Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:52 am



Reply to topic  [ 562 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
 2013-2014 NFL Discussion 
Author Message
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 21876
Location: Places
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
Chippy wrote:
Talent only takes you so far. You can get away with it in high school and most of college. But just talent won't get you shit in the NFL.


What are you arguing? That the aforementioned players didn't accomplish "shit in the NFL"?

Randy Moss's enormous advantage in talent overtakes Rice's statistical advantage given the context. They have very close numbers through 14 seasons despite extremely different circumstances.

Calvin Johnson is even more absurd.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:10 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
Are you not even looking at the stats? Your argument is dead. I won. You fucking lost because you're a fucking dumbass who thinks that TERRELL FUCKING OWENS is better than JERRY GOAT RICE.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:39 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
UGH.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Feb 05, 2014 1:45 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
Nobody on twitter has confirmed the exact details. I even read that CBS gets 14 Thursday games and 2 Saturday games.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:06 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
I'm assuming they're airing the 8 CBS/NFLNet games on both channels, but it won't be seperate announcing crews.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:11 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
I could've just read this: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200000 ... ll-in-2014

I'm not super excited about more Simms/Nantz. And I don't know how I feel about the return of Saturday games.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:14 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37887
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
Mike Lombardi was gonna hook the Browns up with a Johnny Football/Josh McDaniels combo and their owner was like lol go back to the BS Report dude

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:04 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
The Browns are idiots.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:07 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7172
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
I've been watching the combine this weekend. I'm kind of curious what the Packers will do in their position in the first round at 21. They have Datone Jones at DE coming back from injury and hopefully he shows why he was drafted first round last year. The Packers have several needs, including TE (Finley is a ?), LB (someone to complement Matthews), S (we just need a good one). I just don't think there is going to be a safety or LB at 21 that fits what the Packers need. There might be a quality TE at that spot, but it might be a reach taking them one in the first round. I have a feeling that the best player available (something the Packers like to draft in place of a need pick) is going to be a WR. There are some serious studs in this class! On the flip side, there are so many impressive receivers they could probably get quality in later rounds. James Jones may or may not be back, and a WR wouldn't be a bad pick.

We've got a few months, but if they take one of these big receivers, there could be no stopping the Packers offense (assuming Bulaga at OL comes back strong from injury and the OL is improved.)


Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:56 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7172
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
I've been watching the combine this weekend. I'm kind of curious what the Packers will do in their position in the first round at 21. They have Datone Jones at DE coming back from injury and hopefully he shows why he was drafted first round last year. The Packers have several needs, including TE (Finley is a ?), LB (someone to complement Matthews), S (we just need a good one). I just don't think there is going to be a safety or LB at 21 that fits what the Packers need. There might be a quality TE at that spot, but it might be a reach taking them one in the first round. I have a feeling that the best player available (something the Packers like to draft in place of a need pick) is going to be a WR. There are some serious studs in this class! On the flip side, there are so many impressive receivers they could probably get quality in later rounds. James Jones may or may not be back, and a WR wouldn't be a bad pick.

We've got a few months, but if they take one of these big receivers, there could be no stopping the Packers offense (assuming Bulaga at OL comes back strong from injury and the OL is improved.)


Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:56 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
Clowney ran a 4.47.

Because lol

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:45 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 2013-2014 NFL Discussion
Clowney probably will be #1. The question is will the Texans take him or get some more picks for it. He really doesn't fit their scheme, so who knows.


Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:29 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 562 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.