, the Romans excelled at torture, they took pride in it. And I can imagine that the true event was even worse then what was shown on screen.

That being said, I do not think TPoTC was the best film of the year, nor will it win any Oscars.

I'd pick Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind myself.

_________________
See above.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:24 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 10909
Post 
lovemerox wrote:
neo_wolf wrote:
Out of all the films of this year i think that in 50 years TPOTC will be remembered the most.IMO its the best film of the year by far.


You mean you think its the best film..acting, direction ect....?


Yep.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:01 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post Re: The 2004 Film of the Year
box_2005 wrote:
Fahrenheit 9/11, for more or less the same reason as The Passion. Though, keep in mind: It made less than 1/3rd of the money, and it failed- Bush won.


How do you know that Bush wouldn't have even won by more without this film? :roll: From what I saw, Bush won by the lowest margin of any incumbent President -- not a ringing endorsement of the American public by any means.

Strange how we judge films based on whether they achieved a certain political effect or not, hm? We used to deal with whether they were good films or not.

By that standard, "Shawshank Redemption" must really suck because we still have bad prisons.

I find that alot of people who are pushing the Passion and dissing F 9/11 (or vice versa) are doing so for political/religious and not film reasons. They like the films because they agree with them, and not for whether they were well made or not, and then they convince themselves that it is well made to justify their feelings.

Mind you, I haven't seen either one, since I really don't like being preached to, even when I agree. Plus, I agree with what Eric Idle said when asked if he was going to go see "Passion": "Nah, I hate snuff movies."


Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:32 pm
Profile WWW
2.71828183

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: please delete me
Post 
Eagle wrote:
I thought all the LotR movies were overrated with exception of FOTR.


Ditto, the best mvoei this year for me was Before Sunset followed by Closer.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:37 pm
Profile
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Ripper wrote:
Eagle wrote:
I thought all the LotR movies were overrated with exception of FOTR.


Ditto, the best mvoei this year for me was Before Sunset followed by Closer.


Yeah, most of the films were very over-rated. I haven't picked my favorite of the year yet, but currently it is Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

_________________
See above.


Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:44 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.