Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:48 am



Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
 Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets 

Rate This Film
A 9%  9%  [ 1 ]
B 36%  36%  [ 4 ]
C 27%  27%  [ 3 ]
D 18%  18%  [ 2 ]
F 9%  9%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 11

 Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets 
Author Message
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
Image

Quote:
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets (French: Valérian et la Cité des mille planètes) is an upcoming English-language French science fiction action film[7] written and directed by Luc Besson and co-produced by Besson and Virginie Besson-Silla. The film is based on the French science fiction comics series Valérian and Laureline, written by Pierre Christin and illustrated by Jean-Claude Mézières. It stars Dane DeHaan as Valerian and Cara Delevingne as Laureline, with Clive Owen, Rihanna, Ethan Hawke, Herbie Hancock, Kris Wu and Rutger Hauer in supporting roles. The film is scheduled for release by STX Entertainment on 21 July 2017 in the United States and on 26 July in France.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:14 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 18870
Location: San Diego
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
I really liked this! It's fun, quirky and visually stunning. It's not without its faults but it's an enjoyable movie that I hope finds an audience.


Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:35 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7172
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
I too really enjoyed it. First the obvious, it looks amazing. I couldn't find anything I would change visually. It also had a much better sense of humor than I was expecting. I laughed out loud several times (and it's intentional humor). The critics mostly say the leads don't have chemistry. This is only partly true, and is misleading. They lack romantic chemistry, and some of that can't be blamed on the actors, but rather the way the romantic storyline is introduced. However, the leads do have pretty good chemistry as co-agents working together, which I didn't expect due to the reviews. The movie feels kind of long only because the romantic storyline makes it drag every time it cuts to a scene of that.

Unfortunately, the movie is probably a bit too PG-13 for younger kids, due the the character design of the Pearls, the "romantic" scenes, and the Rihanna dance. So the WOM from parents might not be great if they take younger kids to it.

Other things I liked... the Converter is super cute, and I thought the opening scene showing the evolution of Alpha was great.

Overall, I thought there was much more to like than dislike about this film. I hope it isn't too big of a financial bomb.

8/10


Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:12 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
Considered only as a feat of imagery and world building, Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets is masterful. The film opens incredibly well with a David Bowie-set montage tracing a line from the first joint Soviet-U.S. space flight in 1975 to the distant-future creation of "Alpha," a sprawling outer-space metropolis home to millions of aliens and humans living in harmony and sharing knowledge. It is a hypnotic start, a joyous rush of science-fiction optimism and outlandish art direction and creature design. The film in general is a pleasure in motion; there are points where I almost wished I could pause to absorb every neon-and-stardust detail in every frame. Director Luc Besson stages several clever set pieces, including a foot chase through a type of virtual-reality bazaar. Unfortunately, this is also a film with a screenplay and a cast. The actors range from bored veterans—Clive Owen is stiff as a military leader so obviously compromised and sinister from the start, it hardly registers as a twist when the curtain is lifted—to gifted, but miscast new talents—Dane DeHaan's anxious, angular presence is a poor fit for a traditional space-opera hero—to the simply not very gifted (apologies, Cara Delevingne). And the script contains Attack of the Clones-level romantic bromides and sleep-inducing doses of exposition and jargon. The film runs nearly two hours and 20 minutes, and one can definitely sense it losing steam in the second half as wondrous new sights and sounds become further and farther between and actual investment in the characters is relied upon.

C+

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:49 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
A ghastly dumpster fire trainwreck of a movie. When Cara Delevingne is giving the best performance in a film you know something is deeply wrong with the final product. Almost none of this movie works. The script is absolutely atrocious and filled with cheesy one-liners and failed attempts at creating some sort of epic plot. The characters are idiotic and their motivations make no sense. The ending is anticlimactic. The special effects are ugly, and the Avatar-lite creatures are insufferable. Dane DeHaan gives what is maybe the year's worst performance so far, but is also incredibly miscast. Him and Delevingne (who is also bad, but at least gives her role some energy and spunk as opposed to DeHaan's one flat line reading after another) have no chemistry and their romance is never believable. Clive Owen sucks as the big villain of the piece, and Ethan Hawke shows up out of nowhere in a pointless cameo. Rihanna is in the movie for five minutes and while her character shows promise at first the second her character name is revealed all credibility goes out the window. I have absolutely no idea what Luc Besson was going for with this movie but it did not work for me. It's so bad. D


Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:42 am
Profile YIM
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
thompsoncory wrote:
When Cara Delevingne is giving the best performance in a film you know something is deeply wrong with the final product.


