World of KJ
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

Vanity Fair cover (Scarlett Johansson, Keira Knightly)
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16747
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Alex Y. [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Vanity Fair cover (Scarlett Johansson, Keira Knightly)

Scarlett has a nice butt, even though it's too white here. Rachel McAdams was also supposed participate but she backed out when she found out she had to be nude.

Image

Author:  bABA [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

awful picture

Author:  xiayun [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

Image

Author:  Libs [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:51 pm ]
Post subject: 

They actually both look kind of meh. Good going, Vanity Fair.

This is the photo shoot that caused Rachel McAdams to like fire her agent, right?

Author:  xiayun [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

Keira looked too skinny, and Scarlett looked too white. She is certainly hotter in Match Point.

Author:  El Maskado [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

They need to see the sunlight badly

Author:  zingy [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

xiayun wrote:
Keira looked too skinny, and Scarlett looked too white. She is certainly hotter in Match Point.


Agreed.

Author:  A. G. [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

The inclusion of that guy kind of creeps it up. I can understand Rachel McAdams not wanting to do it caused a last minute issue but that picture doesn't work, looks like something from Cinemax at 2am.

It's not a very good picture of those two anyway, they don't look much like themselves. I'm all for seeing their bodies and all but for the cover shot a little more style would have been nicer.

Author:  bABA [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sad Clown wrote:
They need to see the sunlight badly


no they dont. their skin will burn up. they look vampirish.

Author:  A. G. [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sad Clown wrote:
They need to see the sunlight badly

Agreed.

Author:  Anonymous [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'm pretty sure Scarlett is haunting my attic.

Still, that's a party I want to RSVP.

Is that Jeremy Piven chewing on Keira or is it fabulous stylist Jonathan Antin?

Author:  Kris K [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

Scarlett looks frumpy.

Looks like an ad for van helsing.

Author:  Kris K [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

This is just the best one they have ever done.....

Image

Author:  Anonymous [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

I like a round ass.

What?

:nonono:

Author:  Joker's Thug #3 [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Knightly throws up after every meal. Thats the secret to having a big head and skinny body.

Author:  Thegun [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

Its funny you say that, I really think that is Jeremy Piven too, Its a very weird picture.

Author:  Thegun [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:28 pm ]
Post subject: 

Scratch that, I didnt see the larger picture, its not Piven.

Author:  Anonymous [ Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

Though Keira has the better face, making love to Scarlett would be less like fucking a fourteen year old boy.

So the win goes to Scarlett.

Author:  Harry Warden [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:04 am ]
Post subject: 

Not a very good picture. Who knew Scarlett was fat? Knightley looks skinny yes, but we all knew she was beforehand so she comes off looking better. By wimping out, Rachel McAdams ruined what could have been a very good cover. She really must not have a good body to not agree to do this when the other two did.

Author:  Christian [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:06 am ]
Post subject: 

Isn't the guy designer Tom Ford?

Author:  Goldie [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:07 am ]
Post subject: 

Joe wrote:
Not a very good picture. Who knew Scarlett was fat? Knightley looks skinny yes, but we all knew she was beforehand so she comes off looking better. By wimping out, Rachel McAdams ruined what could have been a very good cover. She really must not have a good body to not agree to do this when the other two did.


In some movies, Rachel McAdams does look like she might have a little caboose > like Kelly Clarkson

but there is nothing wrong with that.

Author:  Goldie [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:09 am ]
Post subject: 

Even though I am not into vampire looking woman, it probably would be Scarlett by a HEAD.

Author:  Harry Warden [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:13 am ]
Post subject: 

Goldie wrote:
Joe wrote:
Not a very good picture. Who knew Scarlett was fat? Knightley looks skinny yes, but we all knew she was beforehand so she comes off looking better. By wimping out, Rachel McAdams ruined what could have been a very good cover. She really must not have a good body to not agree to do this when the other two did.


In some movies, Rachel McAdams does look like she might have a little caboose > like Kelly Clarkson

but there is nothing wrong with that.


But she doesn't have anything up top, if you know what I mean.

Author:  A. G. [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:13 am ]
Post subject: 

@Christian, yes it is.
@Goldie, a caboose because of bone structure and that kind of thing is great. If it's because of unhealthiness, not so much. I assume McAdamns is the former.
@Loyal, I don't have a basis for comparison on that myself.

Author:  Joker's Thug #3 [ Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:37 am ]
Post subject: 

Scarlett Johansson fat? Yeah I dont really think she's anything special, but she's not fat. I guess anyone can look fat next to Knightly though.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/