| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| can we just take a second... http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=70658 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | jmovies [ Sat May 25, 2013 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
indeed |
|
| Author: | movies35 [ Sat May 25, 2013 12:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Meh. I know I'm not sexually attracted to chicks or anything but I definitely know when one is attractive/hot/whatever and... eh. |
|
| Author: | Mau [ Sat May 25, 2013 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
You have Channing Tatum in your avatar yer opinion is invalid |
|
| Author: | BJ [ Sat May 25, 2013 5:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Mau wrote: You have Channing Tatum in your avatar yer opinion is invalid This |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Sat May 25, 2013 7:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
She reminds me of Keira. Name? |
|
| Author: | Darth Indiana Bond [ Sat May 25, 2013 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Meh, not a fan of blondes, and she seems like nothing special, too dolled up. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Sun May 26, 2013 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
She looks fine in one shot. She's actually pretty ugly in other images. Far too thin, and her face is just so plain and lifeless. Give me a 50 year-old Jennifer Aniston any day of the week. More fun and she actually has curves to be sexy with. |
|
| Author: | zingy [ Sun May 26, 2013 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
I'd hit that. |
|
| Author: | matatonio [ Sun May 26, 2013 8:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Models are indeed awesome... but not the one thats on your avatar, ive seen far better. |
|
| Author: | Jmart [ Sun May 26, 2013 9:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Algren wrote: She looks fine in one shot. She's actually pretty ugly in other images. Far too thin, and her face is just so plain and lifeless. Give me a 50 year-old Jennifer Aniston any day of the week. More fun and she actually has curves to be sexy with. I agree? |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Mon May 27, 2013 12:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Jmart wrote: Algren wrote: She looks fine in one shot. She's actually pretty ugly in other images. Far too thin, and her face is just so plain and lifeless. Give me a 50 year-old Jennifer Aniston any day of the week. More fun and she actually has curves to be sexy with. I agree? Fuckin'ay you do! |
|
| Author: | Riggs [ Fri May 31, 2013 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Not a fan. My avatar is ten times more beautiful. |
|
| Author: | Thegun [ Fri May 31, 2013 2:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
I heard Knightley is getting muscle and skin implants in the near future. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Fri May 31, 2013 8:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
Thegun wrote: I heard Knightley is getting muscle and skin implants in the near future. Really? Ha. The lengths that people will go to in order to stay relevant. |
|
| Author: | Barrabás [ Sun Jun 02, 2013 6:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
She looks like she has small boobs |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Mon Jun 03, 2013 1:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: can we just take a second... |
This is a great example of how being beautiful doesn't always mean sexually attractive. While she is clearly beautiful, her face isn't sexually attractive whatsoever. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|