World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Unbelievable Lord of the Rings Event http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=24227 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Anonymous [ Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Unbelievable Lord of the Rings Event |
Having survived Trilogy Tuesday, I can appreciate what the Alamo Drafthouse is doing. http://www.originalalamo.com/downtown/f ... ow_id=3243 LORD OF THE RINGS - THE HOBBIT FEAST 10:30 AM Peter Jackson, 2001-2003, 35mm, 12 hours, PG, $88 You've got to hand it to those hobbits, they sure know how to eat. As any self respecting fan can tell you, it takes a lot of fuel to drive the hobbit engine. That's why they eat seven times a day. Exective chef John Bullington has created a seven meal feast, one for each of the different hobbit mealtimes (1st breakfast, 2nd breakfast, elevensies, etc.), spread out over the twelve hours it takes to watch the entire middle earth trilogy. Interpreted from actual meals referenced in the books, the Hobbit Feast is the ultimate Lord of the Rings sensory experience. 35 MM EXTENDED EDITIONS OF THE FIRST TWO FILMS AND THEATRICAL RELEASE VERSION OF RETURN OF THE KING WITH FOOD PAIRING AT ALL SEVEN HOBBIT EATING TIMES! First Breakfast Fresh Hens eggs, nice crispy bacon, grilled mushrooms and orange slice (Substitute veggie bacon for veggie option) Second Breakfast Strawberries and Cream Elevensies Pan Seared Sausage and tomatoes with cheeses, cabbage and pickles (Substitute veggie sausage for pork sausage with veggie option) Luncheon Braised Spareribs with mashed potatoes, roast carrots (Substitute marinated mushrooms for spareribs with veggie option) Afternoon Tea Baby greens with garlic blackberry vinaigrette, cheese herb galette, served with tea cookies Dinner Stewed Coney (rabbit) with taters, carrot, and leek, fresh garden herbs with crusty bread (Substitute a root vegetable stew in veggie option) Supper Swirl of tomato and spinach soups wild mushroom crouton, apple pie A DELICIOUS VEGETARIAN OPTION IS AVAILABLE IF YOU CONTACT US IN ADVANCE BY E-MAILING KAREN@ORIGINALALAMO.COM!!! Event pricing: $21 movie admission $8 unlimited NA beverages $50 7 hobbit meals $9 15% gratuity $88 total ticket cost This event will run for approximately 12 hours with 30 minute breaks in between films beginning when the credits start to roll and ending when the next film begins. |
Author: | Libs [ Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I think I would cry if I was forced to go to that. Even the food wouldn't be enough to cut it for me. |
Author: | kypade [ Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
wow... the theater by my mom's did the "trilogy tuesday" thing last month...only it was on a saturday. I was actually there the very weekend they did it, but I didnt find out about it until the Sunday after. : ( They're doing it with the Potters this month, october 28 i think...it's funny looking at the "buy tickets" page and seeing a showtime of 720 minutes or so. i'm tempted to go (only 12 bucks), but i dunno if i could sit through the first 2 films again. |
Author: | Anonymous [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Trilogy Tuesday wasn't that bad. I have a lot a stamina. But I was hungry, even though pizzas and such were delivered to the theatre. |
Author: | Erendis [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I did a Trilogy Saturday with the theatrical cuts, and that was long enough. I can't imagine doing it with the extended editions, even for only the two movies. But this sounds pretty doable, because it looks like it's in a restaurant-type place, where you can move around or sit around tables instead of being stuck in rows of seats. And since everybody there has seen all these movies 20 times each already, it's not like you have to stay prim and proper and silent. I'm guessing people can move around and chat in the back. This is fun stuff. And actually, the $88 price tag is very reasonable. |
Author: | Anonymous [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The original TT had the two extended cuts plus the theatrical ROTK. Even though I've seen the films repeatedly, I would still demand silence during the screening. I love the Alamo Drafthouse, they're also doing a Kill Bill screening with QT in attendance. http://www.originalalamo.com/downtown/f ... ow_id=4106 quentin tarantino live in person to present KILL BILL: THE UNSEEN, UNCENSORED FULL-LENGTH CUT DIR. Quentin Tarantino,2004, 35mm, 245 min, NR Downtown October 14, 10:00 PM By the new millennium, film had turned away from two-fisted, white-knuckled exploitation-fueled entertainment. Hollywood's toughs were on the decline as they became gentler action heroes with a renewed conscience regarding violence. Enter: The Bride. Tarantino and Thurman's vengeance-hungry lady warrior got our hearts racing (and blood spraying) in no time, just like the good old days...only better, with all the cinematic glory of ultramodern effects work and QT�s distinctly bold signature. Equal parts revenge picture, martial arts epic and something entirely new, KILL BILL blew away audiences internationally and brought widespread attention to genres of film often only appreciated by hardcore enthusiasts. A tribute to all things fun on film, the action masterpiece is now being presented in its purest form: an uncut, uncompromised, viciously exciting 245-minute version, with every scene (including the infamous House of Blue Leaves showdown) now in full, blazing color. This rare screening is sure to be one of the most intensely satisfying movie experiences you're likely to have. Ever. |
