Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:18 pm



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
 To Kill a Mockingbird 

What grade would you give this film?
A 70%  70%  [ 7 ]
B 20%  20%  [ 2 ]
C 10%  10%  [ 1 ]
D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 10

 To Kill a Mockingbird 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post To Kill a Mockingbird
To Kill a Mockingbird

Image

Quote:
To Kill a Mockingbird is a 1962 American drama film adaptation of Harper Lee's novel of the same name directed by Robert Mulligan. It stars Mary Badham in the role of Scout and Gregory Peck in the role of Atticus Finch.

In 1995, the film was listed in the National Film Registry. It also ranks twenty-fifth on the American Film Institute's 10th anniversary list of the greatest American movies of all time. In 2003, AFI named Atticus Finch the greatest movie hero of the 20th century.

To Kill a Mockingbird marks the film debuts of Robert Duvall, William Windom, and Alice Ghostley.


Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:45 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Amazing.

A


Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:53 pm
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post 
if someone votes below n a their on mad crack. this is greg pecks signiture films. amazing...and im waiting for the remake....


Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:12 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:43 pm
Posts: 2252
Location: Wellsville, MO
Post 
Well, at least it seems thus far all of us are clean... LOL

This movie is BRILLIANT. One of the best in the entire 100+ years of filmmaking.

Joy


Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:17 pm
Profile WWW
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37964
Post 
C+

Overrated. Yes, I just went there. It just seemed rather dated and now ordinary to me. I'm sure it's issues stirred up a shitstorm back then, but for enjoyment and entertainment in this day and age? Nah. Peck is rather annoying in the film, I really don't like his big booming voice. One bright spot though is Bedham, who I can say gives one of the best child performances that I've ever seen.

Anyways, as if all this wasn't enough, I had just finished reading the book before I saw the movie, and let me tell you...It didn't help. The adapting itself is one of the most uninspired and lazy jobs that I've ever seen. I can understand being faithful, but they take it way too far. Physically, almost all the lines in the film are directly taken from the text dialouge. This is particularily evident in the courtroom scene, where it goes on for 25 minutes straight 100% reading from the book. There's barely a single line in there that is not lifted word for word from the book. I think Atticus throws a cup at one point to prove Tom's handicap, but that's all I can remember being original.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:06 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Shack wrote:
C+

Overrated. Yes, I just went there. It just seemed rather dated and now ordinary to me. I'm sure it's issues stirred up a shitstorm back then, but for enjoyment and entertainment in this day and age? Nah. Peck is rather annoying in the film, I really don't like his big booming voice. One bright spot though is Bedham, who I can say gives one of the best child performances that I've ever seen.

Anyways, as if all this wasn't enough, I had just finished reading the book before I saw the movie, and let me tell you...It didn't help. The adapting itself is one of the most uninspired and lazy jobs that I've ever seen. I can understand being faithful, but they take it way too far. Physically, almost all the lines in the film are directly taken from the text dialouge. This is particularily evident in the courtroom scene, where it goes on for 25 minutes straight 100% reading from the book. There's barely a single line in there that is not lifted word for word from the book. I think Atticus throws a cup at one point to prove Tom's handicap, but that's all I can remember being original.


Get out.

It's bad because it's dated and ordinary NOW? What a ridiculous criticism.


Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:53 pm
Profile
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
Post 
Great Book / Great Movie / Great Georgory Peck Performance plus others

****************************

Also for anyone who saw Capote, there are Harper Lee tie ins to Kill a Mockingbird.


Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Libs wrote:
Shack wrote:
C+

Overrated. Yes, I just went there. It just seemed rather dated and now ordinary to me. I'm sure it's issues stirred up a shitstorm back then, but for enjoyment and entertainment in this day and age? Nah. Peck is rather annoying in the film, I really don't like his big booming voice. One bright spot though is Bedham, who I can say gives one of the best child performances that I've ever seen.

