|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
XMEN is the most Impressive Superhero Franchise of all Time
Author |
Message |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21900 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
 XMEN is the most Impressive Superhero Franchise of all Time
You guys can say what you want, but dont worry I will give evidence to support my claim.
#1 I'm not talking about Adaptation, after the first film we knew that the Xmen films werent the best, but an interesting take, much like Burton's Batman Returns.
#2 All three films are majoritly well recieved, ranging from good to great. All with Imdb ratings over 7, good yahoo scores and cinema scores of a B or higher.
#3 The franchise, much like Batman and Superman before it, went through an overhaul behind the scenes, and for once, the Franchise stood against all the backlash and became the most exciting and entertaining film of the summer season so far. Quality wise, we know the third has problems, but that does not hurt enough to be considered a horrible film.
#4 Most importantly, Never has the first sequel of a superhero film ever outgrossed the original, where making Xmen the only one. Not even your mighty Spiderman could do it. Whats even more amazing is that The third film will undoubtdly gross more than the 2nd domestically. This puts it in the rare blockbuster franchises such as Lord of the Rings.
#5 Although this is not confirmed yet, the third film in the series has highest opening Friday, quite possibly the highest 3day weekend, and the Highest opening for Memorial Day Weekend. So finally people can stop saying the overrated Spiderman is the best because it has the highest Opening Weekend.
#6 Not only is their a hint at another sequel that people cheered at the end, but there are even spinoff films in the works. Meaning that although the series could sustain more sequels in the future. Meaning that the Franchise has the best possibility to go pass 4 films. Joining Juggernauts such as Rocky, Star Wars, and James Bond. (Batman does not count due to the restart)
Let the flaming begin, but no other Superhero Franchise has more points for it. If you think otherwise please give reasoning.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat May 27, 2006 5:39 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Yeah, it is.......... well until Spider-Man 3 comes out.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sat May 27, 2006 5:45 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21900 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Killuminati510 wrote: Yeah, it is.......... well until Spider-Man 3 comes out.
We'll see in a year wont me, but it still wont increase 30 million over the lasts opening weekend like all of the Xmen films did, and box office wise, Spidey is very likely to fall short again, with the loss of higher weekdays, more frontloadedness from it being more of a fanboy film. Though I really hope Spidey 3 is great, everything about it is good so far, except the loss of Danny elfman, because the 2nd was such a dissappointment to me.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat May 27, 2006 5:48 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40599
|
Spider-Man.
It has just as much raves from critics and the audience, more actually. Say what you want about X3, but the critical response has been much more lackluster for it, and most people seem to agree that quality-wise it's a big step down. It's still entertaining as hell, but as much quality this time.
Both SM films far outgrossed any of the X-Men ones, those two are in the top 10 of all time and no X-Men flick is in the top 30 yet(X3 will make it though).
Spider-Man 3 will shatter all those records when it comes out anyways.
...
Either way though, the X-Men series is still a fantastic achievement.  It's a solid 2nd place.
_________________Shackâs top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
Last edited by Shack on Sat May 27, 2006 5:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
Sat May 27, 2006 5:49 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21900 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Thegun wrote: Killuminati510 wrote: Yeah, it is.......... well until Spider-Man 3 comes out. We'll see in a year wont we, but it still wont increase 30 million over the lasts opening weekend like all of the Xmen films did, and box office wise, Spidey is very likely to fall short again, with the loss of higher weekdays, more frontloadedness from it being more of a fanboy film. Though I really hope Spidey 3 is great, everything about it is good so far, except the loss of Danny elfman, because the 2nd was such a dissappointment to me.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat May 27, 2006 5:49 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Well usually when a movies total reaches 400m+ theres nowhere else to go except down for the next movie. Making 370m is more impressive then making 215m no matter increase or decrease. Now X3 will make 250m+, thats great, but the next Spidey film will make another 370m+. Whats the more impressive franchise? One that hits 350m+ for all three movies or one that gets anywhere from 150m-250m?
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sat May 27, 2006 5:53 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21900 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Shack wrote: Spider-Man. It has just as much raves from critics and the audience, more actually. Say what you want about X3, but the critical response has been much more lackluster for it, and most people seem to agree that quality-wise it's a big step down. It's still entertaining as hell, but as much quality this time. Both SM films far outgrossed any of the X-Men ones, those two are in the top 10 of all time and no X-Men flick is in the top 30 yet(X3 will make it though). Spider-Man 3 will shatter all those records when it comes out anyways. ... Either way though, the X-Men series is still a fantastic achievement.  It's a solid 2nd place.
My only problem with your post is that your using a consensus movie board that was against the movie since the start. Yet the movie still has more As then any other grade in the forum. Although Critical Response is one to look at they are also close on Rotten Tomatoes, the 3rd Spiderman not withstanding.
Its much better to check IMDB, since all have over 50,000 votes.
Xmen and Spiderman both have a 7.3
Spidey 2 has a 7.8 and X2 has a 7.9
X3 has a 7.5 right now.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat May 27, 2006 6:00 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Unless Spider-Man III sucks, it will end up as my favorite.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat May 27, 2006 6:24 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11035
|
If Spidey 3 ends up as good as part 2 then it will be the best superhero trilogy.Also, the x-men films have not done anywhere near as much $$$ as the spidey films, and spiderman is the only superhero films to date that is a huge success internationally.
|
Sat May 27, 2006 6:55 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Unless Spider-Man III sucks, it will end up as my favorite.
And since it will not suck, it will be your favourite!
We finally agree on something!
