Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 7:50 am



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 222 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 Minneapolis Burning 
Author Message
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Chippy wrote:
Excel wrote:
By far the best analogy of Black Lives Matter that I have heard is Breast Cancer Awareness month. One does not run up to people wearing pink during Breast Cancer Awareness and yell "BUT WHAT ABOUT PANCREATIC CANCER!?". Of course white, latino, asian etc lives all matters too. BLM isn't putting any others down, it is bringing attention to one specific issue.

What BLM truly lacks, and it does undermine their cause, is some sort fo real, clear, digestible statistic. For example, if in 2021, only 1 black person would be killed by police in all of the USA, do we riot our do we say "whoa, that is a big improvement!"? All of these black people saying they are being profiled when they get pulled over by cops - how do we distinguish between those who actually should have been pulled over vs. those were 'driving while black'?

Everything it seems agrees with the direction they want things to go, but there needs to be some sort of real, honest metric for measuring progress. It also should exist for white people too for comparisons sake and for monitoring police behavior.


I mean, they kind of have this. Just look at the prison population. The minor drug charges, etc etc.

Black/Hispanic males account for almost 60% of the prison population.


Prison population is backwards looking. How would everybody be able to know we make progress in the 2nd half of 2020?

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:01 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Release all minor drug offenders in prison.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:02 am
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37974
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Excel wrote:
What BLM truly lacks, and it does undermine their cause, is some sort fo real, clear, digestible statistic. For example, if in 2021, only 1 black person would be killed by police in all of the USA, do we riot our do we say "whoa, that is a big improvement!"? All of these black people saying they are being profiled when they get pulled over by cops - how do we distinguish between those who actually should have been pulled over vs. those were 'driving while black'?

Everything it seems agrees with the direction they want things to go, but there needs to be some sort of real, honest metric for measuring progress. It also should exist for white people too for comparisons sake and for monitoring police behavior.


The problem with the stats idea is if you went by them BLM wouldn’t exist. Or the stats used are clearly flawed ones like using total white and black deaths by police officers without taking into account that crime rate is higher in the black community. You have a higher chance of dying if you’re arrested for violent crime if you’re white than you are if you’re black, and a higher % of white people killed by cops are unarmed than black, which doesn’t make very much sense if the majority of white cops are racist. I believe the % of dying while under arrest if you’re black is higher, but for example white people get arrested for DUIs way more than black people where you’re not as in danger from cops, so this affects the numbers somewhat. Stats would also bring up some things people don’t want to hear such as that black people kill white people more than white people kill black people, and black people killing each other is by far a bigger problem than being killed by white people.

An article today about the subject https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-o ... 1591119883

Apologies to the emotionally charged for posting some inconvenient truths.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:22 am
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Chippy wrote:
Release all minor drug offenders in prison.


What would that do for police brutality etc?

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:23 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Shack wrote:
Apologies to the emotionally charged for posting some inconvenient truths.


You truly are a piece of shit. Like, honestly. Shut the site down. I'm so fucking sick of you.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jun 03, 2020 11:32 am
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28292
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
People that go around replying to "Black Lives Matter" posts on social media with "ALL LIVES MATTER" can't possibly be that fucking stupid, can they? I see this everywhere and I don't get where it's coming from. I'm assuming right-wing personalities are behind it.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:12 pm
Profile
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5705
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Excel wrote:
By far the best analogy of Black Lives Matter that I have heard is Breast Cancer Awareness month. One does not run up to people wearing pink during Breast Cancer Awareness and yell "BUT WHAT ABOUT PANCREATIC CANCER!?". Of course white, latino, asian etc lives all matters too. BLM isn't putting any others down, it is bringing attention to one specific issue.


For your health example, I actually think it's ok if someone does say that about that cancer, and other types of cancers; it doesn't diminish breast cancer, but also bring awareness to other types as well.

