Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 4:46 am



Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 X-Men Origins: Wolverine 

What grade would you give this film?
A 15%  15%  [ 6 ]
B 23%  23%  [ 9 ]
C 31%  31%  [ 12 ]
D 21%  21%  [ 8 ]
F 10%  10%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 39

 X-Men Origins: Wolverine 
Author Message
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
MR. GREEN wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
D.

I watched the work print and it was horrible. Honestly one of the worst superhero flicks i've seen in a long time.


So you'd rather have seen an unfinished work vs the finished product that came out today and if so, why?? Was this a way to simply find a way to hate on it knowing it wasn't finished??


i saw the work print about a month ago. i havent had time to go see the finished product


Fri May 01, 2009 1:52 pm
Profile
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6326
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
What a sad, shit movie.

The only good things are Jackman's performance, the action sequences which were pretty solid and fun overall, and Kayla's story which is the only thing that wasn't completely predictable.

The overall plot could've been good but the horrific editing and random jumping around made it a mess.

Everyone except Stryker, Victor (the bitch who played him also did a good job), Kayla and Wolverine were one-dimensional shit characters that served very little purpose in the story. Then there's the retarded dialogue, shit ending, the completely WTF thing at the end which was definetely not Patrick Stewart, the fact that there are continuity errors from X2 (FAILLL), casting Will.i.am.

C

_________________
.


Fri May 01, 2009 2:40 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 2388
Location: Poland
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
This movie was disappointing :(

I'll give it a C.

To compare to other X-Men movies: First was B+, second was A and third was B.


Fri May 01, 2009 2:56 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Well, I never saw the work print but it certainly troubled me and the reviews were not helping either, especially with them being even worst than X3, but I thought the movie kicked ass for the most part. It felt more like the old cartoon.

There is some certain pacing issues and weakness in the beginning, but the rest is a very solid comic book movie. I really wished they stayed more with the team of mutants in the beginning because the first 20 minutes is very rushed. But once it kicks into the story its simple but I think it works. Hugh Jackman is still awesome as Wolverine and this film may not be X2, but its in leagues with say X-men, The Incredible Hulk, and Iron Man. A-

Oh and the crowd really liked it, its going to play very well I think it will certainly better received than X3

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri May 01, 2009 6:03 pm
Profile
Z
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm
Posts: 7952
Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Thegun wrote:
Hugh Jackman is still awesome as Wolverine and this film may not be X2, but its in leagues with say X-men, The Incredible Hulk, and Iron Man. A-

Hehe.

_________________
"Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt."
- Arthur Schopenhauer


Fri May 01, 2009 6:25 pm
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Thegun wrote:
Well, I never saw the work print but it certainly troubled me and the reviews were not helping either, especially with them being even worst than X3, but I thought the movie kicked ass for the most part. It felt more like the old cartoon.

There is some certain pacing issues and weakness in the beginning, but the rest is a very solid comic book movie. I really wished they stayed more with the team of mutants in the beginning because the first 20 minutes is very rushed. But once it kicks into the story its simple but I think it works. Hugh Jackman is still awesome as Wolverine and this film may not be X2, but its in leagues with say X-men, The Incredible Hulk, and Iron Man. A-

Oh and the crowd really liked it, its going to play very well I think it will certainly better received than X3


If it's as good as The INCREDIBLE HULK, then I'll be pleased, except for making SABERTOOTH a normal size Man and not the Hulking SABERTOOTH we saw in the 1st X-MEN movie played by Tyler Mane.. You think "Continuity" was tossed out the window on that deal or what?? How the fuck do you explain that snafu?? :whistle:


Fri May 01, 2009 6:55 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
I dont think so, I mean lets be honest the first X-men had its own share of flaws, it was just an awesome story with depth and paced really well. Sabertooth was completely tossed aside. I think the major complaint has nothing to do with the Wolverine/Sabertooth Dynamic, they got it right here and both are portrayed awesomely. Its the minor characters that get poured in. really most minor key characters have 1 full scene and then some quick pop up moments.

There is always bound to be continuity problems, but I thought Wolverine has no laughably bad ones. I'll take a good actor over a big guy anyway, and Schrieber is still pretty huge and menacing in this film.

I think the best thing about this film is that Wolverine was very tame in the last film. He is more of a badass in this one then in any other.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri May 01, 2009 7:09 pm
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Thegun wrote:
I dont think so, I mean lets be honest the first X-men had its own share of flaws, it was just an awesome story with depth and paced really well. Sabertooth was completely tossed aside. I think the major complaint has nothing to do with the Wolverine/Sabertooth Dynamic, they got it right here and both are portrayed awesomely. Its the minor characters that get poured in. really most minor key characters have 1 full scene and then some quick pop up moments.

There is always bound to be continuity problems, but I thought Wolverine has no laughably bad ones. I'll take a good actor over a big guy anyway, and Schrieber is still pretty huge and menacing in this film.

I think the best thing about this film is that Wolverine was very tame in the last film. He is more of a badass in this one then in any other.


