World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Sylvester Stallone?!?!? http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=26082 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Sylvester Stallone?!?!? |
Best actor Oscar, again? Not out of the realm of possibility... |
Author: | Harry Warden [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:07 am ] |
Post subject: | |
He was good but it's not going to happen again. |
Author: | android [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
It would be fun to see him once again as a nominee though (he was brilliant in Copland - I think he deserved another one right there). But the big victory for Stallone is to avoid the Razzie nom. ![]() |
Author: | baumer72 [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The academy would never admit that he deserves one. Acting wise he is good enough to garner one but screenplay wise, he should be nominated. I know he won't, but the script is fantastic. |
Author: | David [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
No. Box office success is his prize. The Academy won't honor Rocky Balboa. Zero nominations. |
Author: | MovieDude [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Daniel Craig will get a nomination before Stallone does. |
Author: | Webslinger [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Not a chance. |
Author: | thompsoncory [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Absolutely not. |
Author: | Jonathan [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sylvester Stallone?!?!? |
bradley witherberry wrote: Best actor Oscar, again? Not out of the realm of possibility... Actually, it is. |
Author: | Joker's Thug #3 [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Theres about 20 names that would take the 5th spot before him. |
Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sylvester Stallone?!?!? |
Awards Czar Jon wrote: bradley witherberry wrote: Best actor Oscar, again? Not out of the realm of possibility... Actually, it is. I'm surprised you'd compromise your street cred like that, Jon. I know it's a long shot, especially taking into account "Oscar politics", but have you seen the movie? The audience I was in went nuts for the character as portrayed by Stallone - he does a great acting job in this movie. I say again -- ia nomination is a possibility (albeit a slim one)... |
Author: | O [ Sun Dec 24, 2006 2:42 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I think, and as has been mentioed in countless reviews, Rocky Balboa's Oscar glory will more than anything be to reiterate that Rocky 1 did deserve to win best picture. Rocky was becoming a joke with #5 and this long delay for the next one, but I think the franchise redeeming itself, and adding a shine to the 1976 winner is probably more important than him getting one now. But you never know, people LOVE comeback stories. If Rocky were in Miramax's hands, I don't doubt that it could have been a bigger contender. But MGM hasn't had a best picture nomination (and a win) in 19 years, with the last one being Rain Man. They also had 1987, 1980, and 1979 best picture nods. So they just weren't in the position to really even push for it... |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |