|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
The Maltese Falcon (1941)
The Maltese Falcon (1941)
Author |
Message |
Nebs
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm Posts: 6385
|
The Maltese Falcon (1941)
The Maltese FalconQuote: The Maltese Falcon is a 1941 Warner Bros. film based on the novel of the same name by Dashiell Hammett and a remake of the 1931 film of the same name. Written and directed by John Huston, the film stars Humphrey Bogart as private investigator Sam Spade; Mary Astor as his femme fatale client; Gladys George, who received third billing despite having a relatively minor role; Peter Lorre; and Sydney Greenstreet in his film debut. The film was Huston's directorial debut and was nominated for three Academy Awards.
The story concerns a San Francisco private detective's dealings with three unscrupulous adventurers who compete to obtain a fabulous jewel-encrusted statuette of a falcon.
The Maltese Falcon has been named as one of the greatest films of all time by Roger Ebert, and Entertainment Weekly, and was cited by Panorama du Film Noir Américain, the first major work on film noir, as the first film of that genre.
The film premiered on October 3, 1941, in New York City and was selected for inclusion in the Library of Congress' National Film Registry in 1989.
_________________ ---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--
|
Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:41 am |
|
|
thompsoncory
Rachel McAdams Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am Posts: 14544 Location: LA / NYC
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
I actually think this film is kind of overrated, mainly because I'm not the biggest fan of film noir. From a filmmaking standpoint it's excellent, but I wasn't a fan of the screenplay much at all. Performances were quite good though.
B
|
Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:40 pm |
|
|
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
I agree that is is a little overrated. Good perfromances, though.
B
|
Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:14 pm |
|
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
Incredibly quick-paced and slavishly faithful to the novel, it definitely deserves its classic status, but I wouldn't call it the greatest noir ever made. Bogart is pitch-perfect as Sam Spade, and Lorre and Greenstreet do great supporting work, and the dialogue is just as slick and snappy as it is in the book. But that's because it's the exact same dialogue, save for the famous last words. For someone who'd never read the novel, I'm sure it would be fresh and exciting, but for me, having just read the novel, it was kinda boring. Same with the story; I knew exactly what was gonna happen. This is only a minor knock against the film, because it's solidly directed by Huston and it's very entertaining. But it's not a masterpiece.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:26 pm |
|
|
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
Here you go, Lecter.
I have nothing to add to the Maltese discourse. This is, without a doubt, among the best Hollywood pictures ever made.
_________________ k
|
Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:11 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Thanks, yosh!
B+
The Maltese Falcon is one of the oldest BP nominees that I have seen to date and I'm not sure that in our days and time the movie would have received such acclaim and awards attention. That's not to say that it's a mediocre film, it sure as hell isn't and I'm sure it is of historical significance, being one of the first, maybe even the first movie of its kind with its distinct film noir feel, but I feel that all the historical importance aside, better noirs have been made after it and not all were showered with as much praise.
However, it certainly does deserve the praise for some of its aspects. First of all, Humphrey Bogart makes this film. He IS the movie and everything it embodies. I'm not sure why Sidney Greenstreet was nominated for an Oscar in his rather unimpressive role, but Bogart was snubbed. Bogart's Sam Spade is the prototype of a noir anti-hero. Spade is an asshole, there's little noble about him, he's not a polite, politically correct shiny hero and for that he feels quite real and is simply cool. Bogart manages the character perfectly. As for the rest of the cast, they all just play second fiddle to Bogart. I found Peter Lorre pretty good and it was interesting how the filmmakers didn't really try to hide the character's homosexuality. That was rather surprising. Mary Astor, on the other hand, wasn't a very good femme fatale, in my opinion. I didn't really feel the chemistry between her and Bogart and that was supposed to be one of the film's essential parts. Therefore, Bogart's decision at the end didn't feel as heavy. Sidney Greenstreet delivers a solid, though not really remarkable performance.
John Huston did a decent job directing this film, but even moreso with adapting Dashiell Hammett's original novel. The dialogues are spraking, but as I said, it would be nothing without Bogart's great delivery of his lines. The storyline itself was quite interesting. Probably the best part of the whole thing was the fact that the Maltese Falcon never actually appears in the film and is never really found. The falcon itself is besides the point, it's Spade's search for the murderer of his partner. That only becomes clear at the very end and the way the movie leads up to that is quite smart.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:35 pm |
|
|
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8636 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
I can see why it is so loved and respected.
i think the name is so unique and exotic so you would remember it.
I just love the line "what dreams are made off"
_________________The Dark Prince
|
Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:16 am |
|
|
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11006 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
Yes better film-noir was made, but Bogart in my opinion gives his most iconic performance in this film, and is sort of like Downey Jr. with Iron Man in that he makes this film work.
A-
_________________
|
Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:09 pm |
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
Re: The Maltese Falcon
The production from top to bottom is impeccable and the performances all around are magnificent. The screenplay excells with its unrelenting fast pace and fascinating insights to the characters it unrolls. The cynicism of the entire ordeal is quite in keeping with the darker edge that the film puts up. And yet, it never really reaches that level of awe that Billy Wilder and Joseph Mankiewicz have provided for me before. It's a magnificient film, have no doubt, and deserves top recognition, but it just doesn't have the secret ingredient propelling it beyond all expectation and into the list of all time bests, unlike Sunset Boulevard and All About Eve.
a perfect score
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:13 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 75 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|