are you the best thing left here?
if so, I will stick around. just for you.
| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| tonymontana http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53965 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | Michael A [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | tonymontana |
are you the best thing left here? if so, I will stick around. just for you.
|
|
| Author: | Corpse [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
What's with the "is that all that's left here?", "are they the only ones left here?" garbage? Who cares if a couple posters left recently? Who needs them exactly? Maybe move on and stop referencing it? Clearly the forum is changing a bit, and those who keep complaining should just deal with it. No big deal. |
|
| Author: | Riggs [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Yup, all this "KJ went down the toilet" talk is really annoying. If you don't like it here then please, just leave. It isn't that hard. |
|
| Author: | Price [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
I think KJ went down the toilet on December 27th, 2008. |
|
| Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
John Savage wrote: are you the best thing left here? if so, I will stick around. just for you. Savage, Montana isn't anywhere near the best.. He's great and all, but at the end of the day, you simply suck hard and bring absolutely jack squat to this site except bitch about me and follow me post to post.. Instead of being so judgemental of the site, how about focusing on the quality of your threads and actually post 1 once in awhile that's worth discussing??? 
|
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Price wrote: I think KJ went down the toilet on December 27th, 2008. FINALLY! |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
I think what they're trying to do, by saying stupid shit like "You're the bestestestestest person left here, come to <their stupid ass forum name>!" is they are simply trying to make it seem like KJ is on its last leg and Torri Anus' forum is the future, when really, KJ has moved on. No one but his butt buddies seem to care that Torri Anus has left. |
|
| Author: | Corpse [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Well, it can't be the "future" with leftovers and quitters. And then it's just a clone of other forums, so it's going to fail right there, or at least keep it from growing. Nothing new to attract anyone outside posters from the forum they all came from. So they are all doing it wrong in every way possible. Someone needs to learn SEO. I doubt any are capable of doing it effectively though. |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
したい wrote: Well, it can't be the "future" with leftovers and quitters. And then it's just a clone of other forums, so it's going to fail right there, or at least keep it from growing. Nothing new to attract anyone outside posters from the forum they all came from. So they are all doing it wrong in every way possible. Someone needs to learn SEO. I doubt any are capable of doing it effectively though. Apparently there's a merge happening with Filmgasm so I wouldn't say that's totally true. Anyway, my plan is to post at both places. I won't be in The Water Cooler much at all, though. |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
lawl, sad. They have to merge with another forum to have a userbase that's not full of angry, bitter people. |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Korrgan wrote: lawl, sad. They have to merge with another forum to have a userbase that's not full of angry, bitter people. It's not all angry and bitter...ideally, like I said, I'd like to post at both places and think KJ and this new forum can coexist without nastiness. |
|
| Author: | Corpse [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Libs wrote: したい wrote: Well, it can't be the "future" with leftovers and quitters. And then it's just a clone of other forums, so it's going to fail right there, or at least keep it from growing. Nothing new to attract anyone outside posters from the forum they all came from. So they are all doing it wrong in every way possible. Someone needs to learn SEO. I doubt any are capable of doing it effectively though. Apparently there's a merge happening with Filmgasm so I wouldn't say that's totally true. Anyway, my plan is to post at both places. I won't be in The Water Cooler much at all, though. Yeah, I knw about the merge. But that's only adding more members who all came from the same place. It'll increase forum activity, but it's still just a clone which can't exactly grow. Is the goal to be a copycat more or less or to provide content not found on mirror forums and grow? A merge with a mirror forum to increase it's members isn't exactly doing anything. If a slightly bigger forum userbase is what everyone wants though, that's cool. I think filmgasm has around 30 or so regulars, so it'll increase the current activity. And make sure those doing the merge back up the database before they begin. And one huge problem people run into when merging forums is that each forum must have the same modifications. So, you'll have to either install all the mods that one forum has, but not the other, or delete all of the mods all together or you'll keep getting errors when merging. . |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Libs wrote: Korrgan wrote: lawl, sad. They have to merge with another forum to have a userbase that's not full of angry, bitter people. It's not all angry and bitter...ideally, like I said, I'd like to post at both places and think KJ and this new forum can coexist without nastiness. There are enough angry and bitter people there, and that's all that matters. I can't see a merge working out, either. That sounds like a disaster just waiting to happen. I understand where loyal is coming from, and I don't blame him one bit, but the human resources he's using have too many cancers in them. I left that forum quickly when I saw it was the same nasty negative energy coming from people who have done nothing but spread that kind of love here and elsewhere. People can say they'll be friendly and open to newcomers, but when it contradicts years of how they've actually been, just coming for their own cliques and not being bothered with anything else, that doesn't go far. I mean, jujubee is a mod? Didn't her horrible job here as a mod, and her nasty disposition toward several people, show people the light? I can see many problems with that on the horizon. Torrino's tact will be the least of the problems!  Is loyal going to rely on mainsite content to draw people to the forum? I'm sure loyal will treat his contributers better than this place did, but that's not going to get it done. For one, consistensy from contributers won't happen free of charge. If loyal is listening out there, I'm going to give him some smart advice if he really wants success. Look around at the successful movie forums, and what do they ALL have in common? It's not articles and opinions and analysis, it's a DATABASE. Find your niche in that department, and it won't matter how many poison pills you have running around the forum, you'll always be able to kick them out and replace them with multiples. That's a lot of work, and more than anybody with no power there will be willing to do, but it's the only chance of the kind of success that you seem to want. Otherwise, there are too many uninteresting and suspect characters roaming that forum to compensate for the very few good ones, and nobody is going to be pining to be a part of that. I'm not trying to be a downer, just talking reality of the beast. |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Harry better heed this warning not to piss off his userbase with that merge. Isnt it anywhere from a quarter of that forum dont like Torri at all. |
|
| Author: | Michael A [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Price wrote: I think KJ went down the toilet on December 27th, 2008. price, I like your signature. |
|
| Author: | Mau [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
El Murato wrote: Harry better heed this warning not to piss off his userbase with that merge. Isnt it anywhere from a quarter of that forum dont like Torri at all. Does any one actually like him? |
|
| Author: | Michael A [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Me! Me! oh oh, pick me! |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Mr. Aniston wrote: El Murato wrote: Harry better heed this warning not to piss off his userbase with that merge. Isnt it anywhere from a quarter of that forum dont like Torri at all. Does any one actually like him? I think he sometimes gets a bad rap because he acts before he thinks a lot. He's not a retard like box is, but he certainly does seem to consort with that ilk more than he should. I wasn't here for his administration, so I can only speculate what went wrong, but why would filmgasm dislike him? |
|
| Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Mav, I don't appreciate personal unprovoked attacks like this one in your post above. |
|
| Author: | snack [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Maverik, has your dog died yet? |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
lil snack wrote: Maverik, has your dog died yet? Are you a nigger? |
|
| Author: | snack [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
REPORTED. |
|
| Author: | Argos [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Maverikk tried to revive the animal with life-spending semen, but it ended in a mess. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Mav, I don't appreciate personal unprovoked attacks like this one in your post above. Glad to see you appreciated lil snack, though! |
|
| Author: | snack [ Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tonymontana |
Argos wrote: Maverikk tried to revive the animal with life-spending semen, but it ended in a mess. necrophilia, beastiality and incest, all at once. dino would be disturbed. |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|