Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 5:09 pm



Reply to topic  [ 1140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 46  Next
 Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread 
Author Message
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Jeffrey Wells said this today

Quote:
There's a new "uh-oh" in the Los Angeles wind currents about Gus Van Sant's Milk. Acquaintances, whisperers and friends-of friends (some of them having spoken to certain parties within the trades) are saying reactions have been "mixed." I've been asking around but no details or fill-ins. I won't see it until the end of the month.


http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/10/what_4.php

I don't trust Wells much, but it's still not the best sign... he's been on this film's side up to this point so he wouldn't be saying this just to be a jerk. If nothing else this means full reactions are only around the corner.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:36 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Honestly, that doesn't surprise me all that much. But what would the nominees look like without Milk at this rate?

TDK
Benjamin Button
WALL-E
The Wrestler
Slumdog Millionaire

That'd be a hell of an eclectic set, but could it happen?

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:42 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
I'm waiting for anything on Gran Torino right now... imdb has it listed as action/drama, and I'd think that if Clint was truly going for Oscar again, he'd come up with a better cast than the tv actor nobodies he has. But he is Clint.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:03 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
I'm not saying anything about GT until I see some footage.

After some deliberation:

TDK
Benjamin Button
WALL-E
The Wrestler
Australia

They always throw in something portentous like Australia. Luhrmann hasn't done a boner yet. Wall-E takes the comedy slot as the indies cancel each other out.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Last edited by Tyler on Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:31 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
It's somewhat noteable that Weinstein seems to be intent on releasing Shanghai this year... dunno, if he moved the Road and Cheri because they weren't going anywhere Oscar-wise, it might be a good sign that he's stayed with this one right where it is as a December limited. The Reader and it are the only Oscar-ish films he has left on the schedule. But then again, maybe it just hasn't been seen at all. And the Weinstein co. has not been as dominant as Miramax in their prime. I still think it's the biggest sleeper right now though, considering the weakness of the year. Good cast, nominatable plot, and the early pictures show competence in terms of pretty cinematography and costume design.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:32 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Possible. Any good footage on it? Or Valkyrie?

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:34 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/happygolucky

With 27 reviews in, it stands at 84/100 and has 5 100s. That's a better score than Juno and Rachel Getting Married (though so far the latter has more 100s, it still might change, though).

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:39 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Box office is the big stumbling block for that, Rachel Getting Married and Slumdog. I see Slumdog going the furthest by far, and the Wrestler could break out quite a bit too.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:46 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
RGM's biggest hurdle is the BFCA score (71-ish). BFCA is made up of more of the lesser tier entertainment voters, tieing in pretty perfectly with the AMPA voting block, thus it's usually the best indicator we have. That also makes sense considering pretty much ALL of its negative reviews on RT are from the non-professional, lesser tier critics... it's a critics movie, not an AMPAs one. In comparison LMS had 94, Juno 93, the lowest of the BP nominees last year was 87, year before nothing below 90 got in. It has no chance, unfortunately.

Happy-Go-Lucky's score is 85, btw. Makes sense with where I have it, as a film that has enough pull to get Actress, Screenplay, maybe Supporting Actor noms, but it won't make the BP splash Juno and LMS did.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:14 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Shack wrote:
RGM's biggest hurdle is the BFCA score (71-ish). BFCA is made up of more of the lesser tier entertainment voters, tieing in pretty perfectly with the AMPA voting block, thus it's usually the best indicator we have. That also makes sense considering pretty much ALL of its negative reviews on RT are from the non-professional, lesser tier critics... it's a critics movie, not an AMPAs one. In comparison LMS had 94, Juno 93, the lowest of the BP nominees last year was 87, year before nothing below 90 got in. It has no chance, unfortunately.

Happy-Go-Lucky's score is 85, btw. Makes sense with where I have it, as a film that has enough pull to get Actress, Screenplay, maybe Supporting Actor noms, but it won't make the BP splash Juno and LMS did.


Yeah, the $18,000 PTA is pretty okay-ish. Maybe a lone director nom for one of them.

