|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 17 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48626 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Evil Dead II
Evil Dead IIQuote: Evil Dead II (also known as Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn) is a 1987 cult comedy horror film and the second installment of the Evil Dead film trilogy. The film was directed by Sam Raimi, written by Raimi and Scott Spiegel, produced by Rob Tapert and starring Bruce Campbell as Ash Williams. Raimi and Spiegel wrote the script during production of Crimewave.
Filming took place in Michigan and North Carolina in 1986 and the film was released in the United States on March 13, 1987. The film was a minor box office success, achieving just under $6 million. As of 2006, the total US box office gross is $10.9 million. It also received critical acclaim. Observers praised Raimi for the direction and Campbell for his role in the film. Evil Dead II was eventually followed by Army of Darkness, which was released in 1992.
|
Sat May 21, 2005 12:49 pm |
|
|
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm Posts: 8626 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
I thought this was actually better than the original. Sure, it wasn't as gory or anything but it was a lot more fun and much more faster. I'd definetely buy this but if I bought this then I'd want to buy the original. Oh well, I will :razz:
8/10 (B+)
_________________ Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land 2. Other People 3. Nocturnal Animals 4. Swiss Army Man 5. Manchester by the Sea 6. The Edge of Seventeen 7. Sing Street 8. Indignation 9. The Lobster 10. Hell or High Water
|
Sat May 21, 2005 1:47 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
A
Essentially, Evil Dead II is a remake of the original movie. The story and the set-up are very similar with five people being stuck in the cabin. It is still a different movie, takes a different route than the original and works very well as a stand alone flick. While the original was a creepy and claustrophobic horror movie with a gore excess, this one already has the humorous undertones that fully manifested in Army of Darkness. Evil Dead II is the movie that actually made Ash the iconic character that he is now (Bruce Campbell rocks in the role). The horror is stil present and so is the suspense, but it is not as intense as in the first movie and the film is more tongue-in-cheek this time around. It's an immense fun to watch, is insanely rewatchable and is good for any film night with friends. This is what horror dreams are made of.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:36 pm |
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Overrated, but still extremely enjoyable. It's very much the "middle" film in the series - not nearly as scary as the original, and not nearly as fun as Army Of Darkness, it kind of finds itself in an odd limbo. Still, Bruce Campbell is pitch perfect as Ash, there's some fantastic direction and camera work by Sam Raimi, and it manages to strike a nice balance between all out horror and comedy. B+
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:32 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
makeshift wrote: Overrated, but still extremely enjoyable. It's very much the "middle" film in the series - not nearly as scary as the original, and not nearly as fun as Army Of Darkness, it kind of finds itself in an odd limbo. Still, Bruce Campbell is pitch perfect as Ash, there's some fantastic direction and camera work by Sam Raimi, and it manages to strike a nice balance between all out horror and comedy. B+
Heretic!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:34 pm |
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: makeshift wrote: Overrated, but still extremely enjoyable. It's very much the "middle" film in the series - not nearly as scary as the original, and not nearly as fun as Army Of Darkness, it kind of finds itself in an odd limbo. Still, Bruce Campbell is pitch perfect as Ash, there's some fantastic direction and camera work by Sam Raimi, and it manages to strike a nice balance between all out horror and comedy. B+ Heretic!
Hehe. I know. It's my one opinion that can get me into some trouble at horror message boards. Whenever I say Evil Dead II is the weakest in the trilogy, I get some angry kids on my hands. I dunno... I consider the original to be one of the best horror films ever made. It's truly frightening. And Army Of Darkness is easily one of the most fun films of all time. So, yeah... it's not that it's (EDII) bad. It's just that the other two are near perfect films.
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:38 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I can live with that
I think the first film, Evil Dead, is the best of the bunch. While it has no real humor, it is the most sickening and the creepiest of the three. It is also one of the creepiest and most unsettling films I have ever seen, very superbly shot. It's in my all-time Top 10 of horror flicks, definitely.
I consider the second just slightly worse, but mostly just...different.
The third is the weakest, IMO (which still means it'd probably be the best horror flick of 2005 if it was released then, hehe). It just is not quite up to the standards of the first two. I think at times it went a little too overboard with humor.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:43 pm |
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I can live with that I think the first film, Evil Dead, is the best of the bunch. While it has no real humor, it is the most sickening and the creepiest of the three. It is also one of the creepiest and most unsettling films I have ever seen, very superbly shot. It's in my all-time Top 10 of horror flicks, definitely. I consider the second just slightly worse, but mostly just...different. The third is the weakest, IMO (which still means it'd probably be the best horror flick of 2005 if it was released then, hehe). It just is not quite up to the standards of the first two. I think at times it went a little too overboard with humor.
Totally agree about the first Evil Dead. I've seen it probably over a hundred times, and there are moments that still make my skin crawl and make hair stand up. What a great film. You know what's fun? Grab a friend that's never seen it before, tell them it's from the guy who directed Spider-Man, have them borrow it, and watch them hate you for the rest of your life. Seriously, Sam Raimi was a sick fuck.
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:48 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
makeshift wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: I can live with that I think the first film, Evil Dead, is the best of the bunch. While it has no real humor, it is the most sickening and the creepiest of the three. It is also one of the creepiest and most unsettling films I have ever seen, very superbly shot. It's in my all-time Top 10 of horror flicks, definitely. I consider the second just slightly worse, but mostly just...different. The third is the weakest, IMO (which still means it'd probably be the best horror flick of 2005 if it was released then, hehe). It just is not quite up to the standards of the first two. I think at times it went a little too overboard with humor. Totally agree about the first Evil Dead. I've seen it probably over a hundred times, and there are moments that still make my skin crawl and make hair stand up. What a great film. You know what's fun? Grab a friend that's never seen it before, tell them it's from the guy who directed Spider-Man, have them borrow it, and watch them hate you for the rest of your life. Seriously, Sam Raimi was a sick fuck.
Hehehe, I did something similar. The two of my friends who borrowed it were freaked out by the fact that actually someone came up with the idea for a girl to be raped by...a tree.
As you can see with Raime and Jackson, horror can bring you pretty far. Oh do I love Braindead...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:55 pm |
|
|
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13400
|
No other film contains equal moments of horror and comedy quite like this one. You'll be cowering under a table 1 minutes and laughing you're head off the next. Poor old Bruce Campbell really does get used as a human punchbag and who knew the rapidly closing camera trick could be so frightening.
A
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:32 pm |
|
|
Terminator1997
George A. Romero
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:30 pm Posts: 9763 Location: Enjoying a cold pint
|
absolutely brilliant. bruce campbell is my hero.
A+
|
Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:11 pm |
|
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
It's nearly as good as the original, and it has the same problems as well. It's just as fantastically directed, has better effects, and Bruce Campbell truly personifies Ash in this one, but the supporting cast is weak at best, the story is lame, and the pacing is even more strange. The beginning of the flick, with just Ash alone in the cabin doing his best horror slapstick, is so excellent that you just want it to span the entire film, but, unfortunately, it does not. Another silly story and some more stupid characters are in store, instead. From that point on, it just feels like a remake of the original, making it rather boring and somewhat of a chore to sit through. The scene where Ash 'becomes' Ash is brilliant though.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:13 pm |
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
yeah... no. I really didnt like it at all
C-
|
Wed Jun 06, 2007 11:19 pm |
|
|
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 37995
|
Re: The Evil Dead II
I give it around a similar grade as the first... in other words, it pretty much rocks. What I liked is that even with the dark comedic side of it, it never went over the line of ridiculousness and slapstick. It treats itself just seriously enough for the mix to work perfectly. My favorite scene was definitley the one where the deer and lamp and books are laughing, just classic.
Bruce Campell steps up his game in this one, and Raimi's direction is similarly fantastic throughout. I did love the "ram-cam" and other close-up effects he used. I also thought the setting of the cabin works really well, it really captures the feeling of no way out from this freaks.
One criticism, I thought the dead in the first film were much creepier and disturbing. They were still a bit creepy in this one, but the comedy side of them took over this time, whereas in the first film I was just plain frightened out of skin of them.
4.5/5
_________________Shackâs top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:10 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: The Evil Dead II
What you wrote in your last paragraph is right on, Shack. This film represents the fitting transition between the first Evil Dead film and the third. The third is more or less pure campy comedy with major horror elements, but essentially, it is comedy. The second film mixes both well, while the first is pretty much straight horror (with some absurd, funny moments) that can be very creepy and scary at times.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:38 pm |
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21641 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: The Evil Dead II
Dr. Lecter wrote: What you wrote in your last paragraph is right on, Shack. This film represents the fitting transition between the first Evil Dead film and the third. The third is more or less pure campy comedy with major horror elements, but essentially, it is comedy. The second film mixes both well, while the first is pretty much straight horror (with some absurd, funny moments) that can be very creepy and scary at times. You can certainly see in Army of Darkness where Hercules and Xena were developed by Raimi.
_________________Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Sun Feb 03, 2008 6:49 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Evil Dead II
I liked it but the middle half with the hand just went on too long and did not work for me. Also the final act with the tree was a bit disappointing to me because the first movie was creepier with just humans I thought it would do something more with the personification of the "devil". Bruce Campbell is decent here and gives his all. I have never watched this movie before but I feel its inferior to Part 1 but I have not seen a movie that mixes horror and comedy this effectively.
B
|
Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:20 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 17 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|