| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=83124 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Algren [ Mon Aug 07, 2017 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
  Which will gross more out of these bombs/flops/failures/disappointments - whatever you want to call thems - ? Both opened similarly: Valerian: $17m Atomic Blonde: $18.2m Valerian is currently ahead both domestically and internationally, though it just had a huge theater cut of 1,758 in its 3rd weekend, so Atomic Blonde will catch it domestically soon before probably taking a big theater dive itself. Valerian is at $36m and Atomic Blonde is at $34m. Worldwide, it's $65m and $45m so far. |
|
| Author: | zwackerm [ Mon Aug 07, 2017 12:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
Atomic Blonde will gross more like fucking duh. Even if Valerian out grossed it it wouldn't matter cause Atomic Blondes budget is way smaller. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
I knew the budget thing would come up. This thread isn't about whether each is a flop or a bomb. I'm over that. It is just about which will gross more domestically and globally. I do not think it is obvious which will gross more worldwide, hence the thread. |
|
| Author: | stuffp [ Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
Valerian worldwide will win. Domestically I omitted to vote, but I'd say AB. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Mon Aug 07, 2017 1:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
I went Bomb domestic, Failerian worldwide. But I hope Bomb gets a HUGE theater cut next weekend and fails to make $40m. |
|
| Author: | Jack Sparrow [ Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
Yeah so this is kinda obvious. AB should do better domestically whereas Valerian has the edge in OS markets. |
|
| Author: | Jmart [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
zwackerm wrote: Even if Valerian out grossed it it wouldn't matter cause Atomic Blondes budget is way smaller. Doesn't matter. I forget how, but Valerian was already somehow in the black (at least for the budget concerning the movie and not marketing) before it was released. As for the thread: Blonde by about $10 million domestically and Valerian worldwide. |
|
| Author: | lilmac [ Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: BATTLE OF THE BOMBS - Atomic Bomb vs. Failerian |
I wonder what Luc Besson (with a strong script) would have done with Dark Tower. The flighty look of Valerian could work better with Dark Tower. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|