|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Nebs
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm Posts: 6385
|
 M
M Quote: M (German: M - Eine Stadt sucht einen Mörder) is a 1931 German drama-thriller directed by Fritz Lang and written by Lang and his wife Thea von Harbou. It was Lang's first sound film, although he had directed more than a dozen films previously.
The film has become a classic which Lang himself considered his finest work.
_________________ ---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--
|
Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:08 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: M
Probably the first sound masterpiece. Though it's one of the first to use the new technology, it doesn't feel like it, as the camera is fluid and expressive and the sound effects are utilized perfectly and are even essential to the story. Lang's direction is superb, amping up the suspense and terror by using the cinematography, lighting, and sound together to create a very tense and distinctive atmosphere. Peter Lorre is fantastic in what is really the lead role of the film, making us feel sympathy and pity for a horrific child-murderer. The combination of German expressionism, film-noir tendencies, and social commentary that Lang injects into the film makes for a brilliant and gripping work. Simply a terrific film all-around.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:37 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: M
wait is this the same movie as The Third Man?
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:11 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: M
Not at all.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:25 pm |
|
 |
Argos
Z
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm Posts: 7952 Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
|
 Re: M
WILL NICHT, MUSS ZEHN PUNKTE GEBEN.
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:43 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: M
trixster wrote: Not at all. what are you talking about? they both aim to depict broken cities (albeit, a nation or two away from each other) following the destruction of either World War focusing on the rise of organized crimes, corrupt law enforcement and paranoia of the masses. okay, so the plots are different, but they both set out to do nearly exactly the same thing, to serve as a documents of the isolation of civility from urban societies in post-war ages. M is probably more important, but I prefer The Third Man.
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:17 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: M
snackosaurus wrote: trixster wrote: Not at all. what are you talking about? they both aim to depict broken cities (albeit, a nation or two away from each other) following the destruction of either World War focusing on the rise of organized crimes, corrupt law enforcement and paranoia of the masses. okay, so the plots are different, but they both set out to do nearly exactly the same thing, to serve as a documents of the isolation of civility from urban societies in post-war ages. M is probably more important, but I prefer The Third Man. So does every other film noir. If you want to say anything, say that M is the grandaddy of the whole noir genre. But don't single out one film and say they're the same when they only share characteristics of the genre. I love The Third Man too. But it's no more similar to this than The Big Heat or Kiss Me Deadly or any other noir classic.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:35 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: M
to an extent, yes. but for most noir's, post-war devastation --> corruption/moral ambiguity is the setting. but for both of these, it's the point.
anyways, I love them both a whole lot. just saying they're similar.
|
Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:50 pm |
|
 |
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
 Re: M
Wosahs. Absolutely and completely blew me away. I was expecting a lot, but not nearly enough. I am truly shocked at just how incredible this film was. Even though it was made in 1931 it is easily one of the most well constructed and intense horror flicks I have ever seen. I agree mostly with what trixster has said in his review, although I will add that I did not find any sympathy for the killer, but rather a sense of understanding. The film instills no compassion or sympathy but rather a disorienting comprehension of the behavior of the killer. It's truly insightful, not only in the illumination of a horribly distorted mind, but in every aspect it addresses (the law, mob mentality, hypocricy, the paranoia of society, criminal behavior, and the effects one small thing can have on the rest of the world.) Easily one of the greatest films I have ever seen, a masterpiece from top to bottom.
a perfect ten
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Wed May 27, 2009 3:34 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: M
It's Raining Tens! Hallelujah! - It's Raining Tens! Amen! I'm gonna go out to run and let myself get Absolutely soaking wet!
|
Wed May 27, 2009 12:41 pm |
|
 |
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
 Re: M
that was actually funny, a rare thing for you, congratulations.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Wed May 27, 2009 4:34 pm |
|
 |
Argos
Z
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm Posts: 7952 Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
|
 Re: M
In fact rather the reverse is true.
_________________ "Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt." - Arthur Schopenhauer
|
Wed May 27, 2009 5:21 pm |
|
 |
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm Posts: 12333
|
 Re: M
A fantastic crime piece that stands up against the competition over 80 years later. One of my only complaints is that the film really should of ended once the cop lays his hand on M's shoulder. That entire interrogation scene between M and the community is pure gold.
|
Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:41 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: M
um false advertising 
_________________ k
|
Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:38 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40546
|
 Re: M
Yikes, I found this to be VERY disappointing and overrated. I liked the Lorre scenes and all and the courtroom speech is brilliant, but the like 75% portion of this film of police and mob guys sitting around talking about catching him, was unwatchable for me. None of them are established as characters enough to care, nor do they have a direction individually. Barely knew what was happening with that other suspect aiding him (?). Not to mention the scenes had virtually no emotion or personality. Getting bogged down in long, turgid dialog scenes like this instead of getting the storytelling wheels moving, is exactly the type of struggles you’d fear filmmakers to have transitioning to the sound era. The cinematography is good, but in the other parts of filmmaking I thought this had huge flaws.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:26 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 29 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|