Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Last-minute box-office question.
Percy Jackson and the Olympians grossed $88.8 million back in 2010, without 3D. Three-and-a-half years later and with 3D- will the sequel make at least $75 million or not?
I'm gonna say less. I see around $65-70 million.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:25 pm |
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Less, considerably.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:25 pm |
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Less!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:27 pm |
|
|
bl1222
Veteran
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:36 pm Posts: 3900
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Hands down, less
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:27 pm |
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
It won't even earn 50 million stateside.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:28 pm |
|
|
DP07
Homo Dperious
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 14480 Location: Everywhere
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
The last one seems to have been relatively well received. I believe the books are still selling well. I give it 75m-80m.
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:43 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
I see around $60m total for this so less.
|
Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:03 pm |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
I think more. I sure hope so. I think it can do 75-80.
|
Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:17 pm |
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18877 Location: San Diego
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
I would be surprised if this does more than 50.
|
Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:37 pm |
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm Posts: 25020 Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
hoping for more
_________________The Force Awakens
|
Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:54 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Same here I want the series to continue and do good.
|
Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:20 pm |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
While 75 Million obviously won't happen now it did hold really well last weekend, dropping just 39.2%. I would think it can continue to have solid holds for a while.
|
Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:22 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
I am just happy that it will now do $50m with a good chance of $55m total. Given the OS performance thus far it could make the required money to warrant a sequel but it will depend how it does in other markets as well.
|
Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:54 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Yeah, $55 million is certain now. Certainly not good, but not the pathetic disaster some expected it to be.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:46 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
You know, while it did gross less than $75 million, as I thought, in a weird way, it kinda still did not terribly bad as some have expected. You know, it was widely regarded as an unnecessary sequel arriving too late and many didn't even see it making $50 million. Could have gone the way of Ghost Rider 2, which dropped 55% from the original. But this one is at $56.5 million after four weeks and there will be no family competition until the end of September, so it could acually wind up with $65 million (off around 27% from its predecessor). Worldwide it will top $200 million easily, maybe even $250 million, if it's lucky. Fox wouldn't be wrong to make another sequel, provided they can be bothered to invest interest in this franchise. I don't think a third film would do worse than the second, if it arrives soon enough.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:39 pm |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Absolutely agreed. 65 Million is respectable, and its worldwide gross could warrant a sequel. I would probably release it over a holiday weekend at the beginning of the year like the first. Maybe President's Day weekend. Or sometime when there's a drought of family films.
|
Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:50 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
I believe both Planes and Mortal Instruments were a healthy combination of competition for Percy and it has been having great legs in face of that competition specially for a sequel. Ofcourse it there was bigger competition the legs wouldn't have been this good but still they are great for this kind of movie. It is actually having better legs than Planes (aside from labor day weekend).
|
Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:01 pm |
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Surprised that it actually handily passed $65 million as well and is now looking at a $68-69 million finish.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:15 pm |
|
|
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 34876 Location: Minnesota
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
Yeah. It has been having really slim declines.
|
Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:56 pm |
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm Posts: 36923
|
Re: Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters - MORE or LESS than $75m?
I wasn't impressed by its OS performance but that was expected 'cause the sequel came in quite late. The domestic performance has been pretty good, the late legs are really good as well. Its going to cross $200m WW on $90m budget. Its not going to loose money but again its not a big money-maker. I am not sure the makers would be interested in another movie, plus the actors might not return back.....aside from contractual obligation.
|
Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:02 pm |
|
|