Crux wrote:
There are a ton of gray areas when discussing the tobacco vs. alcohol debate. Firstly when speaking of alcohol "users", 99% of people who drink aren't alcoholics and will probably never will suffer any long term negative effects. It will mostly be the 1% of "users" who abuse alcohol who end up suffering.
Obviously tobacco has a higher percentage of people more dependent/abusive of substance but your 1% is complete bullshit:
http://www.alcoholalcoholism.org/inform ... statistics17.6 million people currently diagnosed as alcoholics. That's 5.7% of just the ENTIRE country. If you just look at "users" (i.e. anyone above a casual drink, which I would define as someone who has at least 2 drinks per month), that percentage is likely much higher. Lower than the percentage tobacco has on its users but your 1% is bullshit.