World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=34054 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | xiayun [ Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
From Variety: Quote: The MPAA has given Ang Lee's Toronto-bound "Lust, Caution" an NC-17 rating and Focus Features has accepted it. The erotic espionage thriller, co-written by Focus CEO James Schamus and Wang Hui Ling, will bow in Gotham on Sept. 28, as skedded, and expand to additional markets Oct. 5. Based on Eileen Change's short story about a shy Chinese drama student drawn into an assassination plot against a Japanese collaborator during WWII, the Chinese-language pic stars Tony Leung and newcomer Tang Wei. Schamus said the specialty label accepts the rating without protest. "As with so many of his previous films, Oscar-winning director Ang Lee has crafted a masterpiece about and for grown-ups, Schamus said. The rating likely did not come as a surprise to Focus. In the pic's production notes, Schamus likened the lead femme character to Maria Schneider's role in "Last Tango in Paris," another sexually explicit pic that received an X rating for its 1973 release and was subsequently rated NC-17 for a homevideo reissue. The MPAA created the NC-17 rating in 1990 in an attempt to remove the stigma surrounding the X rating. However, studios often fight the designation due to a due to newspaper advertising restrictions against NC 17 fare. So basically a more sexually charged Black Book. I'm definitely there, if I weren't already before. I didn't expect big box office to begin with, but this pretty much puts its ceiling at $10m considering Bad Education got $5.2m. Still, more excited. ![]() |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Wonderful!! It will not be a blockbuster but I think it could start a change. Whatever happens it is one of my most anticipated this year and this just makes it better. |
Author: | snack [ Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
I fucking hate the MPAA, but they hated this...so it must be good! |
Author: | xiayun [ Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Explanation for the ruling: Quote: The MPAA ratings board cited the film's graphic sexuality for its decision. A source said too many of the film's sex scenes violated the ratings board's unwritten rules (like the number of allowable pelvic thrusts, for example) to make an appeal possible. Sources who have seen the film said it contains at least three scenes -- one a long montage -- featuring multiple acts of aggressive sexual activity in different positions. There's no full-frontal male nudity (the source of some NC-17 rulings when shown in sex scenes), but male-on-female oral sex, non-S&M restraints and several nontraditional sexual positions are depicted, conveying the aggression and emotional conflict between the main characters. When asked if anyone was shown, say, upside down, one viewer said, "It depends on where you're standing. They're very flexible." Sounds very interesting. |
Author: | Shack [ Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
I'm still pissed at the MPAA for giving Where the Truth Lies an NC-17 for 5 seconds of a non-nude gay sex gesture. Talk about homophobic double standards. |
Author: | Alex Y. [ Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
my interest in this movie just quadrupled. |
Author: | Chris [ Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Sounds great. This has jumped a lot on my most-anticipated list. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Hmm, with Lee's name on it, I still see it doing $8 million at least... |
Author: | Raffiki [ Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Just watched This Film is Not Yet Rated, lol. I'm really interested in seeing this now (as if I wasn't before ![]() |
Author: | Christian [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Wooohoooo fuck yeah no kids in the theatre!!!!1 Better luck next time Raffi |
Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Let's hope for the best - - Ang Lee is nothing if not inconsistent... ![]() |
Author: | bABA [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
i just love the idea of a film rating changing over the number of pelvic thrusts. its priceless. |
Author: | trixster [ Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
bABA wrote: i just love the idea of a film rating changing over the number of pelvic thrusts. its priceless. Watch This Film is Not Yet Rated. It mocks it hilariously. |
Author: | Jonathan [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
Official rating reasoning: "some explicit sexuality." That's kinda pathetic-sounding. ![]() |
Author: | MovieDude [ Wed May 06, 2009 4:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
That NC-17 sure made me think this would be a lot more titillating than the end result. Zzz |
Author: | MovieDude [ Wed May 06, 2009 4:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
That NC-17 sure made me think this would be a lot more titillating than the end result. ![]() |
Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Wed May 06, 2009 7:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Lust, Caution Nabs NC-17 Rating |
MovieDude wrote: That NC-17 sure made me think this would be a lot more titillating than the end result. ![]() I hope you'll still find the time to write us a review, Dude... ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |