Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 8:48 am



Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
 National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj 

What grade would you give this film?
A 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
B 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
C 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 100%  100%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 1

 National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj
National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj

Image

Quote:
National Lampoon's Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj is a 2006 sequel to the 2002 comedy National Lampoon's Van Wilder starring Kal Penn. Despite the film's title, lead actor Ryan Reynolds does not return in his role as Van Wilder.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:05 am
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40248
Post 
C

Biggest problem with Rise of Taj is that it's simply average. It's not really a gross-out comedy at all like the first, other than the name you can't find much similarities between them... It's just your typical college movie, blah blah fraternity competition, underdog casted out fraternity, prats, almost cheating on exam and getting expelled, girl switching sides, it's the exact same movie National Lampoon has been making for years with the Van Wilder tag slapped on it, nothing more.

On the plus side the female lead in Lauren Cohen is a huge improvement over Tara Reid, and it is on her back that the relationship between her and Penn is made almost believable, and she is overall the highlight of the film. She also carries the highlight of the film, a ballroom fencing scene.

For those who hated the over the top gross-out of the original, the C level grade of the sequel would probably seem an improvement, since the film isn't necessarily bad, it's just average and a little stale and boring. Mostly a forgettable comedy that has been done exactly the same far too many times before.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:56 am
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Yeah, the film is very, very generic. I've seen the same plot so many times now I'm sick of it and expect more. Where's the creativity?

Grade: C-


Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:07 am
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post 
Painful. I expected it to be moronic, but not so incredibly, incredibly dull. F.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:53 pm
Profile
problem?

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
Post 
I only rented it cause it was free. I had three movies and they were like "You can get a fourth for free!" so I did. And it still isn't worth seeing even if you can get it for free.

_________________
Image


Thu Apr 05, 2007 5:02 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
Painfully unfunny.


Thu Apr 05, 2007 5:20 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 6 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.