Specifically, I feel like the cancer analogy applies relevantly to Covid-19 situation. A lot of women do regular check up for breast cancer, but ignore other type of cancer risks. So people have been solely focused on Covid-19 that they are ignoring the dangers of other health conditions. They're afraid to go get important medical exams to check for other health issues; or the medical facility is closed/not allowing any elective procedures, or the hospital was overwhelmed with patients and couldn't adequately provide care to non-covid-19 patients. So people have been dying without getting covid-19, but those deaths are indirectly caused by the covid-19 pandemic.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:16 pm
Profile WWW
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5705
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Shack wrote:
Excel wrote:
What BLM truly lacks, and it does undermine their cause, is some sort fo real, clear, digestible statistic. For example, if in 2021, only 1 black person would be killed by police in all of the USA, do we riot our do we say "whoa, that is a big improvement!"? All of these black people saying they are being profiled when they get pulled over by cops - how do we distinguish between those who actually should have been pulled over vs. those were 'driving while black'?

Everything it seems agrees with the direction they want things to go, but there needs to be some sort of real, honest metric for measuring progress. It also should exist for white people too for comparisons sake and for monitoring police behavior.


The problem with the stats idea is if you went by them BLM wouldn’t exist. Or the stats used are clearly flawed ones like using total white and black deaths by police officers without taking into account that crime rate is higher in the black community. You have a higher chance of dying if you’re arrested for violent crime if you’re white than you are if you’re black, and a higher % of white people killed by cops are unarmed than black, which doesn’t make very much sense if the majority of white cops are racist. I believe the % of dying while under arrest if you’re black is higher, but for example white people get arrested for DUIs way more than black people where you’re not as in danger from cops, so this affects the numbers somewhat. Stats would also bring up some things people don’t want to hear such as that black people kill white people more than white people kill black people, and black people killing each other is by far a bigger problem than being killed by white people.

An article today about the subject https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-o ... 1591119883

Apologies to the emotionally charged for posting some inconvenient truths.


Site is behind paywall. Those statistics sound interesting, I'd be curious to read more about it.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:18 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
The problem with Shack's point is that it is largely true. The big, fat problem with American voters is how fucking stupid some of them have become. Then throw another a faction that is both stupid and without morals?

Floyd's death and other issues are absolutely a moral issue. It is nuts that some use it as means to live in an alternate reality where "things are no better than 1921". Right...

I know some do not like, BUT...if you really care about seeing less Black people die. if you really care about police reform...go into the issue with your eyes wide open. The statistics say what they say. It is what it is.

Chippy wrote:
Shack wrote:
Apologies to the emotionally charged for posting some inconvenient truths.


You truly are a piece of shit. Like, honestly. Shut the site down. I'm so fucking sick of you.


Thank you for proving his point? Is this how you react any time anyone of a different opinion presents an alternative perspective? Yet these people call others ignorant and closed minded. Ridiculous. Even if one doesn't agree with Shack, this is a nonsensical response.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:40 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 1830
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
I read from my local newspaper here in Finland, quoting from memory, that blacks make up roughly 12% of USA population, yet commit roughly 50% of violent crime. Sorry if the numbers are somewhat incorrect, I didn't google and check them.

That doesn't excuse racism or police brutality, but is likely one factor to why policemen tend to be more suspicious of black people, which manifests in many ways.

For example, if a middle-aged black man wears a suit and drives a BMW, is he likely to get stopped by police? Probably not. The same with a black woman with two kids on the backseat.

But a young black man / men who all do their best to imitate gangsters, even when they are not? A different story.

I'm sure that racism plays a part in the fact that black drivers are stopped more often. But most likely there are other factors as well, and trying to pretend that the other factors don't exist or don't mean anything is a disservice for everyone. Including black people.

Change won't be permanent, and it won't be good, if it's based on distortion of truth.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 2:59 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 1830
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Also I read from a newspaper a rather big article about a young, middle-class, American black guy who was taking part in the riots. The story was supportive of him.

What hit me was the way he thought of King Jr. He essentially said that King played it nice, and got killed for it. He and his friends are not going to play it nice.

I couldn't help thinking that the guy considers King Jr. a pussy, and looks down on him. He seemingly didn't have any kind of real context of what King did for equality of race in USA.

Not sure if his attitude was that healthy. Maybe modern people in USA think King Jr. was a loser? He is pretty respected here in Finland.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:10 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Magnus wrote:
Heather Macdonald and other conservatives love to cite Fryers research in terms of shootings and completely ignore that his research that states that there is a clear bias that shows that black people are more likely to experience non-lethal excessive force (and this applies to cases in which they are complaint and non compliant) and this has a significant effect on individuals psyche. It’s easy to say there’s no issue when you ignore the majority of cases where bias and discrimination occurs.