Anyways, as if all this wasn't enough, I had just finished reading the book before I saw the movie, and let me tell you...It didn't help. The adapting itself is one of the most uninspired and lazy jobs that I've ever seen. I can understand being faithful, but they take it way too far. Physically, almost all the lines in the film are directly taken from the text dialouge. This is particularily evident in the courtroom scene, where it goes on for 25 minutes straight 100% reading from the book. There's barely a single line in there that is not lifted word for word from the book. I think Atticus throws a cup at one point to prove Tom's handicap, but that's all I can remember being original.


Get out.

It's bad because it's dated and ordinary NOW? What a ridiculous criticism.


I haven't seen the film, so I won't judge it, but IF it is really dated and IF it does seem ordinary then it is fair criticism. I don't buy into the crap of "Oh this film was so great in its time!" that is usually said when I claim my dislike for The Exorcist. Films that can stand the test of time are the ones that deserve the praise, not those that used to be excellent in a certain time period.

That said, I haven't seen it, so maybe it is not dated and ordinary now...

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:32 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
Post 
Shack wrote:
C+

Overrated. Yes, I just went there. It just seemed rather dated and now ordinary to me. I'm sure it's issues stirred up a shitstorm back then, but for enjoyment and entertainment in this day and age? Nah. Peck is rather annoying in the film, I really don't like his big booming voice. One bright spot though is Bedham, who I can say gives one of the best child performances that I've ever seen.

Anyways, as if all this wasn't enough, I had just finished reading the book before I saw the movie, and let me tell you...It didn't help. The adapting itself is one of the most uninspired and lazy jobs that I've ever seen. I can understand being faithful, but they take it way too far. Physically, almost all the lines in the film are directly taken from the text dialouge. This is particularily evident in the courtroom scene, where it goes on for 25 minutes straight 100% reading from the book. There's barely a single line in there that is not lifted word for word from the book. I think Atticus throws a cup at one point to prove Tom's handicap, but that's all I can remember being original.


- Big deal that the issue is dated - well what do you expect as it was made 50 years ago > what was important back then wouldn't be now.

- Peck is annoying - OK, if you say so - but I will go with most people who rated Peck as one of the greatest actors ever and this one of the best roles ever.

- And in ending as you are bitching that it was straight out of the book > who cares if it was - it was a prized book and movie with most people except you - so they kept it very faithful to the book.

- and yes, this is no One Tree Hill. Thank God.


Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:46 pm
Profile WWW
Some days I'm a super bitch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
Post 
One of the many reasons why Gregory Peck rocked. It's just a beautiful, poetic, and eloquent movie.

A


Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:40 am
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
Post 
Cotton wrote:
One of the many reasons why Gregory Peck rocked. It's just a beautiful, poetic, and eloquent movie.

A


and that is what people miss when they complain about movies being outdated.

There are other parts of the movie to still appreciate.


Fri Feb 03, 2006 12:29 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: To Kill a Mockingbird
Yes really the greatness of Peck and how he seems to be a man of a such a grand stature really makes you go "woh" even today. Especially the scene where he walks out of the courtroom and all of the Black people stand up to pay respect...

A powerful scene with many other scenes and it would be better in Colour but oh well.

A-

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Mon May 26, 2008 11:38 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post Re:
Shack wrote:
C+

Overrated. Yes, I just went there. It just seemed rather dated and now ordinary to me. I'm sure it's issues stirred up a shitstorm back then, but for enjoyment and entertainment in this day and age? Nah. Peck is rather annoying in the film, I really don't like his big booming voice. One bright spot though is Bedham, who I can say gives one of the best child performances that I've ever seen.

Anyways, as if all this wasn't enough, I had just finished reading the book before I saw the movie, and let me tell you...It didn't help. The adapting itself is one of the most uninspired and lazy jobs that I've ever seen. I can understand being faithful, but they take it way too far. Physically, almost all the lines in the film are directly taken from the text dialouge. This is particularily evident in the courtroom scene, where it goes on for 25 minutes straight 100% reading from the book. There's barely a single line in there that is not lifted word for word from the book. I think Atticus throws a cup at one point to prove Tom's handicap, but that's all I can remember being original.


quit lying.

A

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Tue May 27, 2008 12:05 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.