Author: | MadGez [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
loyalfromlondon wrote: The original TT had the two extended cuts plus the theatrical ROTK. Even though I've seen the films repeatedly, I would still demand silence during the screening. I love the Alamo Drafthouse, they're also doing a Kill Bill screening with QT in attendance. http://www.originalalamo.com/downtown/f ... ow_id=4106 quentin tarantino live in person to present KILL BILL: THE UNSEEN, UNCENSORED FULL-LENGTH CUT DIR. Quentin Tarantino,2004, 35mm, 245 min, NR Downtown October 14, 10:00 PM By the new millennium, film had turned away from two-fisted, white-knuckled exploitation-fueled entertainment. Hollywood's toughs were on the decline as they became gentler action heroes with a renewed conscience regarding violence. Enter: The Bride. Tarantino and Thurman's vengeance-hungry lady warrior got our hearts racing (and blood spraying) in no time, just like the good old days...only better, with all the cinematic glory of ultramodern effects work and QT�s distinctly bold signature. Equal parts revenge picture, martial arts epic and something entirely new, KILL BILL blew away audiences internationally and brought widespread attention to genres of film often only appreciated by hardcore enthusiasts. A tribute to all things fun on film, the action masterpiece is now being presented in its purest form: an uncut, uncompromised, viciously exciting 245-minute version, with every scene (including the infamous House of Blue Leaves showdown) now in full, blazing color. This rare screening is sure to be one of the most intensely satisfying movie experiences you're likely to have. Ever. I would definitely do the LOTR marathon If I was there. The TT Extended Edition is a must. ROTK is probably better theatrical. And Kill Bill!!!! Damn that would be heaven. Will the full length cut ever see the light of day on DVD?? |
Author: | Anonymous [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
ROTK extended sucked ass. There, I said it. |
Author: | The Dark Shape [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Towers is the worst Extended Edition because it significantly hurts pacing (stop... cutting... to Treebeard!). ROTK is probably the most inconsequential, but there are some gems there. |
Author: | MadGez [ Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
loyalfromlondon wrote: ROTK extended sucked ass. There, I said it. Totally agree. Made me like the film a little less. Towers EE is much much better than theatricl though. |
Author: | Erendis [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I don't disagree with you guys; the EE's were not as good as the ultra loonies make out. I take a middle ground. I would say that only about 5-10 minutes of each EE could have gone into the theatrical version; most of it (I thought) badly needed exposition. The rest should have stayed on the cutting room floor. I have a list of what to put back in, but won't inflict it on you. |
Author: | Anonymous [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Erendis wrote: I don't disagree with you guys; the EE's were not as good as the ultra loonies make out. I take a middle ground. I would say that only about 5-10 minutes of each EE could have gone into the theatrical version; most of it (I thought) badly needed exposition. The rest should have stayed on the cutting room floor. I have a list of what to put back in, but won't inflict it on you. please do. ![]() For me, nothing is quite as bad as ROTK EE ruining the arrival of the Army of the Dead. |
Author: | Erendis [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Okay... Yeah, I don't like that scene with the Army of the Dead taking over the Corsair ships. I'm surprised they even filmed it. The whole idea was that Aragorn's arrival was supposed to be a surprise. On the whole, the exact order of the events at the Pelennor battle, as all the respective armies show up one after the other, is Tolkien's strongest writing. PJ cut it rather differently, and it's much weaker. For example, I hated cutting that Eowyn/Witch King battle in half. And for geeky book reasons, the King of the Dead and the Witch King should never have been on the same battlefield. Anyway, this is off the top of my head, so be gentle: EE stuff to add into FotR:
Add into RotK:
|
Author: | Jeff [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
MadGez wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: ROTK extended sucked ass. There, I said it. Totally agree. Made me like the film a little less. Towers EE is much much better than theatricl though. I never finished the RoTK EE, its the only one I don't own as well. Watched about 1/3rd of it, hated it and turned it off. |
Author: | Anonymous [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
@ Erendis ![]() I completely agree with everything you posted minus one thing. I enjoy bits of levity so I was happy with the drinking game. ![]() |
Author: | Erendis [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