If you want to get mad at media creating a perception that black get shot by cops 10x more than whites, fine. Make it about the media then. But don’t play the stupid racist intellectual who thinks they have proof that there is no bias because they used their bias to ignore all the data telling them they’re wrong.

This also doesn’t even get into the idea that most agree that Fryers research has a fundamental problem of relying on data from logs that in itself can be distorted from bias. So the fact that he even found bias without finding assurance that the data was clean should be pretty problematic.


The only way to do this is get leaders from both sides to agree a set of goals, criteria & a measuring process and basically start from scratch. Looking backwards is extremely murky for the reason several people have noted. It would a wonderful goal for any President to take up & frankly, would be a crowning achievement if it were actually accomplished.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:21 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11006
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
I think a major problem with the idea of working together to find a solution is the current president’s political identity revolves around being the antithesis to the Obama Era. He was voted in large part as a reaction to that era and Obama as a political figure. Without that identity, Trump has little fire in his base. Frankly he needs division to exist to win the election. He is strongest when his base is angry with an enemy.

If Biden was smart he’d center his campaign around unity, which it seems like that is the direction he is going with his “unite” tag on his slogans. Problem is the Progressive branch of his party does not want unity, but rather actual changes. This is why I still see Trump winning the election. The progress love base will again not show up to vote. Trump will continue his hate monger platform to keep his base motivated again the “other” boogeyman. He just needs to hope the economy doesn’t tank.

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 03, 2020 5:57 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11006
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Magnus!

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 03, 2020 6:58 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11006
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
At least the political situation we’re in has us talking

_________________
Image


Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:31 pm
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21880
Location: Places
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Remember the election is decided by 10% of voters in a handful of states.

Relative to win in 2020, Bernie Sanders HAD to expand on his base. The enthusiasm was always going to be more muted in round 2. He couldn't. He regressed. He didn't move closer to the party, he rebuffed it. In return, he turned people off and could not grow his support. I suspect Trump is going experience this dynamic on a more severe scale. He hasn't proven anybody wrong, and life with him on TV every day has proven to be simply exhausting.

Any erosion of support from 2016 standing will be disastrous for Trump because he won by razor thin margins. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin were all by less than 1%, Florida was by 1.2%. He is down in all 4 now. States with larger margins of victory, such as Arizona, Ohio, Texas, North Carolina now lean Biden or are toss ups at worst. Trump's efforts to sabotage Biden's reputation as he did Clinton have proven far less effective. Biden is more well known and likable while Trump's style is obviously having diminishing returns.

Biden certainly is not a lock to win, and the last thing Democrats should do is get over confident. Democrats would be well served to keep buying into this notion that Trump is invincible in order to maximize turn out. But every bit of logic and reason says Trump sits in a highly, highly vulnerable position.

Winning reelection was always gong to depend on his performance as his personality does not endear himself to people than W or o did. With the results as shitty as they are 5 months from Election Day...

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:03 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 1830
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Magnus wrote:
Tuukka wrote:
For example, if a middle-aged black man wears a suit and drives a BMW, is he likely to get stopped by police? Probably not. The same with a black woman with two kids on the backseat.
.


He actually is more likely to get pulled over than whites, particularly whites in the same economic class.

https://www.aclu-il.org/en/publications ... iew-mirror


Yes, I stated that his unlikely to be stopped in general, but I acknowledge that he is more likely to be stopped than whites, especially whites with the same suit, and same car.

Good that there is some research on the subject.


Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:32 am
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Magnus wrote:
Excel wrote:
Magnus wrote:
GWB is still the worst president of our lifetime though Trump is catching up to him very quick.


Comments like this are not helpful. The while "GWB is still a war criminal blah blah blah". Nobody is saying he isn't. Refusing to recognize or accept an individuals improvement is not a good trait for society. Do we not wish Trump would change? Do we now wish W would have change during his Presidency?

Yes, some things are unforgivable, but anyone thinking society benefits by defining everyone only by their mistakes will find themselves with virtually no supporters. The faction of the Democrats who exist merely to point out peoples imperfection - and rarely offer any sort of constructive, substantive dialogue - are part of why W and Trump won in the first place.

Bush's statement is great. It is powerful given his previous positions. If he endorses Biden, that would truly send a message. Donald Trump won by tiny margins. Anything that helps Biden with moderates/independents, which a Bush endorsement certainly would, should be welcomed.

Like Sanders in the 2020 primaries, Trump almost certainly needs to expand his voter base to retain office. It seems he is going in the opposite direction.



Bush ruined the economy, the federal budget, education, disaster response, individual privacy/freedom, and of course the War on Terror whose impact in some ways affects everything we know because of how much of a fuck up it was.

I’m not going to stop forgetting that and moving on. It is vital for us to remember what he did and make sure to learn from it and never accept it as okay.


Well look at it this way, it took 8 years for Bush to fuck things up. It took Orange Mussolini only 3 years to get to the point we are at and he would have done a lot more damage if he was not under surveillance under watchdog groups. 4 more years of Trump will bring more uncertainty and will probably pull us into more escalation with China and Iran and maybe war with either of those two


Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:01 pm
Profile
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37152
Location: The Graveyard
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning


...how many walked by this old man?? :mad:

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Thu Jun 04, 2020 11:39 pm
Profile WWW
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37152
Location: The Graveyard
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:50 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36923
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Seriously wtf is going on there?


Fri Jun 05, 2020 2:23 am
Profile
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
The "couple bad apple" cops argument some people like to lean into is certainly made difficult by video after video of many police all over the nation living up to their garbage reputation. You've really got to be a special kind of dense to respond to people protesting police brutality with police brutality and then wonder why civilians have problems with your hive mind club of thugs :thumbsup:


Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:23 am
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
"Of course, there are those self-justifying white people who are taking to Twitter to “Well, actually” MLK’s children themselves about what it is their father really meant. Which is peak whiteness. Just quintessential, talcum powder, confectioners’-sugar-on-a-vanilla-cupcake whiteness, especially when you’re a smirking little bigot writing for a laughably racist right-wing “news site,” telling the accomplished activist daughter of a man whose actual goals and black skin you actively hate that her dad would totally be on his side in his site’s whole white victimhood fantasy narrative."

https://news.avclub.com/dr-bernice-king ... 1843918344

In my article wandering on the internet I keep coming across things like this and I can't help it--this kind of crap is idiotic and not helpful. Simply being white in and of itself is a negative on keel with "whitesplaining" racists? How? If I were to say "Which is peak blackness. Just quintessential, dark chocolate, extra cocoa fudge-on-a-devil's-food-cake blackness" in regards to how *some* black people were behaving in various videos/clips/whathaveyou I'd quite speedily be called out for the rather racist, dipshit thing I said--but if it's white people well then have at it because they're all the same :thumbsup:

Also, isn't "whitesplaining" just being condescending/patronizing while white? Any race/gender/orientation is capable of exhibiting that so if we're going to incorporate everyone's race/gender/who knows what else then is it necessary to say "Chineseplaining" and "Womansplaining" or are these things only whites/men are capable of demonstrating? I've had *many* conversations where some straight guy/gal did their best to explain why "faggot" isn't that offensive, what's the big deal if you call it a "civil union" instead of "marriage," how "that's so gay!" doesn't mean anything negative and I shouldn't take it personally, etc so should "straightsplaining" be thrown about as well?


Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:11 am
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 1796
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Malcolm wrote:
"Of course, there are those self-justifying white people who are taking to Twitter to “Well, actually” MLK’s children themselves about what it is their father really meant. Which is peak whiteness. Just quintessential, talcum powder, confectioners’-sugar-on-a-vanilla-cupcake whiteness, especially when you’re a smirking little bigot writing for a laughably racist right-wing “news site,” telling the accomplished activist daughter of a man whose actual goals and black skin you actively hate that her dad would totally be on his side in his site’s whole white victimhood fantasy narrative."

https://news.avclub.com/dr-bernice-king ... 1843918344

In my article wandering on the internet I keep coming across things like this and I can't help it--this kind of crap is idiotic and not helpful. Simply being white in and of itself is a negative on keel with "whitesplaining" racists? How? If I were to say "Which is peak blackness. Just quintessential, dark chocolate, extra cocoa fudge-on-a-devil's-food-cake blackness" in regards to how *some* black people were behaving in various videos/clips/whathaveyou I'd quite speedily be called out for the rather racist, dipshit thing I said--but if it's white people well then have at it because they're all the same :thumbsup:

Also, isn't "whitesplaining" just being condescending/patronizing while white? Any race/gender/orientation is capable of exhibiting that so if we're going to incorporate everyone's race/gender/who knows what else then is it necessary to say "Chineseplaining" and "Womansplaining" or are these things only whites/men are capable of demonstrating? I've had *many* conversations where some straight guy/gal did their best to explain why "faggot" isn't that offensive, what's the big deal if you call it a "civil union" instead of "marriage," how "that's so gay!" doesn't mean anything negative and I shouldn't take it personally, etc so should "straightsplaining" be thrown about as well?


isn't "whitesplaining" just being condescending/patronizing while white?
Yes, it is. And theoretically you "could" use any of the other 'splaining'-terms you proffered. The difference is in the CLEAR direction of power flow. White skin unquestionably confers far greater power, influence, benefit-of-the-doubt, weight, and privilege than black/brown skin. Same as being a cis-man, which is why "man-splaining" is a thing. Same as why you can definitely be prejudiced and discriminatory against white people, but you can't be racist towards white people. It's just not a thing, it's going against the deeply ingrained flow of power for the centuries on centuries on centuries that have informed our behavior, our social constructs, our consciousnesses.

I am white, I am racist. I've wrestled with shame and guilt about it. I've recognized I have it easier on a moment to moment basis existing in this world. (I'm also a cis-man, and "straight-passing" gay, quite privileged).

Being white, the quality of having this color skin in this society, has made me more powerful than otherwise. Whiteness has always been the ideal, the measure against which all others are judged. When I see a group of Mexican teenagers hanging around on my street, I'm a little more nervous. If I come across a couple of black people on the path, I am more nervous than I would be if I were coming upon a white couple. These are just facts, they're ingrained in my nervous system from the very specific and generalized cultural milieu we've all been swimming in, soaking in. The fish knows not the quality of the water in which its entire existence depends until truly immersed in something other-than. I wonder what happens if we touch our own racism (it's in EVERYONE), and if you're white, just imagine, maybe deeply imagine, dropping concepts and preconceived notions.... What if you were black??? Imagine moving through this world in dark, black skin. Imagine stepping out your door into the world, taking a walk, driving to the store.... Everything would probably be heightened, ever on the slightly-more-defensive edge.

I think you, Malcolm, might be able to relate to this experience as a gay man. And hearing about the straight people you've interacted / conversed with makes me exhausted, angry, resigned, very frustrated.... Ugh. ANYTHING experienced as offensive or hurtful from the perspective of a less-empowered social group, should by definition be considered harmful, hurtful. FULL STOP.

(imagining the pushback): FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!! POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS LIBPUSSY BULLSHIT!!! Great, yeah, go ahead and say whatever you want ever without regard to how it affects people, that's your right, great job, clearly your house is all in order and your relationships are surely rewarding and intimate and genuine and you feel welcome and safe in the world.

And if a black person directly related to literally THE most impactful Human Rights Leader this nation has ever known throws out the label of "the epitome of whiteness" to describe a white person in direct misalignment to MLK's values as "whitesplaining," it's okay to feel a little defensive, because that's the result of growing up in a white society as a white person, you're gonna get defensive at some point when "whiteness" is called out as being an overall negative, oppressive impact on society (in a racially relevancy kind of way, not saying "white people are all bad or have never contributed anything at all," AT ALL!!!!!) Context is crucial, in this, and everything.

Love to all y'all random internet strangers who I don't know at all except for your posts on this movie forum, for me a relic of being passionate about movies and box office grosses circa 2002-2010.

_________________
how am I not myself?


Sat Jun 06, 2020 2:50 am
Profile
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6138
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: Minneapolis Burning
Prediction: America as we have known it is going to cease to exist by 2021. Either a break up into multiple states, total anarchy, or the Democrat/Republican democratic system will be replaced by something else.

_________________
.


Sat Jun 06, 2020 3:24 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 222 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.