Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:38 am



Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 The Hunger Games 

What grade would you give this film?
A 46%  46%  [ 18 ]
B 23%  23%  [ 9 ]
C 10%  10%  [ 4 ]
D 13%  13%  [ 5 ]
F 8%  8%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 39

 The Hunger Games 
Author Message
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Yeah the movie was quite entertaining.

You think about the only entertaining Hp films for general audience were DH2 and GOF...


Anyways pretty solid film. I expected a lot more fighting however I sort of realized this was some crazy stuff. No film is going to glorify kids killing each other. So the fights were short and violent.

Anyways the film focused on the love story and it does lack an epic ending.

However I will remind this is a film made on a 1/3 of the budget of big action summer films.


A-

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:34 pm
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:53 am
Posts: 3007
Post Re: The Hunger Games
2001 wrote:
I thought the production looked cheap at times and the games wasn't anything special in terms of action and emotion like the hype seemed to suggest. The final battle was pretty ordinary and the rest didn't feel as intense as they should have been. That said, it still managed to be consistently entertaining unlike a couple of HP films which is quite an achievement for this film.

B


I agree with this. The final battle felt almost anti-climatic when compared with the mutts chasing scene or Katniss escaping from the burning forest. I also felt that the side plots weren't fully developed and lessened my enjoyment of the movie. I was entertained and interested throughout but I was never fully engaged with the film due to side plots never being fleshed out more than the surface or through implied meaning so more emotional moments had little effect on me.

The shaky cam movement was also stupid. I hated it that half the time I couldn't tell who was hitting who. For a big movie like this, I don't think it was necessary to give it a more first person feel. Although I can understand why they did it, it totally detracted from my experience of someone going to the games for the first time.

It's not all bad though. Jennifer Lawrence was kick ass as Katniss and I really loved the look and feel of the Games. Social and cultural issues were brilliantly highlighted and tackled as well. Most of the rest of the cast did a pretty good job and the editing was very good.

I feel that if they had added on another 30 minutes and discussed more about the side plots then it would have made for a more satisfying film.

B- (7/10)

_________________
June 27 Predictions, April 25 Predictions, April 11 Predictions

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hkreleasedates

Blog: http://hkreleasedates.blogspot.com


Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:46 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: The Hunger Games
I'd rather have a sci-fi movie have some excellent social commentary and mediocre special effects and action scenes (and again I don't think they were intended to be spectacle in the traditional sense) than vice versa.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:09 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: The Hunger Games
I think many were surprised that it was not another twilight style film.

In comparison the Hunger games is just soo much better and frankly in terms of mega hits the only quality film to really appeal to a wide audience since last summer was MI4.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:09 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: The Hunger Games
The "social commentary" of The Hunger Games has been done better in SO many other novels and films.

Brazil and Children of Men being the prime examples, IMO.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:13 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Yeah but no one really expected the THG to be the best film ever.


Compared to the big blockbuster recently, it was a pretty solid film.

Lol maybe because I watched this on a Sunday. For some reason I give pretty generous grades to films I watch on Sunday.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:15 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Mannyisthebest wrote:
Yeah but no one really expected the THG to be the best film ever.

It's a "serious" film, though. It has major actors in the cast. It has a veteran director and a healthy budget. So it doesn't deserve much of a curve, IMO. It should be considered right alongside a film such as Children of Men, and it falls very short.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:20 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Children of Men was a very harsh and depressing film.

THG is a serious film but its about young people, violence and love after all...

I agree it could be better, but perhaps many in the general audiences were expecting it to be like Twilight all over again and it wasnt.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:22 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Indeed. Twilight is loads better. :P

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:24 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: The Hunger Games
David wrote:
Indeed. Twilight is loads better. :P


Oh no you didn't go there.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:33 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Well I think many in the audience expected to be another teen fueled hype machine like Twilight, when they heard all the buzz and praise, they got interested. Add in the marketing that really hyped the film...

I think the film did well in drawing people in but not making people think "this is the best film ever!!, like so many mega blockbusters do".

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:33 pm
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: The Hunger Games
David wrote:
The "social commentary" of The Hunger Games has been done better in SO many other novels and films.

Brazil and Children of Men being the prime examples, IMO.