In the TV Spots, it shows WOLVERINE standinf face to face with SABERTOOTH and he looks smaller than Jackman in the pic.. How you go from 7 feet tall and menacing to a guy smaller than Jackman is inexcusable.. Why they chose Liev Schrieber over Tyler Mane for continuity sake is weak.. Nevertheless, I'll probably still see it just cause it kicks off the summer.. I think I'm more excited by a 1st pic from IRONMAN 2 than this overall..


Fri May 01, 2009 7:19 pm
Profile WWW
Z
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm
Posts: 7952
Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Reading this thread aches.

_________________
"Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt."
- Arthur Schopenhauer


Fri May 01, 2009 7:23 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
those who believe it's best not to read never produce anything worth reading.


Fri May 01, 2009 7:25 pm
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Make the pain stop! *Grabs adamantium bullets*

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Fri May 01, 2009 8:04 pm
Profile
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Hmm. I think people wanted to hate on this movie from day one just for the sake of it.

I thought it was pure popcorn awesomeness! "ouch that must hurt" was the most common reaction I had throughout the movie. Jackman is badass. This is the first time I actually liked Wolverine. Is it the best movie ever? nope. But it's certainly not crap as some have said here. I think those that can't enjoy this are def film snobs. What exactly were you looking for?

oh. and ryan renolds needs to have his own X men movie. :wub2: :wub2: :wub2:

B+


Sat May 02, 2009 12:41 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Merely ok. The plot is pretty ridiculous, and you pretty much have to shut down your brain and suspend your belief all the way through, otherwise the holes are easily detectable if you start asking questions. The actions are pretty good though, and the pace didn't drag.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Sat May 02, 2009 1:50 am
Profile WWW
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Hugh Jackman certainly gives it his all, but Wolverine is a stagnant, rather joyless experience that feels like an afterthought. Watching this kind of just made me wish I was watching one of the X-Men movies instead. It would be unfair to call this film "inept," since the action sequences are well-done; they just completely lack any sense of excitement. As far as origin stories go, this is not going to down in history as one of the more noteworthy. We already knew a lot about Wolverine just from the X-Men films, and the experiences the character goes through in this film are not particularly interesting. The absolute bright spot of the film is Jackman, who still manages to invest a lot of emotion and actual acting into this character despite some of the putrid, cliched dialogue he has to say. The rest of the cast (Liev Schreiber, Danny Huston, Lynn Collins, Ryan Reynolds) fail to match up to the intensity Jackman brings, although Schreiber isn't that far behind. I will say I was highly confused as to why Ryan Reynolds even agreed to appear in this film, for what must've been about 10 lines of dialogue and one fight sequence near the end that a stunt double probably did more of than him. This movie isn't terrible but it's certainly not particularly good either. C


Sat May 02, 2009 2:40 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Libs wrote:
I will say I was highly confused as to why Ryan Reynolds even agreed to appear in this film, for what must've been about 10 lines of dialogue and one fight sequence near the end that a stunt double probably did more of than him. This movie isn't terrible but it's certainly not particularly good either. C


It wasn't Reynolds at the end whatsoever actually. At all. His character (kinda), but not him playing.

I'm guessing he agreed to appear hoping for a Deadpool spin-off.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat May 02, 2009 8:04 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
For me, WOLVERINE felt like the standard X-MEN flick with action that was actually better than probably X3 and this was leagues better than TDK.. My only 2 gripes were some of the FX looked very much like it was done on a stage setting than in a real environment, particulary with Jackman on the motorcycle and leaping on the helicopter looked kind of cartoonish, but the movie moved along well enough with it not being too much of a distraction and my 2nd gripe which has already been mentioned was the inconsistency with SABERTOOTH running on all 4's vs the Hulking SABERTOOTH in the form of Tyler Mane from the 1st X-MEN.. I sort of wish some kind of explanation would've been provided for such a glaring flaw, but like with any comicbook adaptation, nothing is perfect and even TDK wasn't perfect.. Also, I thought they did a good job introducing the characters and sure, they may not have had the longest screen time like Gambit or even Deadpool, but in the end, these movies are all about showcasing as many mutants as possible within a certain period of running time and you wouldn't have near as much time to give every character their just moments time wise, otherwise, the movie would be like over 2.5 hours and that wasn't necessary.. Overall, I rated it a high "B"


Sat May 02, 2009 8:06 am
Profile WWW
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Recent TV spots and reviews from the leaked version had gotten me to think that this film would truly suck but it actually suprised me. It is in no way a great comic book film but it delivers what it needs to it and does it good enough. Hugh Jackman was likeable again as Wolverine and some of the supporting cast had their moments. Overall, this film would probably rank around X3 in my opinion. B-


Sat May 02, 2009 9:16 am
Profile WWW
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Libs wrote:
I will say I was highly confused as to why Ryan Reynolds even agreed to appear in this film, for what must've been about 10 lines of dialogue and one fight sequence near the end that a stunt double probably did more of than him. This movie isn't terrible but it's certainly not particularly good either. C


It wasn't Reynolds at the end whatsoever actually. At all. His character (kinda), but not him playing.

I'm guessing he agreed to appear hoping for a Deadpool spin-off.