Where are the BFCA scores found anyway? I know TDK had something ridiculous like a 96, but I want to find more, and Wall-E's, too.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:36 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Just http://www.bfca.org/

Wall-E's doesn't say too much considering Rat had 91 and even Cars 89, but it's enough regardless. TDK is the highest I can find other than American Beauty (99) and Chicago (98). ROTK had 95.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:47 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 9966
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
1. The Dark Knight
2. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
3. Australia
4. The Reader or Revolutionary Road
5. Gran Torino or Slumdog Millionaire

I still don't know what to make of Milk as a contender.

_________________
Top Movies of 2009
1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man

Top Anticipated 2009
1. Nine


Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:12 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Shack wrote:
Just http://www.bfca.org/

Wall-E's doesn't say too much considering Rat had 91 and even Cars 89, but it's enough regardless. TDK is the highest I can find other than American Beauty (99) and Chicago (98). ROTK had 95.


Jesus! TDK's locked.

WALL-E is alright there. It just needs some backing at the end of the year.

I made purdy new predictions in the Ballot thread assuming there aren't any real surprises heading our way and Milk is out of BP.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:29 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
The Dark Knight wrote:
Tapley suggests that Australia may too be delayed until 2009

http://www.incontention.com/?p=2444#more-2444

This is getting ridiculous.


Surely not! Its been heavily marketed here for November, cant seeing them change that atleast.
May mean it has quality issues and not good enough for oscar?

At this rate The Dark Knight will be a shoo-in for many noms and some wins too. Unless offcourse Benjamin Button is as good as we hope it will be!

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:24 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Meh. At this rate they could have an Oscars based off of only movies that missed nominations last year and have a much (much much) better slate. (i.e. Rat, Diving Bell, Savages, Zodiac, Away From Her for BP, Persepolis & 4 Months in Foreign, etc.)


Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:32 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
MadGez wrote:
The Dark Knight wrote:
Tapley suggests that Australia may too be delayed until 2009

http://www.incontention.com/?p=2444#more-2444

This is getting ridiculous.


Surely not! Its been heavily marketed here for November, cant seeing them change that atleast.
May mean it has quality issues and not good enough for oscar?

At this rate The Dark Knight will be a shoo-in for many noms and some wins too. Unless offcourse Benjamin Button is as good as we hope it will be!


I think they'll co-exist very nicely.

Updates...

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:47 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Since seeing the Australia trailer I've been somewhere between 95 and 100% sure it would be a mess... this is no surprise to me :thumbsup: I have no idea how the reaction here to that trailer was so favorable, I think its failure was as written on the wall as with Rendition and Lions for Lambs last year. I'd say the same thing about Revolutionary Road.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:04 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Think we should start considering Cadillac Records as a darkhorse, in this weak year

http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/10/20 ... ie-stills/

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:10 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
The Dark Knight wrote:
Shack wrote:
Think we should start considering Cadillac Records as a darkhorse, in this weak year

http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/10/20 ... ie-stills/


the obvious answer is that if Dreamgirls couldn't do it, there's no way Cadillac Records can.


:yes:

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:30 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
You could also say that Dreamgirls was pretty crappy and still got close and the most nominations... so if CR is good, yeehaw!

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:34 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Shack wrote:
You could also say that Dreamgirls was pretty crappy and still got close and the most nominations... so if CR is good, yeehaw!


77 MC.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:11 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
The Dark Knight wrote:
Slumdog Millionaire has received an R rating.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/con ... eb616f3487

I would guess that will have an affect on its box office but then again, I'm not sure if it ever appealed to teens and families in the first place.


The Full Monty was rated R, a comedy, became Fox Searchlight's highest-grossing picture for seven years, and got nominated for Best Picture in an extremely competitive year.

I don't think the R will hurt, in other words.


Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:53 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
The Dark Knight wrote:
LMS made $60 Mill.


True that.


Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:49 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40597
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
I'm expecting a reaction decent enough to get the acting noms and maybe sneak in as the 5th nom or the BP without BD chioce, but not raving enough for more.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:04 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Well...the 2008 Contenders Discussion Thread
Contrary to RT, Metacritic likes Changeling:

http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/changeling2008

65/100 and two 100-scores. Crash and Babel had 69/100. I'm not saying that this has any chance at a BP nom, but just pointing out, that it doesn't look as bad as it may seem. A nom or two are still possible.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:56 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 1140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 46  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.