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sat May 27, 2006 6:58 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21900 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Money, I agree there Spiderman is untouchable, but even so, I still have no doubt that Spidey 3 will also decrease over the 2nd. Quality, is really a matter of opinion, depends on the viewer. I found Spidey 2 to be almost as unbearable as Batman and Robin. The funny thing is that I liked it the first time I saw it, but its one of the worst films to rewatch, there is no action at all. The story is cheesy as hell the villains are no where near as interesting as other superhero films. And the more I look at it, His grandmother is one of the worst characters ever portrayed. The only thing they really did well in my opinion was Tobey. Probably the best casting since Reeves as Superman. He makes the films fun to watch.
I hope Spidey 3 is great though.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sat May 27, 2006 7:18 pm |
|
 |
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm Posts: 5554 Location: Long Island
|
I haven't been impressed with either of the first two X-Men movies and I'm sure the third one won't knock me off my feet either.
|
Sat May 27, 2006 7:28 pm |
|
 |
jb007
Veteran
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm Posts: 3917 Location: Las Vegas
|
The first two X-men movies are very good and infinitely better than the deathly boring/coma inducing Spiderman movies. The third is a disappointment IMHO. But most others seem to like the third one also. Further, the two sequels have gotten bigger than their predecessors indicating good audience growth.
I would have to agree that the X-Men franchise is the leader at this point. Though X3 is disappointing, it is no Batman Forever/&Robin/Superman III/IV. The new Batman series could be the best if the quality of BB continues with the next one.
_________________ Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006 The Greatest Actor Ever. Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.
|
Sat May 27, 2006 7:46 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
No.
Batman is.
Despite the crappyness of the last one, when it works, it REALLY works.
Batman - A
Batman Returns - A-
Batman Forever - B
Batman & Robin - C
Batman Begins - A
|
Sat May 27, 2006 10:32 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
Excuse me people.
Are we forgetting the classic Daredevil and the even better Elektra?
I think so. Keep forgetting. KEEP FORGETTING.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sat May 27, 2006 10:52 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
Thegun wrote: Killuminati510 wrote: Yeah, it is.......... well until Spider-Man 3 comes out. We'll see in a year wont me, but it still wont increase 30 million over the lasts opening weekend like all of the Xmen films did, and box office wise, Spidey is very likely to fall short again, with the loss of higher weekdays, more frontloadedness from it being more of a fanboy film. Though I really hope Spidey 3 is great, everything about it is good so far, except the loss of Danny elfman, because the 2nd was such a dissappointment to me.
You can't necessarily say that since we haven't seen even a teaser for SPIDERMAN III.. As fans, we've been extremely lucky to have Sam Raimi still Directing the SPIDERMAN movie's and hasn't turned into a flamewar over another Director taking over like X-MEN caused, that is until the 4th SPIDERMAN film is released and whther Raimi will be involved with that or not...
|
Sat May 27, 2006 11:35 pm |
|
 |
kypade
Kypade
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm Posts: 7908
|
Spider-Man 1+2 = what, 200 mil OW?
X-Men 1, 2 AND 3 = what? 230?
How is that more impressive?
If you're trying to use box office as points for X-Men, you lose sixteen ways and a day.
And quality/general/critical reception, well, I dunno how you can say X-men is ahead in those games, either.
So, yeahkay, Spidey >>>> the World.
|
Sat May 27, 2006 11:42 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Spiderman 2 was the greatest comic book movie of all time.
The rest get lost in the shuffle... but X-Men, Batman, and Superman are the only others who stand out. And of those here's how they rank:
2. Batman Begins
3. X-Men: United
4. Spiderman
5. Superman 2
6. Batman
7. Batman Returns
8. X-Men
9. Superman
10. Batman Forever
11. Batman and Robin
Disagree... if you DARE
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun May 28, 2006 1:46 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
It's my personal favorite (Spidey 2 was boring) but that's because the source material is more creative than the others. Spider-Man shares many plot points with Superman so it can hardly be called original while Batman has had too many bad installments to even be considered (Akiva Goldsman and Joel Schumacher are to blame).
|
Sun May 28, 2006 2:15 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21900 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Joe wrote: It's my personal favorite (Spidey 2 was boring) but that's because the source material is more creative than the others. Spider-Man shares many plot points with Superman so it can hardly be called original while Batman has had too many bad installments to even be considered (Akiva Goldsman and Joel Schumacher are to blame).
Thank you, so many people forget how much Spiderman has taken from other superhero films and just improved on. None of it is very original. The only thing that is, is the teenage love story that accounts for the higher grosses. Other than that, Spiderman is a well made rehash of better comic book movies. I dont even know what Raimi was thinking with the 2nd film, he is such a great director, but Spidey 2 is definitely his worst movie, theres three action scenes in its 2 1/2 hour long running time filled with a lot of comedy and drama that was mostly the same from the first film. Mary Jane running at the end was definitely the worst scene of the year. I think Spidey 3 will be great, because it looks as though the franchise will finally take a chance and do something interesting and edgy. Xmen definitely had the most interesting storyline and the most hidden themes of any superhero series. though the third didnt capture it to its best potential, it was still quite engaging.
And please stop using grosses. Since when do high grosses mean its the best. Both Series are big successes. Xmen cost 75 million where as Spiderman cost 125, the 2nd Xmen cost 110, where as the 2nd Spiderman was 200 million.
I said as far as money goes, Spiderman is easily on top, but that is only 1 out of about 10 factors that it has.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sun May 28, 2006 1:57 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Thegun and 58 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|