Are you positive? The face is definitely ryan renolds'


Sat May 02, 2009 1:13 pm
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Sam wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Libs wrote:
I will say I was highly confused as to why Ryan Reynolds even agreed to appear in this film, for what must've been about 10 lines of dialogue and one fight sequence near the end that a stunt double probably did more of than him. This movie isn't terrible but it's certainly not particularly good either. C


It wasn't Reynolds at the end whatsoever actually. At all. His character (kinda), but not him playing.

I'm guessing he agreed to appear hoping for a Deadpool spin-off.


Are you positive? The face is definitely ryan renolds'


it was a stunt double the whole time.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0012078/


Sat May 02, 2009 2:25 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21889
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Im sure he had had to film close ups. Reynolds is that ripped so Im sure he was there for all non fighting parts.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Sat May 02, 2009 2:49 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
yeah, it was reynolds non-stunts at the end. his character at the beginning wasnt deadpool, so the credits saying he was confirms it

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat May 02, 2009 8:07 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Solid, but could have been so much more. Parts of this film are terrific, but others, I'm sad to report, range from bland to awful. Pre-release, stories of a troubled production abounded. Studio interference! Superman: The Movie and Lethal Weapon mastermind Richard Donner flown to the set to "lend a hand" (or replace?) director Gavin Hood (Rendition)! You can sense the rumored creative chaos in close to every frame of the final product. This is a busy film long on setpiece-to-setpiece exposition and frenetic action, but short on heart and thought.

The first 30 minutes are the best. The opening credits, following the invincible Logan/Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and his hot-tempered half brother, Victor/Sabretooth (Liev Schreiber), as they come of age and fight without fear of injury or death in various wars, from the Civil War to Vietnam, are elaborate and enthralling. The following scenes, depicting Logan and Victor's experiences in an elite military unit comprised of mutants, are also superb and feature a handful of colorful new characters, including Wade Wilson (Ryan Reynolds), a lightning-fast swordsman, and Bolt (Dominic Monaghan), who has the ability to create and manipulate electricity. Unfortunately, these characters fade once Wolverine becomes disillusioned with his role as a henchman in the military-industrial complex and leaves to lead (of course) a quiet life as a woodsman, the plot switches gears (can Wolverine escape his past and defeat now-rival Sabretooth?), and the film goes downhill.

Though many find themselves playing underdeveloped characters, the stars of this film, for the most part, acquit themselves well. Liev Schreiber shines the brightest, as the conflicted, violent Sabretooth. Schreiber creates a character who is animalistic and intimidating, but never entirely unsympathetic. Throughout the film, I rooted for Sabretooth to find redemption and help his sibling-turned-enemy. I must say, though, and this is no fault of Schreiber's, but there is zero similarity between Sabretooth as featured in the film (authority-hating, calculating) and Sabretooth as played by wrestler-turned-actor Tyler Mane (a big-clawed dumb lug subservient to Magneto) in the first X-Men. I also enjoyed many of the supporting performances, notably Reynolds and Monaghan's, and wish they were given more to do.

As the roguish Gambit, a character whose screen debut fans have long anticipated, Taylor Kitsch is charismatic and cool. However, the writing of Gambit is confused -- one second he's an aloof and confrontational cad, the next he's Wolverine's best friend and helper. It felt as if scenes developing his character were left on the cutting room floor. As the titular superhero himself, Hugh Jackman is solid, but not mind-blowing. His physical dedication to the role is undeniable, but his past turns as Wolerine were deeper and more heartfelt. How strange, Wolverine is a slighter character in the first film dedicated only to him than he was in the ensemble-piece prior films.

Gavin Hood's direction (or should I say co-direction?) is by-the-numbers and forgettable. The action sequences, including an extended chase involving a motorcycle and a helicopter and a climactic three-mutant brawl atop a nuclear reactor, are enormous in scope and exciting, but none are extremely creative or truly memorable. The screenplay, credited to Skip Woods (Hitman) and the talented David Benioff (25th Hour), is mediocre -- there are interesting ideas, but they are rarely developed to full potential and many scenes, including a boxing match between Wolverine and a morbidly obese mutant, fall completely flat and induce more groans than laughs or cheers.

Overall, my feelings on X-Men Origins: Wolverine are mixed. I enjoyed many of the performances and, while nothing earth-shattering, the action sequences are exciting, but the film is also a disappointment and more on par with Brett Ratner's lame X-Men: The Last Stand than either of Bryan Singer's modern classics.

B-

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sat May 02, 2009 9:06 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
It was not Reynolds at the end. At all. I checked it in different sources.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat May 02, 2009 10:46 pm
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
It didn't really look like his eyes under all the makeup. I looked closely, expecting to see a resemblance, but one didn't strike me.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sat May 02, 2009 10:48 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Re: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
It was a solid flick. Not spectacular, but fun. Liev Schreiber made a pretty good Sabertooth, I thought, while will.i.am managed to be the worst actor ever.

I liked all the "story" part of it, while all the action seemed wayyy over-the-top. The final fight is ridiculous. And the special effects seemed really weird throughout, really cheap.

But yeah, it was entertaining. I liked it.

***


Sun May 03, 2009 1:08 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.