At least Leo's Oscar winning broke a twitter record
| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=79734 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Jmart [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
2008 Oscars (lowest rated) - No Country For Old Men was the winner, Jon Stewart hosted. 32 million viewers 1998 Oscars (highest rated) - Titanic was the winner, Billy Crystal hosted. 57 million viewers 2015 Oscars - Birdman was the winner, Neil Patrick Harris hosted. 37 million viewers Where will 2016 land? |
|
| Author: | nghtvsn [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Chris is killing it so far for me |
|
| Author: | nghtvsn [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Um . Charlize. Not charice unless that's her "black" name |
|
| Author: | nghtvsn [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Screenplay is ultra early or am I crazy ? |
|
| Author: | Biggestgeekever [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
I'm sensing this will be a pretty huge year, between The Revenant/Leo, Oscar Controversy, and Chris Rock hosting. Think it'll be the biggest since 1998. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
But all the blacks will "boycott", so expect a record year of 60m viewers. |
|
| Author: | MadGez [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 10:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Yeah should get string ratings. I'll go with 47m. |
|
| Author: | Brian [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
40m |
|
| Author: | Brian [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Ouch! |
|
| Author: | BJ [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 2:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Magnus wrote: Early numbers indicate a eight year low good |
|
| Author: | Biggestgeekever [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Magnus wrote: Early numbers indicate a eight year low Disney must now be extremely pissed Star Wars wasn't nominated for BP. |
|
| Author: | MikeQ. [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
34 million viewers - that's close to the lowest ever. Not good. Peace, Mike |
|
| Author: | MadGez [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Terrible. |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
I guess Black lives DO matter! |
|
| Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Weird, I thought the allure of Leo would bring in the viewings, but I think the Oscars So White campaign worked. |
|
| Author: | Brian [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
At least Leo's Oscar winning broke a twitter record
|
|
| Author: | Rev [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
That's what you get Hollywood for NOT nominating Star Wars for best picture
|
|
| Author: | BJ [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Rev wrote: That's what you get Hollywood for NOT nominating Star Wars for best picturetruth |
|
| Author: | O [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
2016 Grammy's got 25 m viewers while they were at 28.5 m two years ago. The Golden Globes got 18.5 m this year. At 34 m considering these Oscars got the most publicity of any potentially ever, there's the chance that the 34 m was inflated even more than what it could have done without the publicity. The Oscars better re-tool because they very well could get below 30 m one of these years at this rate. |
|
| Author: | zwackerm [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Weird considering there were 3 mega hits this year, and only one last year. |
|
| Author: | Rev [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
The Oscars used to be cool/must see tv. Now it's just another award show. Kinda sad |
|
| Author: | zwackerm [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Rev wrote: The Oscars used to be cool/must see tv. Now it's just another award show. Kinda sad Yes, it's not like there have been other awards shows in the past.  The only explanation is the #OscarsSoWhite boycott worked. This year's Best picture nominees sold over 12 million more tickets than last year's, no other reason for less interest. |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
I think this is attributable in large part to the lack of AA interest. Viewership was much higher two years ago (when 12YAS won). |
|
| Author: | i.hope [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
Finally people found more interesting things to do. |
|
| Author: | Jack Sparrow [ Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Oscars Viewership (2016 Edition) |
It isn't a big surprise that these were least viewed. Blacks are a HUGE part of the community. Next year we will see an uptick with some non-deserving high profile Black actor/actress wins. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|