This doesn't make sense.


Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:02 pm
Profile WWW
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 22677
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
Who ever thought these two actors as leads was a good idea? I couldn't think of a worse pairing for this type of film.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Sun Jul 23, 2017 8:56 pm
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14544
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
I still haven't gotten over how awful this movie was.

"I'd die for you."

Kill me.


Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:39 am
Profile YIM
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13270
Location: Vienna
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
MadGez wrote:
Who ever thought these two actors as leads was a good idea? I couldn't think of a worse pairing for this type of film.


Seriously. Anyone else than these two and the movie would have been so much better.


Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:43 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
It has the visual aura and some good bits but it never gives a breather for good parts an the times we can breathe are the love story bits that just don't connect. I did like Cara here much better than Suicide Squad but DeHaan was just bad from his standards which is where the film fails the most an intriguing titular lead character. Besson does good in terms of generating action and visual spectacle but the things ongoing fail to hold attention.

5/10


Sun Jul 30, 2017 3:36 am
Profile
The Kramer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am
Posts: 23762
Location: Classified
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
The lead actors are getting appropriately shat on, but I still enjoyed this. The world building is on point and its always a visual feast. I could have used more scenes like interrogating the Trunked Trio and less declarations of love (Dehaan's delivery of these lines always made me wonder if he was being sarcastic). Cara is smoking hot as her no-nonsense agent character, so that helps a little with her poor acting. Rihanna tops her in both categories though. I believed her insecurity about Valerian not liking her performance.

So its a fun world to be in for two hours, I just wish we could have spent that time with some more kooky characters instead of a teenage-esque romance.


Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:38 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:38 am
Posts: 2084
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets is simply too good for the provincial masses of this single doomed planet. An explosion of imagination crafted from a trillion pixels of exquisite cgi provide the lived-in universe in which the rip-roaring story takes place. Cara Delevigne and Dane DeHaan provide a satisfyingly smart aleck POV, while maintaining Besson's unapologetically romantic spin on life. It's sad that we live in an age where if the original Star Wars were released for the first time today, it would bomb at the box office and be derided by the mindless mob of internet drones. Valerian is awe-inspiring on first watch and promises to unfold fresh wonders on repeated viewings. *A+*


Wed Aug 02, 2017 4:13 am
Profile
Keeping it Light
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:06 am
Posts: 11201
Location: Bright Falls
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
There's not much new or interesting to this film, it's more fantasy-sci-fi staple which I've seen come around in larger and smaller parts elsewhere. Visually there's plenty to marvel at in the film and it keeps the action going for the most part that it doesn't drag, yet it could be wrapped up a bit quicker at the end. The main issue with the film are the leads, and the way of story telling. I still liked Delevingne to some extent even she lacks range, but DeHaan is much more of a misfire as I find him unconvincing as the cocky playboy (a role Pine for example plays much better in Star Trek). Then the film has this cartoony way of dialogue; smirk here, wink there, sure it's based on a comic, but it feels forced the way it's translated to the screen. There's nice parts for Ethan Hawke and Clive Owen in the film and I wasn't bored, it just felt like quite an unnecessary venture..

C


Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:58 am
Profile
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 8942
Location: Houston, Texas
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
Yeah this wasn't very good at all, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't at least fascinated by the whole thing. I mean I liked the world this movie was set in enough that it pretty much kept my interest throughout, but outside the visuals there really isn't much else to like about it. The action sequences are beyond mundane and Dane DeHaan/ Cara Delevingne are just the worst kind of leads you can have in a movie like this, because they have absolutely no chemistry and their dialogue is awful. I honestly can't even decide who was the worst of the two which is sad, because I've enjoyed DeHaan in other films, but in no way should be be playing a Han Solo type and Delevingne just sucks all together. Both were equally, badly miscast IMO.

If I had any other positives it would be that while Clive Owen and Ethan Hawke are wasted I did feel that their characters brought some kind of energy or personalty to the film, and I actually liked the Rihanna scene, but hated when they turned her into a talking, CGI Jellyfish. Her voice became so fucking irritating all of a sudden that it was jarring.

C


Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:18 am
Profile
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21150
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
I really enjoyed it. It's fantastic eye candy. And despite being miscast by 5 (DeHann) to 10 (Delevingne) years (or just cut out Valerian's line about his history with numerous women...he does not look 31) I actually thought they had decent enough chemistry. I kind of wish I had got around to it when it was in theaters.

B+

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Tue Mar 06, 2018 11:41 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 15 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.