Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Apr 20, 2024 12:41 am



Reply to topic  [ 3023 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 121  Next
 Production Budgets 
Author Message
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 3129
Post Re: Production Budgets
hasin73 wrote:
...Remember Carolco greenlighted Cutthroat Island and not Crusade. What a crazy mistake ?

And Warner did not approve $150 million for I Am Legend starring Arnie and directed by Ridley Scott !!!



I remember that. I Am Legend with the Ahnuld would have been cool

_________________
I believe in God as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.

I was blind, but now I see.


Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:07 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Production Budgets
For future reference, Saw VII - $17m.


Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:28 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Production Budgets
Nice with SAW series being so popular the opening weekend would itself seal the production cost for the movie.


Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:44 am
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 2388
Location: Poland
Post Re: Production Budgets
That's probably the most expensive SAW movie so far.


Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:03 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Are they gonna have special effects in this? :P

_________________
Image


Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:10 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 2388
Location: Poland
Post Re: Production Budgets
Not many but they will have 3D.


Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:21 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Production Budgets
Nice the usual skulls and swords popping out of the screen along with the victims heads that would be a scene to watch


Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:26 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13041
Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
Post Re: Production Budgets
Shutter Island:

"just under $80 million"

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/enterta ... sland.html

"$75-million"

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/ne ... 6502.story

_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U


Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:21 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Production Budgets
Shutter Island on a normal course should have no problems to cross that budget of 80M


Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:32 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13041
Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
Post Re: Production Budgets
$19m CRAZIES
$37m COP OUT

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-c ... 1743.story

_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U


Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:38 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Production Budgets
Crazies is 25, trust me.


Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:51 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Production Budgets
Cop Out should have hard time getting the money back


Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:40 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
soagg wrote:
Cop Out should have hard time getting the money back


Probably not, no.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:38 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13041
Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
Post Re: Production Budgets
ALICE IN WONDERLAND:
$200m L.A. Times http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/
$250m IMDB

BROOKLYN'S FINEST
$25m IMDB

_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U


Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:44 pm
Profile WWW
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6138
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: Production Budgets
Alice will make that back easily, remember studios get almost all the money from the first weekend. Plus DVD sales will be huge.

_________________
.


Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:59 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Holy shit at Alice. Marketing costs I assume were huge as well (at least 100m+), so it may need to get 600m+ WW just to break even. I was going to call it a huge succuess but I assumed the budget was more around 150m.

Sheesh. Studios really need to learn how to minimize budgets.



It's unfair of you to include the marketing costs into this, but neglect merchandise and tie-ins.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:25 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Holy shit at Alice. Marketing costs I assume were huge as well (at least 100m+), so it may need to get 600m+ WW just to break even. I was going to call it a huge succuess but I assumed the budget was more around 150m.

Sheesh. Studios really need to learn how to minimize budgets.



It's unfair of you to include the marketing costs into this, but neglect merchandise and tie-ins.


Yeah, fine. But even still...a 200m-250m budget does somewhat diminish how big of a success it is. It's going to make back its money and be profitable, but the film still shouldn't have been that big.


Well, you can't expect that with the inflation and rising costs all around for the box-office to get bigger, but not for the bugets. $200 million is the old $150 million, hehe.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:43 pm
Profile WWW
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37152
Location: The Graveyard
Post Re: Production Budgets
$200-$250m isn't that crazy.

Up - $175m, 2012 - $200m, HP6 - $250m, Star Trek - $150m, Monsters Vs Aliens - $175m, A Christmas Carol -$200m.

Budgets have definitely increased quite a bit over the past few years.

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:02 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Dr. Magnus wrote:
It just seems unncessary though. Ticket prices I can somewhat understand cause admissions from 2006-2008 were much lower than the "glory" days.

To me, if Charlie cost 150m, Alice shouldn't have been that much more. But I guess Burton wanted more, Depp wanted more, and they had more bigger actors (even though all of them outside of Depp weren't a draw at all IMO).


Magnus, everything gets more expensive. The props get more expsnive, the effects get more expensive and so on.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:16 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
No, it's not. It's not the only reason, but it is one of the reasons. Others are:

- 3D
- Your reasons

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:23 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:25 pm
Posts: 1222
Post Re: Production Budgets
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Fucking 3D.


Would you cry in the corner if WB announces Batman 3 in 3d?


Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:49 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Batnipplez in 3D PLZ!!!

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:13 am
Profile WWW
The Wall
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
Post Re: Production Budgets
ToyCorpse wrote:
$200-$250m isn't that crazy.

Up - $175m, 2012 - $200m, HP6 - $250m, Star Trek - $150m, Monsters Vs Aliens - $175m, A Christmas Carol -$200m.

Budgets have definitely increased quite a bit over the past few years.

HP6 has a big excuse to have a huge budget like that. The 3 main actors probably get $50 million among themselves. Add to that the all of the constantly returning cast/crew that get bigger and bigger pay bumps and around $100 million goes even before the film starts shooting.

Alice really does have a huge budget. It doesn't look that good either. There were some lame effects.


Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:11 am
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:19 pm
Posts: 2224
Post Re: Production Budgets
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Holy shit at Alice. Marketing costs I assume were huge as well (at least 100m+), so it may need to get 600m+ WW just to break even. I was going to call it a huge succuess but I assumed the budget was more around 150m.

Sheesh. Studios really need to learn how to minimize budgets.

Do you fucking realize how much they made on production ties alone? They made tens of millions even before the movie came out. It's gonna be a huge moneymaker all things considered, and $250 m is more than a fair price for it. We all know WW b/o is just one layer of the business model, and yet we keep talking about breaking even with regard to theatrical grosses, as if it really matters. No, it doesn't. Not anymore.


Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:06 am
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:00 am
Posts: 183
Post Re: Production Budgets
Does Radcliffe + Grint + Watson really equal that much more than Depp + Burton?

I thought I read that converting non-3d films to 3d was only 5M or so? I don't know how much extra it takes to actually film something in 3D.

While I agree 250M is a lot even for franchise films, I felt it was OK in this case considering the talent and the tie-ins involved. But I will say there's been a lot of films greenlit in the past few years with little or no chance of making profit (i.e. Wolfman, etc.); this is particularly true of super high budget horror and sci fi (that's not presold), limited audience aside these films almost always have horrendous legs.


Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:21 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3023 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 121  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.