World of KJ :: View topic - What a weird year this is!

dolcevita wrote:

Two of the three highest grossing imports were not nominated in any way shape or form (Downfall, contrary to everyone's opinion, doesn't count, as it was actually nominated last year).

North Country, 'nuff said.

2 of the five BP noms are shot in Black and White (to some extent), as well.

Dr. Lecter wrote:

- A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations

Dr. Lecter wrote:

Two? Which is the other one? (other than GNGL)

Groucho wrote:

Dr. Lecter wrote:

- A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations

Which one?

Dr. Lecter wrote:

- There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years

Chris wrote:

Dr. Lecter wrote:

- There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years

Actually, unless I missed something, I think you have to go back to 1948 for that.

Killuminati510 wrote:

You know if Geisha ended up being a better movie it could've easily won best picture this year, I mean it would've atleast been a favor. It had the technical awards under it's belt, it just needed to be a stronger movie and it could've happened.

alex young wrote:

Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend?

xiayun wrote:

alex young wrote:

Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend?

I believe so.

ManicForMunich wrote:

Is it too early to call this year's BP nominees an embarassment.

Author:	Dr. Lecter [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:32 pm ]
Post subject:	What a weird year this is!
I was re-reading the Oscar noms recently again and realized whaz a truly unusual year this is. I am not just speaking about the singular unusual things, but the fact that all of them happened in the same year. These are the odd things I have noticed about this year's Oscars: - No Best Visual Effects nomination for Star Wars - the very first Star Wars flick not to get one. Yet, it got a make-up nom. - Only three Best Song nominees for the first time in over a decade - There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years - The movie with the highest number of nominations received only 8 noms - The Best Picture frontrunner received no Best Editing nomination for the first time in 25 years - Only two Best Picture nominees received Editing noms - The Best Director and Best Picture nominations matched 5/5 for the first time in 25 years - Only two of the Best Picture nominees were nominated for Best Picture at the Golden Globes - Only three of the Best Director nominees were nominated for Best Director at the Golden Globes - A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations - 14 of the acting nominees are first-time nominees - The Academy went for quality and not huge commercial success in the Best Animated Picture categry, by nominating Howl's Moving Castle - By the time of the nominees announcement not a single Best Picture nominee made $60+ million Feel free to add your odd trivia

Author:	dolcevita [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:
Two of the three highest grossing imports were not nominated in any way shape or form (Downfall, contrary to everyone's opinion, doesn't count, as it was actually nominated last year). North Country, 'nuff said. 2 of the five BP noms are shot in Black and White (to some extent), as well.

Author:	Dr. Lecter [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:37 pm ]
Post subject:
dolcevita wrote: Two of the three highest grossing imports were not nominated in any way shape or form (Downfall, contrary to everyone's opinion, doesn't count, as it was actually nominated last year). North Country, 'nuff said. 2 of the five BP noms are shot in Black and White (to some extent), as well. Two? Which is the other one? (other than GNGL)

Author:	Groucho [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: What a weird year this is!
Dr. Lecter wrote: - A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations Which one?

Author:	dolcevita [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:
Dr. Lecter wrote: Two? Which is the other one? (other than GNGL) Capote is shot half in Black and White, and the other half in "cold" color schema. They're woven together. Groucho wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: - A movie with less than 35% at RT received six Oscar nominations Which one? Geisha

World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

What a weird year this is! http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=16576	Page 1 of 1

Author:	andaroo1 [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:36 pm ]
Post subject:
All 5 nominees are nominated for Screenplay. I can't remember the last time that happened. Oh I found it... 2000.

Author:	kypade [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:28 pm ]
Post subject:
apparently the 5dir/5pic/5screenplay line up has only happened once or twice or something, though. (I read that somewhere)

Author:	Chris [ Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: What a weird year this is!
Dr. Lecter wrote: - There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years Actually, unless I missed something, I think you have to go back to 1948 for that.

Author:	Dr. Lecter [ Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: What a weird year this is!
Chris wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: - There is only one single movie with over six nominations for the first time in over 25 (or more?) years Actually, unless I missed something, I think you have to go back to 1948 for that. Wow...

Author:	Christian [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:06 am ]
Post subject:
Wait... The Best Actress category has 3 nominees from the Comedy/Musical Actress Globe category. Is this like a rare occurence?

Author:	Joker's Thug #3 [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:20 am ]
Post subject:
You know if Geisha ended up being a better movie it could've easily won best picture this year, I mean it would've atleast been a favor. It had the technical awards under it's belt, it just needed to be a stronger movie and it could've happened.

Author:	The Scottie [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:08 am ]
Post subject:
You find this interesting (but sad), that in the first time in BO tracking history, every single Best Picture nominee dropped in the per screen averages from the previous weekend in their first post-nod weekend. How sad it that?

Author:	Alex Y. [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:17 am ]
Post subject:
Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend?

Author:	Shack [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Killuminati510 wrote: You know if Geisha ended up being a better movie it could've easily won best picture this year, I mean it would've atleast been a favor. It had the technical awards under it's belt, it just needed to be a stronger movie and it could've happened. I think same goes for All The King's Men if it had stuck around in 2005, I think it would've been a great help to this years weak race.

Author:	Anonymous [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:
Feb 1st Superbowl Jan 27th Nominations (also my 27th birthday, the day ROTK kicked nomination arse)

Author:	Shack [ Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:59 pm ]
Post subject:
Here's another probable one: Not a single BP nominee will pass 100 million dollars box-office, for the first time since 1985.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	xiayun [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:
alex young wrote: Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend? I believe so.

Author:	Dr. Lecter [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:44 pm ]
Post subject:
xiayun wrote: alex young wrote: Was this the first time post-nomination weekend coincided with Super Bowl weekend? I believe so. Didn't it happen in 2004 already? I think that's the reason Mystic River increased 30% on that weekend, no?

Author:	Anonymous [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:
Is it too early to call this year's BP nominees an embarassment.

Author:	Ripper [ Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:37 pm ]
Post subject:
ManicForMunich wrote: Is it too early to call this year's BP nominees an embarassment. There is only one embarrassment on the list. The Oscars have often nominated mediocre/decent films, see Chocolat, but this is the first year where I look to one of the nominees and shake my head. Munich kicks ass, so at the end of the day 1/5 ain't bad...