Dude Brazil and Children of Men are all-time classics. The magnus opus of two truly visionary directors. Seriously, top twenty material both and there's such a broad spectrum between those two and much shittier dystopian sci-fi movies.

What makes The Hunger Games social commentary good is largely its relevance. Whether you hate big centralized government, grotesque wealth inequality, shallow and hypocritical media, seeing the bourgeoisie totally disconnected from reality, or the way we've put a digital barrier between us and the violence we inflict upon the world, The Hunger Games touches upon the issue in both clear and subtle ways.

The other thing that elevated this film is that it did stick to its convictions. District 9 may have had sharper social commentary in the first fifteen minutes, but by the end it's completely sold itself out to become a big cheesy bloodbath. At least The Hunger Games owns up to the inherent awfulness of the violence its characters are forced to go through.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:34 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Magnus wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
The magnus opus


:funny:


:thumbsup:

Na but I still think that class plays into the second half too. I'm just going to straight up quote Devin Faraci for this one:

The political stuff really pops on second viewing. Again, it's understated. Peeta and Katniss have no idea there's a salve that heals wounds so quickly, but it's apparently readily available to people in the Capitol. The stark contrast between haves and have nots is presented but not commented upon. And that stuff isn't science fiction; I'm writing this on a remarkable flat screened iMac while children in Africa don't even have clean water to drink. Our world is exactly as fucked up as Panem.

It really isn't that hard to connect how Effie talks down to these kids who are on death row about manners and how Geraldo lectures the ghost of Trayvon Martin about how his hoodie is half the reason he was shot dead.

Not to mention tracker jackers are terrifying plausible as they've already created genetically modified mosquitos...


Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:49 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Magnus wrote:
as g said, the cream comes more off as quick solution to progress the plot rather than a look at how fucked up society is.

oh, and David Faraci is never a good person to quote on anything.


I'd argue the fact that these kids are chosen by lottery to kill each other shows how fucked up the society is on a basic fundamental level, and the voyeurism of the audience (yes, you too) throughout plays into how these characters act. After all, they emphasize throughout that it's the opinion of the sponsors that can determine if they live or die.

I won't disagree that this could have been more fluidly integrated into the story, just as the psychotic behavior of the District 1 kids who have been raised to kill might have been shown with a bit more nuance than "I'm so fucking nuts I'm just gonna monologue about how excited I am to kill you." At the same time, she probably Monologued to give the audience a show. And of course, when Katniss actually humanizes Rue she breaks the input-only stream of the games, which unleashes an Arab Spring-style riot that feels very much of the Internet age. It's a cool moment because it shows the contrast between the inherent dehumanization that comes with being projected on a screen and the Internet optimism that this technology can allow people from disparate societies to connect behind a common revolution. Again, it's not as well shot as Children of Men are as lavish as Brazil but the ideas are there, and they do connect to the narrative in a very real way. President Snowe (and by the way the acting in this movie from the supporting cast was great. Donald Sutherland is excllent at purring menace) explains to the game master how Hope is as necessary a commodity to the public as apathy but it must be controlled and contained. There's obvious implications about how Brand Obama used Hope as a slogan, only to then have to work within the confines of the fucked up system Panem clearly represents. They couldn't let Katniss and Peeta die because when the society sees there being no hope (or no social safety net) to balance the lack of freedom, they have nothing to lose by rebelling.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Magnus wrote:
the ideas are there; the execution isnt I think.


You mean it's not that great of a film stylistically? Because I won't argue with you there, the CGI is noticable and the shaky cam is distracting when it's not motivated but I do think the film intentionally understates some of the sci-fi ideas while also making some really blatant, and overall conveys a lot without being overly expository.

If you are talking about the execution of the ideas being lacking, well I guess like A Dangerous Method I just prefer a bit more subtlety. You can really find critiques in our present day system on every end of the political, class, and even gender spectrum. Of course the audience thinks Katniss should have some contrived romance with Peeta. Her subjugating herself to this scenario could be a large reason she wins the games. I much prefer the ambiguity of their relationship to a perfectly executed (that is to say emotionally manipulative) Epic Romance.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:46 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Magnus wrote:
This is much better than A Dangerous Method, which wasnt subtle but just boring. This is just lacking.


Your reviews are lacking. :watsup:


Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:16 pm
Profile
The Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Different places!
Post Re: The Hunger Games
I liked the first half or so but ended up really being bored and annoyed with it. Like, there was a lot to like. Banks was great, as was Bentley, Tucci and Sutherland. Lawrence was perfectly cast, I thought. I liked Hutcherson too.

I liked the photography and editing immensely. It just ended up feeling so slight. The visual effects were a disaster. It makes the Titan movies look like Avatar.

I also missed things like why Katniss's presence in her home is so important. It's only in that brief flashback that you know that it's because her mother goes catatonic after her father dies. That would have been better said upfront. And when her and Gale see the ship overhead at the beginning? It feels kind of meaningless without them seeing it pick up that girl (in the book). I also was disappointed that we didn't get to see Katniss pig out in the dining car. There is a significant amount of uncouth behavior (relatively speaking, of course) in her but it mostly amounted to slightly stunned blank stares whenever she saw something new.

_________________
Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:22 pm
Profile
The Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Different places!
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Oh, and in my mind the costumes were a much more refined level of eccentric weirdness but as presented they looked like they came from RuPaul's Drag Race.

Party City spooks, the lot of 'em.

_________________
Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:29 pm
Profile
The Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Different places!
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Magnus wrote:
erikdean wrote:
Oh, and in my mind the costumes were a much more refined level of eccentric weirdness but as presented they looked like they came from RuPaul's Drag Race.

Party City spooks, the lot of 'em.


I enjoyed the costumes. They were cross-dressy but the contract worked against the attire of all the District folks.


I liked them too, it just wasn't quite what I thought. They just looked a bit trashy. Compared to say, the craziness of the costumes in The Fifth Element. Granted, we're talking about Jean Paul Gaultier there but in that film I felt the costuming was creative and inventive and not simply bright or vivid or colorful.

_________________
Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:35 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:43 pm
Posts: 2252
Location: Wellsville, MO
Post Re: The Hunger Games
I think there may be something lost in translation since the book is written in first-person present and the movie is basically third-person omniscient. So much of the impact of the theme in the book is pointed out through Katniss's thoughts; can't get that in the movie. That's one reason they added scenes like Snow & Crane in the rose garden talking about hope; that scene is original to the movie and is meant to help further the theme of the story that is lost in translation.

Additionally, because the book narration resides in Katniss's head, so much of it is thoughts, not actions. When you distill the book into what happens in the physical world to put on-screen... well, you get what we got! Which leads to quite a bit of subtlety with the theme. But we'll get much more concrete stuff in the next one.

Yeah, the graphics were pretty bad, but thankfully a majority of the film didn't call for them, which is probably why they stood out so much. It was mainly the Avenue of the Tributes scene that really displayed the bad CG. I'm imagining the next movie will have a larger budget and therefore will have better graphics.

I do have to wonder how many scenes were shot but not included because of just how long the movie became. I mean, it's what? 2.5 hours long?

As a book-to-movie adaptation, this was probably the best I've ever seen.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:44 pm
Profile WWW
The Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Different places!
Post Re: The Hunger Games
tina_als_girl wrote:

As a book-to-movie adaptation, this was probably the best I've ever seen.


Image

_________________
Image


Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:09 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: The Hunger Games
I really didn't like the relationship angle. Seemed way forced. And it seems like she doesn't care about him, even at the end.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:16 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post Re: The Hunger Games
Chippy wrote:
I really didn't like the relationship angle. Seemed way forced. And it seems like she doesn't care about him, even at the end.

Exactly. She was trying to win favor with the audience so she could potentially win.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:19 pm
Profile
Wallflower
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 34875
Location: Minnesota
Post Re: The Hunger Games
MG Casey wrote:
Chippy wrote:
I really didn't like the relationship angle. Seemed way forced. And it seems like she doesn't care about him, even at the end.

Exactly. She was trying to win favor with the audience so she could potentially win.


Yeah, apparently at the end of the book while they're on the train she tells him it was just an act to win.

I'm excited to see this again. It's such an immensely entertaining film. Could have been longer, IMO. Would love to see an extended version on Blu-ray.


Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:26 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: The Hunger Games
MG Casey wrote:
Chippy wrote:
I really didn't like the relationship angle. Seemed way forced. And it seems like she doesn't care about him, even at the end.

Exactly. She was trying to win favor with the audience so she could potentially win.

It's interesting the film completely jettisoned this in favor of it just being a full-on love story.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:32 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.