World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
new shrek 3 poster http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=23852 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Excel [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | new shrek 3 poster |
http://www.impawards.com/2007/shrek_the_third.html i love it! |
Author: | Mister Ecks [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Why is it called "Shrek the Third"? Am I missing an inside joke? |
Author: | Anonymous [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
like royalty. |
Author: | Mister Ecks [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
loyalfromlondon wrote: like royalty. That's the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard. Screw Shrek, and the donkey he rode in on. |
Author: | Libs [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Woohoo! I'm so excited. I love the Shrek movies. Both of them. |
Author: | The Dark Shape [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Mr. X wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: like royalty. That's the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard. Screw Shrek, and the donkey he rode in on. Um... okay. |
Author: | Spidey [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I like the poster. |
Author: | Rev [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
YAY! ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Mister Ecks [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The Dark Shape wrote: Mr. X wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: like royalty. That's the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard. Screw Shrek, and the donkey he rode in on. Um... okay. I don't know why I hold such animosity towards the Shrek movies. I actually like 'em. But something bothers me about Shrek 2 grossing $440 mill domestically. I'll tone down the Shrek hate from now on. |
Author: | JURiNG [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
it was okay |
Author: | MovieDude [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
It's alright, if not thoroughly unoriginal. |
Author: | ashwani [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
revolutions wrote: YAY! ![]() ![]() SUCKS big time!!!!! |
Author: | DIB2 [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
ashwani wrote: revolutions wrote: YAY! ![]() ![]() SUCKS big time!!!!! I agree, that poster is shit |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Mr. X wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: Mr. X wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: like royalty. That's the dumbest ####### thing I've ever heard. Screw Shrek, and the donkey he rode in on. Um... okay. I don't know why I hold such animosity towards the Shrek movies. I actually like 'em. But something bothers me about Shrek 2 grossing $440 mill domestically. I'll tone down the Shrek hate from now on. Nah, you don't have to tone anything down.. I think the primary reason why you hold such animosity toward this is because you didn't feel it was as good as the other 95% of the moviegoing audience and your probably somewhat cynical seeing's how you post on a movie website and are probably a little more nitpickier than the average moviegoer who doesn't surf sites like this and are easier to entertain?? |
Author: | matatonio [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:51 am ] |
Post subject: | |
they need to come up with better teasers, its not bad just very unoriginal |
Author: | Dkmuto [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Unoriginal, but I still like it. |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Dkmuto wrote: Unoriginal, but I still like it. Yeah it definitely get's the point across.. Instead of making that a "3" there leaning on, they should've made it a dollar sign$$$$ cause this movie will make the boatload once again.. |
Author: | android [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:05 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So, it's not groundbreaking or anything, but it's still a cool teaser ![]() |
Author: | MadGez [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:31 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I agree with BKB - the films arent masterpieces but they are fun and the majority of people like em - hence the $$$$$ at the BO. |
Author: | Shack [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Looks great to me, keeps in theme with the last couple. ![]() I hoped they would show a new character on it though, like say Timberlake's King Arthur. Probably on the next one. |
Author: | Kris K [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Poster is pretty weak and unoriginal. 'Shrek' was dire. 'Shrek 2' was fabulous! |
Author: | The Dark Shape [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Shrek was quite a bit better than Shrek 2. |
Author: | zingy [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Not bad. I miiiight see it. |
Author: | Groucho [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Are.... are those flying dragon/donkeys in the air? Implying that Donkey and the dragon, you know...? Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww..... |
Author: | The Dark Shape [ Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
They were there at the end of Shrek 2. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |