World of KJ
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=115		 Page 628 of 629
Author:  xiayun [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
I'd rather unsticky Trailer Reactions thread since it doesn't gather enough discussion and is not fully related box office in the first place. I'd in fact move it to Trailers forum instead if there is no objection.
Author:  mark66 [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
No objection, should be part of the crowd reports anyway...

In addition you could put the question in the Archive thread wether to unstick it. If users demand it to stay sticky, let it stay, but my guess is that there will be almost no feedback...

I would rather sticky the INTL thread...
Author:  mark66 [ Sat May 01, 2010 4:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
423 B- ELM
101 C FURRY
Author:  mark66 [ Fri May 07, 2010 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
709 A- IM2
26 B BABIES
Author:  mark66 [ Fri May 07, 2010 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
892 A- IM2
32 B+ BABIES
Author:  mark66 [ Fri May 07, 2010 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
1005 A- IM2
38 B+ BABIES
Author:  mark66 [ Fri May 07, 2010 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
1066 A- IM2
40 B+ BABIES
Author:  mark66 [ Fri May 14, 2010 6:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
132 B Robin
77 A- Juliet
69 B+ Wright
Author:  mark66 [ Fri May 21, 2010 7:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
191 A- SHREK 4
113 B- MACGRUBER
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Fri May 21, 2010 9:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Shrek 4 has only 221 reviews right now - averaging just 15 each of the last two hours. Even if it hits 300 reviews tonight (which I doubt), it would need a ratio of 15 just to reach a $20m Friday.
Author:  Rev [ Fri May 21, 2010 10:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
AAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! :grrr:
Author:  Barrabás [ Fri May 21, 2010 11:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
There is no way it does sub 20m OW. It would be hilarious though.
Author:  zingy [ Fri May 21, 2010 11:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Waker of Winds wrote:
There is no way it does sub 20m OW. It would be hilarious though.


He's talking about opening day.
Author:  Barrabás [ Fri May 21, 2010 11:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
I meant OD.
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Thu May 27, 2010 7:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Sex & The City 2 has 152 reviews at this hour with a grade of C+.
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Thu May 27, 2010 10:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
We're at 181 reviews right now. I project 240 or so at the current pace. I don't see a ratio of 10 for SATC2, so I'm thinking about $20m for Thursday.
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Fri May 28, 2010 3:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
It's a shame Yahoo is no longer useful - it used to be a lot of fun. Thought I'd take one final stab at it last night, but it's obviously curtains for our old friend. We sure impressed a lot of people with (generally) accurate projections over the years, so as I bid farewell to Yahoo Review tracking, I extend a special thanks to xiayun, Horlicks, DP07, Zing, and the countless others who kept extensive records, provided insight, and offered their time with hourly updates. We built something from the ground up that we should all be proud of.

So long, Yahoo - it's been a blast. :shades:
Author:  Proud Ryu [ Fri May 28, 2010 4:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Is Yahoo tracking something that possibly has merely trended, or is it 100% useless? I didn't become interested until about the time people started saying it was useless, so I didn't bother. If it's completely useless, is it because of people flocking to twitter/facebook/other now instead?
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Fri May 28, 2010 6:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Proud Ryu wrote:
Is Yahoo tracking something that possibly has merely trended, or is it 100% useless? I didn't become interested until about the time people started saying it was useless, so I didn't bother. If it's completely useless, is it because of people flocking to twitter/facebook/other now instead?


The ratios are so inconsistent that reliable tracking just isn't possible anymore. It seems the number of users on Yahoo has dwindled the last couple of years. As to where they've gone is anyone's guess, but the rapid growth of social networking sites is a viable explanation.
Author:  mark66 [ Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
146 A- A-TEAM
93 B- KARATE KID
Author:  _axiom [ Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Huh. Considering what people expected (and taking into account that Sony's supposedly through the roof positive testing for TKK) I expected the situation to be reversed. We'll see how the grades will change after more reviews are added, but I like things just as fine now. :sweat:
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Yahoo reviews are dead, guys. The numbers don't mean anything anymore.
Author:  mark66 [ Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
It's not about the numbers, it's about WOM...
Author:  Rolling Thunder [ Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
mark66 wrote:
It's not about the numbers, it's about WOM...


Yeah, the grades are still somewhat helpful, but usually not for OW.
Author:  Jack Sparrow [ Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Yahoo Review Thread - 2010
Not really sure how others might thing but I saw both and would have given A-Team better rating than TKK. I think TKK is better than B- somewhere around B+ or A- though A-Team I would have definitely given A.
Page 628 of 629 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/