Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:50 pm



Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
 The Exorcist III 

What grade would you give this film?
A 50%  50%  [ 1 ]
B 50%  50%  [ 1 ]
C 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 2

 The Exorcist III 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post The Exorcist III
The Exorcist III

Image

Quote:
The Exorcist III is a 1990 American supernatural thriller written and directed by William Peter Blatty. It is the second sequel of The Exorcist series and a film adaptation of Blatty's novel, Legion (1983). The film stars George C. Scott, Brad Dourif, Ed Flanders, and Nicol Williamson. This is the only Exorcist film not to be distributed theatrically by Warner Bros.

Set fifteen years after the original film and ignoring the events of Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977), the film centers around the philosophical Lieutenant William F. Kinderman from the first film, investigating a baffling series of murders in Georgetown that appear to have a satanic motive behind them and furthermore have all the hallmarks of "The Gemini", a deceased serial killer.

Originally titled Legion, the film was drastically changed in post-production with re-writes and re-shoots ordered by the studio executives of Morgan Creek Productions, demanding the last-minute addition of an exorcism sequence, and the film was released as The Exorcist III in order to be more commercial. The final version differed from Blatty's vision; all of the cut footage is apparently lost.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:47 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Surprisingly good second sequel, especially given the quality of Exorcist II. Blatty is a pretty good director, as some of the shots are stunning in their patience and composition (the hallway scene especially). The visuals are impressive and effective, and not overused. Unfortunately, the story doesn't quite measure up. It's an interesting blend of the first Exorcist and the real-life Zodiac killings, but it doesn't work as well as it should, and sometimes loses the viewer to confusion. The ending doesn't fit at all, either, along with the whole subplot with Father Morning, though I know that's not Blatty's fault. Still, it takes away from the film, which doesn't need an exorcism at the end to remain effectively scary. All in all, it's a good film that unfortunately suffers from studio pressure.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:08 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21641
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
trixster wrote:
Surprisingly good second sequel, especially given the quality of Exorcist II. Blatty is a pretty good director, as some of the shots are stunning in their patience and composition (the hallway scene especially). The visuals are impressive and effective, and not overused. Unfortunately, the story doesn't quite measure up. It's an interesting blend of the first Exorcist and the real-life Zodiac killings, but it doesn't work as well as it should, and sometimes loses the viewer to confusion. The ending doesn't fit at all, either, along with the whole subplot with Father Morning, though I know that's not Blatty's fault. Still, it takes away from the film, which doesn't need an exorcism at the end to remain effectively scary. All in all, it's a good film that unfortunately suffers from studio pressure.


Its a great sequel that would have been awesome if it stuck with the original ending, the producers made them refilm all of the ending and the casting of the priest from the first film. The film originally didnt have an exorcism. So the tone changes very drastically at the end. but apart from that it was very chilling and a creepy film, B+. I'd say easily the best exorcist film after the first.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:18 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 63 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.