new page because its needed before my router explodes.

The movie wasn't made for all people; I liked it though.

Its one of several million examples. But yes its a glaring one.

agent 47 does start out in a vineyard in Hitman 2 the video game

the games are incredible and i'm not even a gamer. The only games I own are ncaa football, fifa, madden, and nba, but i always buy the hitman games when they come out

I'd have to agree with Jim on this one. The games are fantastic.

The movie... I'll wait till I see it to pass Judgment, but it probably sucks.

if you go in knowing it's just going to be 90 minutes of action with weak dialogue and a plot that is paper thin, then you'll enjoy it. that's how i went it.

Hitman beat its 20 million budget LOL

I don't understand how people weren't going in with that mindset. I walked in not expecting anything and I was entertained overall.



When all is said and done, it'll make double that domestically and tripled that worldwide. Bring on the sequel.

i was hoping this would be better - different - from most video game adaptations, but it ultimately was nothing more than a mindless, pretty-looking standard action flick. Generic in every way, led by a pretty weak Timothy Olyphant, containing a lot of really cliched characters and moments, etc... it was fun to watch - and the black humor was good - but the overall movie was nothing special at all.

C-

B


It's the most incoherent and plotless movie I have seen in some time and yet I couldn't help, but enjoy it. I won't even get started here on the film's content, except for one thing: I was utterly pissed when nothing was resovled at the end of the m0vie. Who was that double who put on the president's face?! It all seemed to be leading up to a big reveal and then at the end, when he won't tell the truth to 47, 47 simply kills him and then it's over. That annoyed me more than anything else.

However, I think it's a aesthetically well-made actioner. The action scenes are really well-done and choreographed, especially the train fight. Makes me happy that the guy who directed that one will be making the next Transporter flick. He certainly knows his stuff when it comes to shooting action. The final is pretty decent as well. Timothy Olyphant surprised me by actually fitting the role (didn't expect that at all) and Olga Kurylenko is certainly easy on the eyes.

I just say I laughed hard when I saw a stark mad Henry Ian Cusick (Lost's Desmond) shooting those two big machine guns and screaming. It just looked so absurd.

I think they should bring on a sequel. I wasn't too hot on the first Transporter flick either and the second was actually an improvement, so why not trying with this one?

I hear ya! I watched it yesterday, well, not all of it. I only made it through an hour and couldn't finish it. This sucked! I know you have to suspend disbelief with action movies, but this was so implausible and ridiculous. And this is coming from someone who had no problem with Transporter 2. One thing that annoyed me the most was his smoothly sliding down the elevator cables with his bare hands. Come on! This movie was just so illogical. I didn't need to watch the whole thing to know that it sucked on a whole. There's no way it could have magically gotten better and become good. It was just too late to turn things around.