loyalfromlondon wrote: I enjoy bits of levity so I was happy with the drinking game. ![]() At least admit that when it comes to uttering "game over," Bill Paxton totally pwns Orlando Bloom. Anyway, thanks! The whole LotR thing got me interested in identifying what goes into quality screenwriting (and editing), and LotR has plenty of examples of both good writing and bad (more good than bad). I think of the EE set as a film-school-in-a-box. |
Author: | MadGez [ Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Erendis wrote: Okay... Yeah, I don't like that scene with the Army of the Dead taking over the Corsair ships. I'm surprised they even filmed it. The whole idea was that Aragorn's arrival was supposed to be a surprise. On the whole, the exact order of the events at the Pelennor battle, as all the respective armies show up one after the other, is Tolkien's strongest writing. PJ cut it rather differently, and it's much weaker. For example, I hated cutting that Eowyn/Witch King battle in half. And for geeky book reasons, the King of the Dead and the Witch King should never have been on the same battlefield. Anyway, this is off the top of my head, so be gentle: EE stuff to add into FotR:
Add into RotK:
Fantastic Erendis. Basically everything you mentioned above should go into the Theatrical films. I thought TTT EE showed the most improvement over the theatrical. I absolutely love the Osgiliath scenes, especially not knowing much about Faramir and his role in the saga as I havnt read the books (but love the films). I thought it was just me that found the Army of the Dead taking over the ships to be a weak scene. But apparently not. And the CGI was terrible. If you dont mind and if you have the spare time - would you be able to clarify for me: * Reasons why the King of the Dead and The Witch King couldnt be on the same battlefield? (I thought they played down the Wicth King in the final duel - even though they played him up somewhat before. It was anti-climactic.) * Also what happened of his threat of "I will break him" in reference to Gandalf? * How was the whole Pelennor battle played out in the book (vs the film)? As you said this was JRRT's best writing. Thanks ![]() |
Author: | Erendis [ Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:42 am ] |
Post subject: | |
MadGez wrote: I absolutely love the Osgiliath scenes, especially not knowing much about Faramir and his role in the saga as I havnt read the books (but love the films). * Reasons why the King of the Dead and The Witch King couldnt be on the same battlefield? (I thought they played down the Wicth King in the final duel - even though they played him up somewhat before. It was anti-climactic.) * Also what happened of his threat of "I will break him" in reference to Gandalf? * How was the whole Pelennor battle played out in the book (vs the film)? As you said this was JRRT's best writing. Thanks ![]() Absolutely. ![]() ![]() Faramir Faramir is THE MAN. He's much more perfect in the books that in the movie, and the kind of man that all those geeks that play D&D dream about being. Faz gets pages and pages of monologue in Henneth Annuin (the cave with the waterfall). The Osgiliath flashback is one of the things that PJ did VERY well. It's only mentioned briefly in the books. The City of Osgiliath straddled the river, and Gondor and Mordor fought over it for years, which is why it was in ruins. During the same summer that Frodo had the ring in the Shire (FotR), Faramir and Boromir managed to break the last bridge over the river, which separated the city in half. They had to give up one side, but held the other side. The flashback in TTT is the victory celebration after that battle. We fanboys labeled it as: "It's Miller Time!" Of course then Boromir is sent to Rivendell to ask Elrond about that dream he had. Boromir arrives at Rivendell just when the wounded Frodo does (FotR). Then later, in RotK, the Mordor forces strike back in Osgiliath, and put down a new bridge, and you see the armies marching over it. The Events at Minas Tirith, including Witch King: From what I can remember, here's what happens in the BOOK. It might not be exact:
That's a loooooooooong time to go without seeing Aragorn. You're so busy with the Pippin Gandalf Faramir Denethor Witch King Theoden Eowyn Merry, battle going good, battle going bad, battle going good, battle going bad, battle going REALLY bad, that you have completely forgotten about Aragorn, and I mean completely. I truly thought that the feeble Rohan army was ALL that was left of the good guys, and they were going to lose, and then when the Corsiars showed up, I was all like Game over man! Game over! So the first time I read Aragorn unfurling that banner on the ship, I burst into tears. ![]() Tolkien does the exact opposite of intercutting, just to preserve this surprise. This is one reason why LotR was considered unfilmable. It's not just that you need CGI for all the monsters. Tolkien uses chronology as a literary device. Great for surprises, but very difficult to adapt to a film plot that an audience can understand. Witch King vs. King of the Dead: There are two reasons these two never meet. First, in the book, the Dead never go to the Minas Tirith. In the books, we know that there are thousands of Gondorians from the countryside trying to get to the capital city, Minas Tirith, to reinforce it. Aragorn, with the Dead, find the Corsairs locked in battle with those Gondorian reinforcements. The Dead overthrow the Corsairs, and Aragorn lets the Dead go right there. Aragorn then takes the boats and puts the Gondorian reinforcements on the boats and sails to Minas Tirith. Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, in their condensation of the story, wisely combined the Dead and the reinforcements to make it simpler and more exciting. Most of the fans, except for purists like Bradley Witherberry, have no problem with that. However... The second reason: In the books, and briefly in the movie, the prophesy is that "no living man" can kill the Witch King. The King of the Dead is not living, he's a cursed green dead guy. So, technically, HE could kill the Witch King. This really saps the accomplishment of Eowyn and Merry, both of whom are "living," but not "men." In the books, there is never this conflict because the Dead never get to the battle. But even with the Dead there, PJ could have avoided this by finishing the Eowyn battle before Aragorn and the Dead get there. But because he intercut it, it's confusing. The audience sees that the King of the Dead was there, and hey, he's not living. Why didn't Eowyn just wait for His Green Majesty ![]() It all hinges on that word "living." Yes yes, even though it's only one word, it's a BIG deal to fans. That's why they're called geeks. (if you really want to dig into geek arguements over the way something is worded, try asking an LotR Loonie if a Balrog has wings. ![]() I hope that helps. |
Author: | MadGez [ Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:26 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Erendis! You are all class! ![]() I will be re-reading your post tonight and responding then. Thankyou! |
Author: | MadGez [ Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Erendis wrote: MadGez wrote: I absolutely love the Osgiliath scenes, especially not knowing much about Faramir and his role in the saga as I havnt read the books (but love the films). * Reasons why the King of the Dead and The Witch King couldnt be on the same battlefield? (I thought they played down the Wicth King in the final duel - even though they played him up somewhat before. It was anti-climactic.) * Also what happened of his threat of "I will break him" in reference to Gandalf? * How was the whole Pelennor battle played out in the book (vs the film)? As you said this was JRRT's best writing. Thanks ![]() Absolutely. ![]() ![]() Faramir Faramir is THE MAN. He's much more perfect in the books that in the movie, and the kind of man that all those geeks that play D&D dream about being. Faz gets pages and pages of monologue in Henneth Annuin (the cave with the waterfall). The Osgiliath flashback is one of the things that PJ did VERY well. It's only mentioned briefly in the books. The City of Osgiliath straddled the river, and Gondor and Mordor fought over it for years, which is why it was in ruins. During the same summer that Frodo had the ring in the Shire (FotR), Faramir and Boromir managed to break the last bridge over the river, which separated the city in half. They had to give up one side, but held the other side. The flashback in TTT is the victory celebration after that battle. We fanboys labeled it as: "It's Miller Time!" Of course then Boromir is sent to Rivendell to ask Elrond about that dream he had. Boromir arrives at Rivendell just when the wounded Frodo does (FotR). Then later, in RotK, the Mordor forces strike back in Osgiliath, and put down a new bridge, and you see the armies marching over it. The Events at Minas Tirith, including Witch King: From what I can remember, here's what happens in the BOOK. It might not be exact:
That's a loooooooooong time to go without seeing Aragorn. You're so busy with the Pippin Gandalf Faramir Denethor Witch King Theoden Eowyn Merry, battle going good, battle going bad, battle going good, battle going bad, battle going REALLY bad, that you have completely forgotten about Aragorn, and I mean completely. I truly thought that the feeble Rohan army was ALL that was left of the good guys, and they were going to lose, and then when the Corsiars showed up, I was all like Game over man! Game over! So the first time I read Aragorn unfurling that banner on the ship, I burst into tears. ![]() Tolkien does the exact opposite of intercutting, just to preserve this surprise. This is one reason why LotR was considered unfilmable. It's not just that you need CGI for all the monsters. Tolkien uses chronology as a literary device. Great for surprises, but very difficult to adapt to a film plot that an audience can understand. Witch King vs. King of the Dead: There are two reasons these two never meet. First, in the book, the Dead never go to the Minas Tirith. In the books, we know that there are thousands of Gondorians from the countryside trying to get to the capital city, Minas Tirith, to reinforce it. Aragorn, with the Dead, find the Corsairs locked in battle with those Gondorian reinforcements. The Dead overthrow the Corsairs, and Aragorn lets the Dead go right there. Aragorn then takes the boats and puts the Gondorian reinforcements on the boats and sails to Minas Tirith. Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, in their condensation of the story, wisely combined the Dead and the reinforcements to make it simpler and more exciting. Most of the fans, except for purists like Bradley Witherberry, have no problem with that. However... The second reason: In the books, and briefly in the movie, the prophesy is that "no living man" can kill the Witch King. The King of the Dead is not living, he's a cursed green dead guy. So, technically, HE could kill the Witch King. This really saps the accomplishment of Eowyn and Merry, both of whom are "living," but not "men." In the books, there is never this conflict because the Dead never get to the battle. But even with the Dead there, PJ could have avoided this by finishing the Eowyn battle before Aragorn and the Dead get there. But because he intercut it, it's confusing. The audience sees that the King of the Dead was there, and hey, he's not living. Why didn't Eowyn just wait for His Green Majesty ![]() It all hinges on that word "living." Yes yes, even though it's only one word, it's a BIG deal to fans. That's why they're called geeks. (if you really want to dig into geek arguements over the way something is worded, try asking an LotR Loonie if a Balrog has wings. ![]() I hope that helps. Sorry for the late reply - but thanks for the above - it was an enjoyable read and perfect timing as I usually rewatch the trilogy every December. Its tradition! ![]() Firstly I have to say that when I saw FOTR and TTT in theatres - I was slightly dissapointed with both. But with both I grew to love them on second viewing (with TTT it was the Extended Edition). So I was all primed and ready for ROTK and this was the only one I loved immediately on first viewing. However, when I saw the EE a year later - I felt their was something off but couldn't pick what and you have just nailed it. The intercutting! I didnt realise this is what PJ did but it makes sense now looking back. Thats the part of the film I felt dragged and lacked the impact that it did in the theatre. I guess the whole "living man" thing isnt so bad if you havnt read the book. I never did think of that. I only took notice of the word "man" and didnt give "living" any thought. Again it works well in the theatrical film. Perhaps I was looking for a showdown between the Witch King and Gandalf. Also in the film they showed scenese of the Witch King putting on armour and preparing for battle. It was a good scene and quite ominous - but I guess it didnt get fulfilled - though I liked the Eowen/Theoden/Witch King final scenes. I did think the whole episode of Aragorn and the Corsiars showing up would have played out better had it followed the book. While I have no problem with the Army of the Dead marching through with the reinforcements - actually its better that way - but I thought the way the scene was filmed was anti-climactic (ie. green army haze sweeps in and ends the battle in seconds). As for Faramir - the TTT EE definitely does his character justice in comparison to the theatrical cut. Without seeing the TTT:EE I dont think much of the Denothor/Faramir/Boromir/Pippin/Gandalf ark in ROTK would have worked - well for me anyway. Oh and I thought the films played out the sense of dread and defeat (of the good guys) quite well, don't you? Again thanks for taking the time to explain the above. I look forward to re-watching the films and possibly reading the books aswell. ![]() --------------------- I've got a few mor questions that if you could answer (whenever you have time) would be great! I always hear about fans being upset as scenes being left out from the book etc. Mainly I hear about the Scouring of the Shire, the Death of Saruman and Tom Bombadil. What do you think about these things being left out of the films or being different from the books? Are there any parts of the book/s you think were not adapted well or could have been better? And what aspects were done perfectly or better than the book? And what new scenese that were not in the books worked? oh and does a Balrog have wings or not ![]() Thanks again. |
Author: | Shack [ Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:18 am ] |
Post subject: | |
WOW. Erendis is one amazingly dedicated LOTR fan, heh. ![]() |
Author: | Erendis [ Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Thanks for listening. ![]() And Shack, yeah, I'm a fan. The LotR fanhood cooled down two years ago, and it's been years since I read the book, and that was still all off the top of my head. Baumer didn't call us Loonies for nothing... |
Author: | Ripper [ Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
loyalfromlondon wrote: ROTK extended sucked ass. There, I said it. I bought it, but I haven't been able to make myself watch it. |
Author: | Erendis [ Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
[quote="Ripper" I bought it, but I haven't been able to make myself watch it.[/quote] It's probably not worth it ,especially if you didn't like RotK to begin with. About half the extra scenes are book scenes that no longer fit in (because of how the movie was condensed and edited), and the other half is crap direct from PJ's fat noggin. Might be worth it if you skip around to just the extra scenes. It IS worth it to watch the two Extras disks though. They are top-notch. |
Author: | Anita Hussein Briem [ Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I second that notion. Cynthia, do not watch the extended ROTK movie itself. Just watch the extras. ROTK in my opinion was already the weakest of the three films; the extended scenes dragged it down even more. Both FOTR and TTT were greatly improved by the added scenes. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |