World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
robocop http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=74937 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Jiffy [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
Welp, you can't say this thread didn't deliver on the title. |
Author: | Algren [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 4:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
I really enjoyed this thread. This should happen more often. The design of the 80s Robocop is really awesome. Those pictures in the first post are nice. |
Author: | Libs [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 8:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
This thread doesn't feel complete until trixster posts in it. |
Author: | trixster [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
![]() |
Author: | Price [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
![]() |
Author: | Algren [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
This thread soon went downhill. |
Author: | Mister Ecks [ Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
I'm officially calling it: this thread is roboTOPS. New server, same X. |
Author: | Algren [ Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: trixster |
Now it's the worst thread ever. |
Author: | trixster [ Sun Jul 13, 2014 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: trixster |
![]() |
Author: | Chippy [ Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: trixster |
The original robocop is a really badly designed robot. |
Author: | Price [ Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
![]() |
Author: | Algren [ Tue Jul 22, 2014 11:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
The last two images are great. |
Author: | Thegun [ Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
Author: | Crux [ Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
![]() |
Author: | Algren [ Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
![]() |
Author: | Chippy [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
hehe |
Author: | Algren [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
"I'm glad I trust, Batman" kind of makes no sense. If it was "I'm glad I trust Batman" whispered under his breath, then it makes sense. Or "I trust you, Batman". But the way it currently is makes no sense, even for Robocop. |
Author: | Chippy [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
You're going to complain about a missplaced comma? |
Author: | Algren [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
If it was a forum post, I would not, but this is a project that someone (probably two people) worked on, and if they make these mistakes, and I notice them, it ruins it for me. Punch lines need to be perfect to work. |
Author: | Shack [ Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
Algren wrote: "I'm glad I trust, Batman" kind of makes no sense. If it was "I'm glad I trust Batman" whispered under his breath, then it makes sense. Or "I trust you, Batman". But the way it currently is makes no sense, even for Robocop. I read it as him telling Batman that in general, he's glad he trusts people (or is saying it sarcastically). So it makes sense to me. I don't know anything about Robocop though and if there's more context to the joke |
Author: | Algren [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
Shack wrote: Algren wrote: "I'm glad I trust, Batman" kind of makes no sense. If it was "I'm glad I trust Batman" whispered under his breath, then it makes sense. Or "I trust you, Batman". But the way it currently is makes no sense, even for Robocop. I read it as him telling Batman that in general, he's glad he trusts people (or is saying it sarcastically). So it makes sense to me. I don't know anything about Robocop though and if there's more context to the joke There is that way of reading it, sure. But to avoid confusion, don't mention Batman. It's stupid. |
Author: | trixster [ Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: robocop |
robocop |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |