Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 9:05 am



Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
 Just to be clear... 
Author Message
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post Just to be clear...
i haven't sifted thru all of the comments on the BO forum, but do people 'get' WB's choice to not release box-office figures? i think some do, but sometimes i wonder...

it's not out of sensitivity to the victims. it's out of sensitivity to the company. the company doesn't want the figures being released only to be misconstrued in the context of the tragedy

WB doesn't have to release figures. we love the figures as a unique opportunity to track corporate products vis-a-vis corporate profits in real-time. but WB's stakeholders don't care, at least for now. markets don't react to box-office figures (other than LGF, but they're not a big studio). theatres won't freeze purchases of WB's reels. and other film investors have no immediate leverage to walk away from whatever deals they walked into. long-term, this event could adjust expectations across the industry, but the industry is navigating the situation on the fly

the public generally doesn't care about figures, either... in this case, they might if prompted. consider the forecast on Fri morning -- and consider the forthcoming headlines without intervention. "WB makes boatload of cash amidst tragedy." in an OWS-fueled world, these reports damage WB as a socially-responsible company. they'd create demand for automatic profit-sharing with the victims (as some have said it should do anyway) and would require WB to 'clear up' the allegations with more disclosure around film profits (which has its own drawbacks). doesn't matter if the number is $150m or $200m

besides, WB can't count on the media to interpret and report box-office figures correctly. box-office figures are 'filler' items on media (radio, tv, newspapers, mags) and they're not overly analyzed against costs, potential, or tracking. nor should they be -- there isn't widespread public interest

(i think the above is more of a 'water cooler' topic on a box office-geared forum. so pls don't move me)


Last edited by torrino on Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:47 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Just to be clear...
Yes, you're correct.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:52 pm
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post Re: Just to be clear...
obama actually put it best....the focus should just be on the victims, nothing else. not the movie, not the gross, and CERTAINLY not the shooter.

the victims & their families deserve all the attention.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:39 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Just to be clear...
yup had nothing to do with the movie, ignore any and all parallels
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Image


Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:01 am
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post Re: Just to be clear...
yuck


Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:55 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.