Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO.
| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Just saw an FYC ad for Best Director - McG! http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=25678 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Harry Warden [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Just saw an FYC ad for Best Director - McG! |
What? Warner actually thinks the director of Charlie's Angels has any chance of a nomination? The day he gets a nom he will be competing against Brett Ratner and Michael Bay. |
|
| Author: | Riggs [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO.
|
|
| Author: | Harry Warden [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Riggs27 wrote: Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO. The Island was very good but other than that, I don't know. Pearl Harbor was decent but very obviously influenced by Titanic. |
|
| Author: | MadGez [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Joe wrote: Riggs27 wrote: Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO. The Island was very good but other than that, I don't know. Pearl Harbor was decent but very obviously influenced by Titanic. Yes The Island was very good. The Rock was good too. |
|
| Author: | Harry Warden [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
MadGez wrote: Joe wrote: Riggs27 wrote: Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO. The Island was very good but other than that, I don't know. Pearl Harbor was decent but very obviously influenced by Titanic. Yes The Island was very good. The Rock was good too. Haven't seen The Rock. |
|
| Author: | MadGez [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Its a good action film. Over the top but not totally mindless. Give it a go - you may be pleasantly surprised. I'd still rank The Island as the better film but The Rock is enjoyable. And Connery certainly doesnt hurt it either. As for McG - stranger things have happened. Even though I want to see Marshall, I serously doubt it will be up for any major awards. |
|
| Author: | MovieDude [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 5:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Michael Bay should have won Best Director for Bad Boys II. When they called his name up he'd have rode through the audience in an H2 Hummer before blowing up the stage. |
|
| Author: | neo_wolf [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Riggs27 wrote: Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO. Nice joke. |
|
| Author: | Riggs [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
MadGez wrote: Joe wrote: Riggs27 wrote: Well, Michael Bay already deserved some nominations, IMO. The Island was very good but other than that, I don't know. Pearl Harbor was decent but very obviously influenced by Titanic. Yes The Island was very good. The Rock was good too. Armageddon too. Bad Boys II too. 
|
|
| Author: | Tyler [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 11:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fuck Bay/Bruckheimer. They are pretentious as, say, Anthony Minghella, but wouldn't admit it. Why make a "dumb action movie" 2.5 hours long? |
|
| Author: | Jonathan [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
MovieDude wrote: Michael Bay should have won Best Director for Bad Boys II. When they called his name up he'd have rode through the audience in an H2 Hummer before blowing up the stage. Best Oscar moment ever? |
|
| Author: | Levy [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ah, this is where all the loonies went. I was wondering already... 
|
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Whoa whoa whoa. McG directed We Are Marshall? Uggh |
|
| Author: | Shack [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wait, who the fuck is McG? |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
director charlies anegls 1 n 2 n was this close to directig superman before singer. n ya he did marshall |
|
| Author: | David [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm sure, at this point, it's just political courtesy. I highly doubt WB expects a sappy football drama (or it's three-letter-name director) to be an award heavyweight. |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Shack wrote: Wait, who the fuck is McG? DirectorofthetwoCharlie'sAngels.ExecproducerforTheO.C. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|