World of KJ :: View topic - Bewitched Teaser Trailer!!

loyalfromlondon wrote:

Will looks too handsome in those pics.

The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will.

Snrub wrote:

loyalfromlondon wrote:

Will looks too handsome in those pics.

The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will.

Jumping the gun a bit there, ain't ya Loyal? How do you know that audiences prefer odd Will when this is really only his first try at being leading man Will.

Archie Gates wrote:

Bad casting.

Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate.

matatonio wrote:

Archie Gates wrote:

Bad casting.

Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate.

Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old!

Archie Gates wrote:

matatonio wrote:

Archie Gates wrote:

Bad casting.

Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate.

Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old!

Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel.

Libs wrote:

Archie Gates wrote:

matatonio wrote:

Archie Gates wrote:

Bad casting.

Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate.

Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old!

Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel.

I don't know. Nicole Kidman has a wide range.

roidrage wrote:

Jim Carrey would of worked as Darrell, not Will Farrell. Look at the 60s series and see how Jim Carrey resembles Dick York almost to the T.

Zingaling wrote:

Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Libs wrote:

Zingaling wrote:

Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie.

I think we're being a little quick to judge here.

Pinkpanther wrote:

Libs wrote:

Zingaling wrote:

Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie.

I think we're being a little quick to judge here.

I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. :oops:

Archie Gates wrote:

Pinkpanther wrote:

Libs wrote:

Zingaling wrote:

Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie.

I think we're being a little quick to judge here.

So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait?

Libs wrote:

Archie Gates wrote:

Pinkpanther wrote:

Libs wrote:

Zingaling wrote:

Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie.

I think we're being a little quick to judge here.

So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait?

Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet.

Libs wrote:

Archie Gates wrote:

Pinkpanther wrote:

Libs wrote:

Zingaling wrote:

Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie.

I think we're being a little quick to judge here.

So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait?

Author:	matatonio [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Bewitched Teaser Trailer!!
Quicktime Windows Media Player Hi-Res Windows Media Player Lo-Res Real Player Hi-Res Real Player Lo-Res

Author:	Steve [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Oh... Oh no... That is not right, that is not right at all.

Author:	neo_wolf [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:35 pm ]
Post subject:
That looked so awful! And she couldnt move her nose!all she movved was her lips!

Author:	Anonymous [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:
Will looks too handsome in those pics. The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will.

Author:	matatonio [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:
yep looks bad! that nose!!!

World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

Bewitched Teaser Trailer!! http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2103	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Snrub [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:06 pm ]
Post subject:
loyalfromlondon wrote: Will looks too handsome in those pics. The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will. Jumping the gun a bit there, ain't ya Loyal? How do you know that audiences prefer odd Will when this is really only his first try at being leading man Will.

Author:	Anonymous [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:22 pm ]
Post subject:
Snrub wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Will looks too handsome in those pics. The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will. Jumping the gun a bit there, ain't ya Loyal? How do you know that audiences prefer odd Will when this is really only his first try at being leading man Will. Just looking into my crystal ball.

Author:	A. G. [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:25 pm ]
Post subject:
Bad casting. Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate.

Author:	matatonio [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting. Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old!

Author:	Atoddr [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:
Hmm....I thought Kidman had the look down really well. And who knows if Will might actually stay handsome throughout the whole movie?

Author:	A. G. [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:50 pm ]
Post subject:
matatonio wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting. Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old! Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel.

Author:	Libs [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:05 pm ]
Post subject:
Archie Gates wrote: matatonio wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting. Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old! Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel. I don't know. Nicole Kidman has a wide range.

Author:	El Maskado [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:05 pm ]
Post subject:
Jim Carrey would of worked as Darrell, not Will Farrell. Look at the 60s series and see how Jim Carrey resembles Dick York almost to the T.

Author:	matatonio [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:12 pm ]
Post subject:
Jim Carrey is perfect for that role!!!

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	A. G. [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:12 pm ]
Post subject:
Libs wrote: Archie Gates wrote: matatonio wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting. Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old! Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel. I don't know. Nicole Kidman has a wide range. Oh I'm sure she's technically capable of it, I'm just questioning whether the public will like it. But then I thought Kate Winslet would have been better in Bridget Jones than Renee Z. so what do I know.

Author:	Libs [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:
roidrage wrote: Jim Carrey would of worked as Darrell, not Will Farrell. Look at the 60s series and see how Jim Carrey resembles Dick York almost to the T. I believe Jim Carrey was cast alongside Kidman when the movie was first announced, but he had to drop out and be replaced by Will Ferrell.

Author:	zingy [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:
Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.

Author:	Libs [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:01 pm ]
Post subject:
Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here.

Author:	Jmart [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:
Eh, I wasn't a big fan of the trailer, but it doesn't look too awful.

Author:	xXVincentxX [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:17 pm ]
Post subject:
Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too.

Author:	A. G. [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait?

Author:	Libs [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:
Archie Gates wrote: Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait? Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet.

Author:	lovemerox [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:
Libs wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait? Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet. I concur

Author:	matatonio [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:20 pm ]
Post subject:
well my only problem with the teaser is Nicole!! she cant move the nose the right way!! eck she doesnt even move the nose, just the mouth!!

Author:	STEVE ROGERS [ Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:35 pm ]
Post subject:
Libs wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait? Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet. Christ Sweetheart.. Welcome to the Internet World.. You should know by now for as long as you've posted in forums like this that people are like that...