Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 12:14 pm



Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
 George Washington 

What grade would you give this film?
A 50%  50%  [ 1 ]
B 50%  50%  [ 1 ]
C 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 2

 George Washington 
Author Message
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post George Washington
George Washington

Image

Quote:
George Washington is a 2000 American drama film about a group of children in a depressed small town in North Carolina. The children band together to cover up a tragic mistake. The film is written and directed by David Gordon Green.

_________________
---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--


Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:38 am
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: George Washington
So this is rather brilliant.

It's refreshing to see a first-time feature not overcome with overly stylish tics or obvious auteurist traits, and yet Green's form of poetic realism is at once minimalist and expressive. I suppose it's not fair to say it's not a film of style, because it is; it's just that Green's style is so low-key and down-to-earth that it's hardly noticeable. But this is only a good thing. It's not so overwhelmed with being artsy that it forgets to be art, but it also doesn't feel like any hack-for-hire could've directed it. It's an auteur work, yes, but not one primarily concerned with indicating this. As I said, refreshing.

Because of this, Green's camera is able to film the events naturally, unhampered by choppy editing or aesthetic quirks, giving the action a kind of beautiful realism. Green captures mundane, everyday places - the run-down factory, the disgusting public washroom, the graffiti-infested junkyard - using slow-motion, soft lighting, and wide angles, turning the seemingly ugly locales into something rhythmic and lyrical. This is reflected in the dialogue as well - whether it be the gently stylized narration or the innocuous, childlike conversations - giving the whole film a naturally beautiful sheen.

I also love how the film never quite makes it sure what exactly it's about, instead choosing to keep the audience guessing throughout. Is it a nostalgic look back at that last summer of innocence, before puberty started taking over? Is it a expression of the idyllic nature of childhood? Or it it merely the rose-coloured portrayal of one boy, seen through the eyes of his crush? It never seems to settle on a distinctive theme, but that only makes it more intriguing and interesting.

So you can rest easy, makeshift, as I loved this. Enough to make me watch the rest of Green's work back-to-back-to-back. So I'll be reviewing All the Real Girls soon.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:52 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37993
Post Re: George Washington
ATRG is pretty drivel.. as in "beautiful drivel", not "sort of drivel"

Snow Angels, though :wub2:

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:05 pm
Profile
Teenage Dream

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
Post Re: George Washington
I wrote this about George Washington after I saw it about a year ago. It's not a great review by any means, but I still feel like it reflects my love for this movie in a pretty good light:

Quote:
George Washington, along with David Lynch's Mulholland Drive and Terrence Malick's The New World, is the first seminal piece of American film art this decade has seen. When viewing George Washington, people often make the mistake of watching it in the same manner one watches the majority of films they see. Things like plot and structure are at the forefront of what they are looking for. The problem lies with the fact that George Washington isn't about plot or structure - it's about feelings and mood. Memory, regret, frustration and loss is what this film is about. Yes, there is a vague outline of traditional film narrative in the sense that events take place that propel the film into motion, but to allow (force?) yourself to view the film with your sights set on these ultimately rudimentary aspects is to do a great disservice to both yourself and the artist in question, David Gordon Green. In order to truly apprciate this film for the utter and complete masterpiece it is, you have to be willing to give yourself over to its "voluptuous languor", as film critic Roger Ebert so beautifully put it.

A great number of films have dealt with the theme of one's desire to transcend their position in life, but I'm not sure I've seen a single one deal with it in the way George Washington does, and execute it with such beauty and grace. This film is not afraid to allow its characters to fail the way other films dealing with this subject are. In fact, I would go as far to say the film's core is about failure. It revels in the heartbreak and melancholy that comes with both the reflection of life's missteps and where you are today because of them (George's aunt and uncle - in fact, all of the adults found in this film), and also experiencing them first hand in your youth (virtually every event the children in the film go through). Even the film's landscape is tantamount to this idea - a rustic, industrial wasteland, overgrowing with weeds and graffiti.

The true power of George Washington, and in filmmaker David Gordon Green, is its ability to reveal the overwhelming beauty hidden in not only the aforementioned vistas, but also the failures of the film's characters. This is accomplished through both the films stunning technical prowess (the direction, cinematography and musical score are simply unparalleled in my view) and its heartwrenching, essentialy poetic dialogue. Every time Nasia delivers one of her truly memorable monologues, my heart breaks in two. Vernon has a soliloquy that begins with "I wish..." that rivals anything I've heard in any film before or since in terms of sheer emotional weight. The extremely realistic, but still highly artistic way the dialogue is both written and delivered is something I've never actually seen pulled off in a film before.

Everything comes together in this film in such a way that is so rare and so transcendent that I truly feel like the importance of this film, at least from an artistic standpoint, can not be overstated. It is said that David Gordon Green obsessed over the work of Terrence Malick while preparing to make George Washington, and it's clear in not only the visual poetry and use of a musical score that is ambient in nature with long chords and drawn out sounds, but also the nearly crippling emotional impact the film has on you. To watch George Washington is to become immersed in a film and intoxicated in an environment and mood created by a film. It reminds you of the potential power hidden in this unique art form, and it reminded me of why I love movies.


Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:23 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.